Clinical & Experimental Metastasis

, Volume 25, Issue 3, pp 265–272 | Cite as

Alterations in Cx43 and OB-cadherin affect breast cancer cell metastatic potential

Research Paper


Emerging evidence suggests that gap junctional intercellular communication (GJIC) and expression of connexins (Cx) contribute to the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells. To more directly address this, an aggressive bone metastasis breast cancer cell line, MDA-MET (MET), was stably transfected with human Cx43 cDNA (MET/Cx43+). Focusing on clone 28 of MET/Cx43+, we demonstrated that GJIC, Cx43 protein and Cx43 mRNA were significantly increased in MET/Cx43+ cells relative to MET, the plasmid control for the Cx43 transfectants (MET/HY) and a metastatic breast cancer cell that is less metastatic to bone than MET, MDA-MB-231. Cx26 mRNA was also increased in MET/Cx43+ clone 28 cells while mRNA for Cx32, Cx37, Cx40 and Cx45 were not detected in any of the breast cancer cell lines examined. MET/Cx43+ clone 28 invasiveness was decreased by 33% relative to MET/HY, while their ability to migrate was unchanged. The ability of MET/Cx43+ clone 28 cells to adhere to hFOB and HUV-EC-C cells was decreased approximately 30% and 70%, respectively, relative to MET and MET/HY. E-cadherin and N-cadherin proteins were not detected in MET, MDA-MB-231, MET/Cx43+ clone 28 and MET/HY cells. However, OB-cadherin protein levels were decreased approximately 43% in MET/Cx43+ clone 28 relative to MET/HY cells. These findings suggest that GJIC and Cx43 expression contribute to breast cancer cell adhesion and migration, possibly through a mechanism involving OB-cadherin, and these changes in turn regulate the metastatic potential of breast cancer cells, especially to bone.


Connexin Bone Cancer MDA-MB-231 Osteoblasts Adhesion 



We thank Dr. Deborah S Grove for Real time RT-PCR technical support. This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute grant R01-CA 90991.


  1. 1.
    Pozzi A, Risek B, Kiang DT et al (1995) Analysis of multiple gap junction gene products in the rodent and human mammary gland. Exp Cell Res 220(1):212–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Loewenstein WR, Kanno Y (1966) Intercellular communication and the control of tissue growth: lack of communication between cancer cells. Nature 209(29):1248–1249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Saunders MM, Seraj MJ, Li Z et al (2001) Breast cancer metastatic potential correlates with a breakdown in homospecific and heterospecific gap junctional intercellular communication. Cancer Research 61(5):1765–1767PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kapoor P, Saunders MM, Li Z et al (2004) Breast cancer metastatic potential: correlation with increased heterotypic gap junctional intercellular communication between breast cancer cells and osteoblastic cells. Int J Cancer 111(5):693–697PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ito A, Katoh F, Kataoka TR et al (2000) A role for heterologous gap junctions between melanoma and endothelial cells in metastasis. J Clin Invest 105(9):1189–1197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pollmann MA, Shao Q, Laird DW et al (2005) Connexin 43 mediated gap junctional communication enhances breast tumor cell diapedesis in culture. Breast Cancer Res 7(4):R522–R534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bendre MS, Gaddy-Kurten D, Mon-Foote T et al (2002) Expression of interleukin 8 and not parathyroid hormone-related protein by human breast cancer cells correlates with bone metastasis in vivo. Cancer Res 62(19):5571–5579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harris SA, Enger RJ, Riggs BL et al (1995) Development and characterization of a conditionally immortalized human fetal osteoblastic cell line. J Bone Miner Res 10(2):178–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li Z, Zhou Z, Saunders MM et al (2006) Modulation of connexin43 alters expression of osteoblastic differentiation markers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290(4):C1248–C1255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    De Bruyn PP (1981) Structural substrates of bone marrow function. Semin Hematol 18(3):179–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chole RA, Tinling SP (1994) Bone lining cells of the mammalian cochlea. Hear Res 75(1–2):233–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schweitzer KM, Vicart P, Delouis C et al (1997) Characterization of a newly established human bone marrow endothelial cell line: distinct adhesive properties for hematopoietic progenitors compared with human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Lab Invest 76(1):25–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hillyer P, Mordelet E, Flynn G et al (2003) Chemokines, chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules on different human endothelia: discriminating the tissue-specific functions that affect leucocyte migration. Clin Exp Immunol 134(3):431–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trosko J, Ruch R (1998) Cell–cell communication in carcinogenesis. Front Biosci 3:d208–d236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perl AK, Wilgenbus P, Dahl U et al (1998) A causal role for E-cadherin in the transition from adenoma to carcinoma. Nature 392(6672):190–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moll R, Mitze M, Frixen UH et al (1993) Differential loss of E-cadherin expression in infiltrating ductal and lobular breast carcinomas. Am J Pathol 143(6):1731–1742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nieman MT, Prudoff RS, Johnson KR et al (1999) N-cadherin promotes motility in human breast cancer cells regardless of their E-cadherin expression. J Cell Biol 147(3):631–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hazan RB, Phillips GR, Qiao RF et al (2000) Exogenous expression of N-cadherin in breast cancer cells induces cell migration, invasion, and metastasis. J Cell Biol 148(4):779–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kawaguchi J, Kii I, Sugiyama Y et al (2001) The transition of cadherin expression in osteoblast differentiation from mesenchymal cells: consistent expression of cadherin-11 in osteoblast lineage. J Bone Miner Res 16(2):260–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    van Nimwegen MJ, van de Water B (2007) Focal adhesion kinase: a potential target in cancer therapy. Biochem Pharmacol 73(5):597–609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lark AL, Livasy CA, Dressler L et al (2005) High focal adhesion kinase expression in invasive breast carcinomas is associated with an aggressive phenotype. Mod Pathol 18(10):1289–1294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Musculoskeletal Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics and RehabilitationThe Pennsylvania State University College of MedicineHersheyUSA

Personalised recommendations