Advertisement

Whose everyday climate cultures? Environmental subjectivities and invisibility in climate change discourse

  • Allison FordEmail author
  • Kari Marie Norgaard
Article

Abstract

Public climate conversations are inattentive to how differences in social location and culture shape people’s knowledge of and responses to climate change. Instead, emphases on climate apathy and climate skepticism overrepresent privileged sensibilities, marginalizing those who fall outside of what Black feminist theorist Audre Lorde calls “the mythical norm” (1987). In so doing, predominant approaches obscure forms of climate engagement that do not resemble researcher identified pro-environmental behaviors. In order to illustrate relationships between social location, culture, and response to climate change, we apply the notion of environmental subjectivities in a secondary analysis of climate engagement in two communities, one of which resembles and one of which lies outside the “mythical” norm. Both members of the Karuk Tribe and urban homesteaders frame climate change as symptoms of unsustainable political-economic structures. Yet differences in the structural location of each community result in divergent understandings of and practices in relation to the changing climate. These divergent community understandings and practices cannot be explained by individual preferences or cultural differences alone. Instead, the concept of environmental subjectivities (1) calls attention to the situated knowledges of climate change that emerge in relation to differences of indigeneity, race, and class, (2) relates community environmental practices to interlocking power structures, and (3) illustrates how elite narratives obscure the role of the colonial, settler, capitalist state in the generation of climate emissions.

Keywords

Indigenous peoples Culture Intersectionality Subjectivity Cultural framing 

Notes

References

  1. Acker J (1990) Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: a theory of gendered organizations. Gend Soc 4(2):139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A (2005) Environmentality Community, Intimate Government, and the Making of Environmental Subjects in Kumaon, India. Current Anthropology. 46(2):161–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arvin M, Tuck E, Morrill A (2013) Decolonizing Feminism: Challenging Connections between Settler Colonialism and Heteropatriarchy. Feminist Formations 25(1):8–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacon JM (2019) Settler colonialism as eco-social structure and the production of colonial ecological violence. Environmental Sociology 5(1):59–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bamberg S, Möser G (2007) Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: a new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 27(1):14–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck U (1992) In: Ritter M (ed) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Vol. 2. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellah RN, Swidler A, Madsen R, Tipton SM, Sullivan WM (1996) Habits of the heart : individualism and commitment in American life, 2nd edn. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett T Bull M, Maynard NG, Cochran P, Gough R, Lynn K, Maldonado J, Voggesser G, Wotkyns S, Cozzetto K (2014) Ch. 12: Indigenous peoples, lands, and resources. In: Melillo JM, Richmond T, Yohe GW (eds) Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, US Global Change Research Program, Pp 297–317Google Scholar
  9. Blake J (1999) Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between National Policy and local experience. Local Environ 4(3):257–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bolsen T, Druckman JN, Cook FL (2015) Citizens’, scientists’, and policy advisors’ beliefs about global warming. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 658(1):271–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bolsen T, Kingsland J, Palm R (2018) The impact of frames highlighting coastal flooding in the USA on climate change beliefs. Climatic Change 147:359–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonilla-Silva E (2014) Racism without a racists: color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States, 4th edn. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., LanhamGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdieu P (1987) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Translated. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Bureau, United States Census (2018) “Oregon.” Quick Facts. Retrieved (https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/OR). Accessed 26 June 2019
  15. Capstick S, Whitmarsh L, Poortinga W, Pidgeon N, Upham P (2015) International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. WIREs Clim Chang 6:35–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapin M (2004) A challenge to conservationists. World Watch:17–31Google Scholar
  17. Clements JM, McCright AM, Dietz T, Marquart-Pyatt ST (2015) A behavioural measure of environmental decision-making for social surveys. Environ Sociol 1(1):27–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins PH (1989) The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs J Women Cult Soc 14(4):745–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Collins PH (2009) Black feminist thought. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Crenshaw K (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanf Law Rev 43(6):1241–1299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Di Chiro G (1996) Nature as community: the convergence of environmental and social justice. In Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature, Pp 298–320Google Scholar
  22. Dietz T (2013) Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(Supplement_3):14081–14087CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Druckman JN (2015) Communicating policy-relevant science. PS: Political Science & Politics 48(S1):58–69Google Scholar
  24. Dunbar-Ortiz R (2018) Loaded: a disarming history of the second amendment. City Lights Publisher, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  25. Eliasoph N (1997) ‘Close to home’: the work of avoiding politics. Theory Soc 26(5):605–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher DR, Leifeld P, Iwaki Y (2013) Mapping the ideological networks of American climate politics. Clim Chang 116(3–4):523–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ford A (2019) The Self-sufficient Citizen: Ecological Habitus and Changing Environmental Practices. Sociological Perspectives 62(5):627–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ford A, Norgaard KM (2019) From denial to resistance: how emotions and culture shape our responses to climate change. In: Feola G, Geoghegan H, Arnall A (eds) Climate and culture: multidisciplinary perspectives on a warming world. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Godfrey PC (2012) Introduction: race , gender & class and climate change. Race, Gender & Class 19(1/2):3–11Google Scholar
  30. Harding S (2004) The feminist standpoint theory reader intellectual and political controversies. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Hargreaves T (2011) Practicing behaviour change: applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. J Consum Cult 11(1, SI):79–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hart PS, Nisbet EC (2012) Boomerang effects in science communication: how motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun Res 39(6):701–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hartter J, Hamilton LC, Boag AE, Stevens FR, Ducey MJ, Christoffersen ND, Oester PT, Palace MW (2018) Does it matter if people think climate change is human caused? Climate Services 10:53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hobsbawm E, Ranger T (1983) The invention of tradition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Hochschild AR (2016) Strangers in their own land: anger and mourning on the American right. The New Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  36. Jordan J (2005) Poem about my rights. In: Levi JH, Miles S (eds) Directed by Desire: The Collected Poems of June Jordan. Copper Canyon Press, Port Townsend, pp 309–312Google Scholar
  37. Kasper DVS (2009) Ecological habitus: toward a better understanding of socioecological relations. Organ Environ 22(3):311–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kennedy EH, Beckley TM, McFarlane BL, Nadeau S (2009) Why we don’t ‘walk the talk’: understanding the environmental values/behaviour gap in Canada. Hum Ecol Rev 16(2):151–160Google Scholar
  39. King CR (2004) This is not an Indian: situating claims about Indianness in sporting worlds. J Sport Soc Issues 28(1):3–10Google Scholar
  40. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people behave environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour. Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lareau A (2002) Invisible inequality: social class and childrearing in black families and white families. Am Sociol Rev 67(5):747–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee TM, Markowitz EM, Howe PD, Ko C-Y, Leiserowitz AA (2015) Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat Clim Chang 5(11):1014–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Feinberg G, Rosenthal S (2016) Climate change in the American mind. Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  44. Lertzman RA (2013) The myth of apathy: psychoanalytic explorations of environmental subjectivity. In: Weintrobe S (ed) Engaging with climate change: psychoanalytic and interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Lopez HI (2006) White by law: the legal construction of race. Revised an. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Lorde A (1987) Age, race, class and sex: women redefining difference. In: Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Crossing Press, Berkeley, pp 114–123Google Scholar
  47. Luís S, Vauclair C-M, Lima ML (2018) Raising awareness of climate change causes? Cross-National Evidence for the normalization of societal risk perception of climate change. Environ Sci Pol 80:74–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mann ME, Gleick PH, Touma D (2015) Climate change and California drought in the 21st century. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112(13):3858–3859CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Martin KA (1998) Becoming a gendered body: practices of preschools. Am Sociol Rev 63(4):494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Metag J, Füchslin T, Schäfer MS (2017) Global Warming’s five Germanys: a typology of Germans’ views on climate change and patterns of media use and information. Public Underst Sci 26(4):434–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moon W, Florkowski WJ, Brückner B, Schonhoff I (2002) Willingness to pay for environmental practices: implications for eco-labeling. Land Econ 78(1):88–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moser SC (2007) In the long shadows of inaction: the quiet building of a climate protection movement in the United States. Glob Environ Polit 7(2):124–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moser SC (2016) Reflections on climate change communication research and practice in the second decade of the 21st century: what more is there to say? Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 7(3):345–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nagel J (2012) Intersecting identities and global climate change. Identities 19(4):467–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Norgaard KM (2011) Living in denial: climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Norgaard KM (2012) Climate denial and the construction of innocence: reproducing transnational environmental privilege in the face of climate change. Race, Gender & Class 19:80–103Google Scholar
  57. O’Brien K (2012) Global environmental change III: closing the gap between knowledge and action. Prog Hum Geogr 37(4):587–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Omi M, Winant H (2015) Racial formation in the United States, 3rd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  59. Palm R, Lewis GB, Feng B (2017) What causes people to change their opinion about climate change? Ann Am Assoc Geogr 107(4):883–896Google Scholar
  60. Saphores J-DM, Ogunseitan OA, Shapiro AA (2012) Willingness to engage in a pro-environmental behavior: an analysis of e-waste recycling based on a National Survey of U.S. households. Resour Conserv Recycl 60:49–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scott JW (1986) Gender: a useful category of historical analysis. Am Hist Rev 91(5):1053–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sewell WH Jr (1992) A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. Am J Sociol 98(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shove E (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ Plan A 42(6):1273–1285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shove E, Walker G (2014) What is energy for? Social practice and energy demand. Theory Cult Soc 31(5):41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wetherell M (2008) Subjectivity or Psychodiscursive Practices? Investigating Complex Intersectional Identities. Subjectivity. 22:73–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Whyte KP (2017) Our ancestors’ dystopia now: indigenous conservation and the Anthropocene. In: Heise U, Christensen J, Niemann M (eds) Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  67. Wolfe P (1999) Settler colonialism and the transformation of anthropology: the politics and poetics of an ethnographic event. Cassell, LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. Wood BD, Vedlitz A (2007) Issue definition, information processing, and the politics of global warming. Am J Polit Sci 51(3):552–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yin RK (1981) The case study crisis: some answers. Adm Sci Q 26(1):58–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yin RK (2018) Case study research and applications: design and methods, 6th edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  71. Zia A, Todd AM (2010) Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: how to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Underst Sci 19(6):743–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations