Thermodynamic Model of CO2 Deposition in Cold Climates

  • Sandra K. S. BoetcherEmail author
  • Matthew J. Traum
  • Ted von Hippel


A thermodynamic model, borrowing ideas from psychrometric principles, of a cryogenic direct-air CO2-capture system utilizing a precooler is used to estimate the optimal CO2 removal fraction to minimize energy input per tonne of CO2. Energy costs to operate the system scale almost linearly with the temperature drop between the ingested air and the cryogenic desublimation temperature of CO2, driving siting to the coldest accessible locations. System performance in three Arctic/Antarctic regions where the proposed system can potentially be located is analyzed. Colder ambient temperatures provide colder system input air temperature yielding lower CO2 removal energy requirements. A case is also presented using direct-sky radiative cooling to feed colder-than-ambient air into the system. Removing greater fractions of the ingested CO2 lowers the CO2 desublimation temperature, thereby demanding greater energy input for air cooling. It therefore is disadvantageous to remove all CO2 from the processed air, and the optimal mass fraction of CO2 desublimated under this scheme is found to be ~0.8-0.9. In addition, a variety of precooler effectiveness (ε ) values are evaluated. Increasing effectiveness reduces the required system power input. However, beyond ε = 0.7, at certain higher values of desublimated CO2 mass fraction, the CO2 begins to solidify inside the precooler before reaching the cryocooler. This phenomenon fouls the precooler, negating its effectiveness. Further system efficiencies can be realized via a precooler designed to capture solidified CO2 and eliminate fouling.


CO2 desublimation thermodynamics cryogenics Arctic/Antarctica 



  1. Agee E, Orton A, Rogers J (2013) CO2 snow deposition in Antarctica to curtail anthropenic global warming. J App Meteor & Climat 52:281–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agee E, Orton A (2016) An initial laboratory prototype experiment for sequestration of atmospheric CO2. J Appl Meteor & Climat 55:1763–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baxter L, Baxter A, Burt S (2009) Cryogenic CO2 capture as a cost-effective CO2 capture process. International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, Pittsburgh, PA. Available from: (Accessed 15/05/2017).
  4. Chen Z, Zhu L, Raman A, Fan S (2016) Radiative cooling to deep sub-freezing temperatures through a 24-h day-night cycle. Nat Commun 7:13729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehre D, Lavert E, Lahav M, Lubomirsky I (2010) Water freezes differently on positively and negatively charged surfaces of pyroelectric materials. Science 327:672–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, Beerling D, Berner R, Masson-Delmotte V, Pagani M, Raymo M, Royer DL, Zachos JC (2008) Target atmospheric CO2 : Where should humanity aim? Open Atmos Sci J 2:217–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IPCC (2018) Global warming of 1.5 °C, URL: last accessed 10/1/2019
  8. Keith D, Ha-Duong M, Stolaroff J (2006) Climate strategy with CO2 capture from the air. Climatic Change 74:17–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lackner KS, Brennan S, Matter JM, Park AHA, Wright A, van der Zwaan B (2012) The urgency of development of CO2 capture from ambient air. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:13156–13162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lemmon E, Jacobsen R, Penoncello S, Friend D (2000) Thermodynamic properties of air and mixtures of nitrogen, argon, oxygen from 60 to 2000 K at pressures to 2000 MPa. Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data 29Google Scholar
  11. Lemmon EW, Bell I, Huber ML, McLinden MO (2018) NIST Standard Reference Database 23: Reference Fluid, Thermodynamic, and Transport Properties-REFPROP, Version 10.0, National Institutes of Standards and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
  12. Marty C, Philipona R, Delamere J, Dutton EG, Michalsky J, Stamnes K, Storvold R, Stoffel T, Clough SA, Mlawer EJ (2003) Downward longwave irradiance uncertainty under arctic atmospheres: Measurements and modeling. J Geophys Res 108:4358–4370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moran MJ, Shapiro HN, Boettner DD, Bailey MB (2018) Fundamentals of engineering thermodynamics, ninth ed. Wiley, Hoboken NJ USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Parish TR, Bromwich DH (1987) The surface windfield over the Antarctic ice sheets. Nature 328:5154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Petty GW (2008) A first course in atmospheric radiation, second edn. Sundog Publishing, Madison WI USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Radenbaugh R (2004) Refrigeration for superconductors. Proceedings of the IEEE 1719-1734Google Scholar
  17. Realmonte G, Drouet L, Gambhir A, Glynn J, Hawkes A, Köberle AC, Tavoni M (2019) An inter-model assessment of the role of direct air capture in deep mitigation pathways. Nat Commun 10:3277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Span R, Wagner W (1996) A new equation of state for carbon dioxide covering the fluid region from the triple-point temperature to 1100 K at pressures up to 800 MPa. J Phys Chem Reference Data 25Google Scholar
  19. Stolaroff JK, Keith DW, Lowry GV (2008) Carbon dioxide capture from atmospheric air using sodium hydroxide spray. Environ Sci Technol 42:2728–2735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. von Hippel T (2018) Thermal removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere: Energy requirements and scaling issues. Climatic Change 148:491–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walden VP, Warren SG, Murcray FJ (1998) Measurements of the downward longwave radiation spectrum over the Antarctic plateau and comparison with a line-by-line radiative transfer model for clear skies. J Geophys Res 103:3825–3846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Yu Z, Miller F, Pfotenhauer J (2017) Numerical modeling and analytical modeling of cryogenic carbon capture in de-sublimating heat exchanger. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 278Google Scholar
  23. Zeman F (2007) Energy and Material Balance of CO2 capture from ambient air. Environ Sci Technol 41:7558–7563CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDaytona BeachUSA
  2. 2.Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  3. 3.Physical SciencesEmbry-Riddle Aeronautical UniversityDaytona BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations