Ensuring climate services serve society: examining tribes’ collaborations with climate scientists using a capability approach
- 377 Downloads
Interest in climate service efforts continues to grow. However, more critical analysis could enhance how well climate services align with the needs of society. Collaborations between Native American Tribes (Tribes) and Climate Science Organizations (CSOs) providing decision-support for climate change planning accentuate the potential for climate services to have social justice implications through either deepening or softening existing inequities. This paper compares 30 Tribe-affiliated and 36 CSO-affiliated individuals’ perceptions about potential harms and benefits associated with their collaborations with one another. The importance of the potential benefits of collaborations listed outweighed the potential harms listed for both groups, but while climate science organizations rated the potential benefits listed slightly higher than Tribes did, the potential harms listed were much more salient for Tribes. This finding highlights concerns that, without proper training and management, these collaborations may reinforce unequal relationships between settler and Indigenous populations. While CSOs appeared cognizant of their Tribe-affiliated colleagues’ concerns, transitioning from a focus on building trust to establishing and sustaining shared systems of responsibilities might help these collaborations meet the needs of both groups more effectively.
It would not have been possible without the insights generously provided by our interviewees and Caitlin Kirby’s, Citralina Haruo’s, Brandon Boyd’s, and Yun-Jia Lo’s contributions. We would also like to extend a special thanks to the project participants who in person or remotely attended a 2-day workshop at the College of Menominee Nation in which the results were discussed and actions were outlined for moving forward with improving collaboration in climate science. Finally, we would like to thank our anonymous reviewers for helping enhance this paper.
NSF Grant #1540314 supported this project.
- CTKW (Climate and Traditional Knowledges Workgroup) (2014) Guidelines for considering traditional knowledges in climate change initiativesGoogle Scholar
- De Winter JCF, Dodou D (2010) Five-point Likert items: t test versus Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon. Pract Assess Res Eval 15Google Scholar
- Gigler B-S (2005) Indigenous peoples, human development and the capability approach. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Capability Approach. UNESCO, Paris, p 2005Google Scholar
- Grijalva JM (2008) Closing the circle: environmental justice in Indian country. Carolina Academic Press, DurhamGoogle Scholar
- Houser S, Teller V, MacCracken M, Gough R, Spears P (2001) Potential consequences of climate variability and change for native peoples and homelands. In: Climate change impacts on the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change: foundation, pp 351–377Google Scholar
- Kalafatis SE, Neosh J, Whyte KP, Libarkin J, Caldwell C (Under Review) Experiential learning processes informing climate change decision supportGoogle Scholar
- Kirby C, Haruo C, Whyte KP, Libarkin JC, Caldwell C, Edler R (2019) Training is needed to collaborate ethically: partnerships between native American tribes and climate science organizations. Gateways: International Journal of Community Engagement (January 2019)Google Scholar
- LaDuke W (2016) Indigenous environmental perspectives: a North American primer. In: Lobo S, Talbot S, Morris TL (eds) Native American voices: a reader, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York, pp 370–380Google Scholar
- Maldonado JK, Lazrus H, Bennett S et al (2016) The story of rising voices: facilitating collaboration between indigenous and Western ways of knowing. In: Companion M, Chaiken MS (eds) Responses to disasters and climate change: understanding vulnerability and fostering resilience. CRC Press, New York, pp 15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maynard NG (ed) (1998) Native peoples-native homelands climate change workshop, final report, October 28–November 1, 1998. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Albuquerque, NMGoogle Scholar
- Norton-Smith K, Lynn K, Chief K et al (2016) Climate change and indigenous peoples: a synthesis of current impacts and experiences. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-944. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
- Sen A (1989) Development as capability expansion. J Dev Plan 19:41–58Google Scholar
- Simpson CF, Dilling L, Dow K, Lackstrom KJ, Lemos MC, Riley RE (2016) Assessing needs and decision contexts: RISA approaches to engagement research. In: Parris AS, Garfin GM, Dow K, Meyer R, Close SL (eds) Climate in context: science and society partnering for adaptation. Wiley, West Sussex, pp 3–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Smith LT (2013) Decolonizing methodologies: research and indigenous peoples, 2nd edn. Zed Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Tsosie R (2013) Climate change and indigenous peoples: comparative models of sovereignty. Tulane Environ Law J 26:239–257Google Scholar
- Watene KPM (2011) Strengthening the capability approach: the foundations of the capability approach, with insights from two challenges. Ph.D. Thesis. University of St. AndrewsGoogle Scholar
- Weaver J (1996) Defending mother earth: Native American perspectives on environmental justice. Orbis Books, MaryknollGoogle Scholar
- Whyte KP (2017) The Dakota access pipeline, environmental injustice and U.S. colonialism. Red Ink- An International Journal of Indigenous Literature, Arts and Humanities 19(1):154–169Google Scholar
- Whyte KP (2018) Critical investigations of resilience: a brief introduction to indigenous environmental studies & sciences. Daedalus 147(2)Google Scholar