Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 153, Issue 1–2, pp 41–58 | Cite as

Local practitioners’ use of vulnerability and resilience concepts in adaptation to flood hazards

  • Greg OulahenEmail author
  • Linda Mortsch
  • Erin O’Connell
  • Deborah Harford
  • Alexandra Rutledge
Article

Abstract

Vulnerability and resilience are important ideas that are conceptualized in many different ways by researchers studying disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. Four main conceptualizations of vulnerability in the literature include vulnerability as a threshold, as exposure to hazards, as a pre-existing condition, and as an outcome. Three main conceptualizations of resilience are resilience as resistance, as recovery, and as creative transformation. This study investigates how local practitioners in Metro Vancouver municipalities perceive and apply these concepts to reduce risk and adapt to flood hazards. Results from focus groups and surveys of practitioners find that the conceptualizations of vulnerability and resilience perceived as most valuable are often not applied in local risk reduction and adaptation efforts. Participants’ interpretations of how vulnerability and resilience concepts are applied to four main adaptation strategies—protect, accommodate, avoid, and retreat—reveal nuanced and complex challenges at the intersection of where theory meets practice. As currently operationalized, vulnerability and resilience appear unlikely to lead to anything more than incremental adaptation.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the participants of the focus group for contributing their time and expertise to the study. The editor and reviewers provided valuable comments that helped improve the manuscript.

Funding information

This study was conducted as part of the Coastal Cities at Risk project, funded by Canada’s International Research Initiative on Adaptation to Climate Change (IRIACC). Managed by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), IRIACC is the result of a unique funding collaboration between IDRC, the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC), the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR).

References

  1. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geogr 24(3):347–364.  https://doi.org/10.1191/030913200701540465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):268–281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldunce P, Beilin R, Howden M, Handmer J (2015) Resilience for disaster risk management in a changing climate: practitioners’ frames and practices. Glob Environ Chang 30:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aldunce P, Handmer J, Beilin R, Howden M (2016) Is climate change framed as ‘business as usual’ or as a challenging issue? The practitioners’ dilemma. Eviron Plann C Gov Policy 34(5):999–1019.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X15614734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arlington Group (2013) Sea level rise adaptation primer: a toolkit to build adaptive capacity on Canada’s south coasts. Prepared for British Columbia Ministry of Environment. http://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/climate-change/adaptation/resources/slr-primer.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2017
  6. Begum R, Sarkar M, Jaafar A, Pereira J (2014) Toward conceptual frameworks for linking disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 10:362–373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2014.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birkmann J (2006) Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: conceptual frameworks and definitions. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient society. United Nations. University Press, Tokyo, pp 9–54Google Scholar
  8. Blythe J, Silver J, Evans L, Armitage D, Bennett NJ, Moore M-L, Morrison TH, Brown K (2018) The dark side of transformation: latent risks in contemporary sustainability discourse. Antipode.  https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12405
  9. Brand FS, Jax K (2007) Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc 12(1):23 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art23/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burch S (2010) In pursuit of resilient, low carbon communities: an examination of barriers to action in three Canadian cities. Energy Policy 38:7575–7585.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.06.070 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christmann GB, Balgar K, Mahlkow N (2014) Local constructions of vulnerability and resilience in the context of climate change. A comparison of Lubeck and Rostock. Soc Sci 3(1):142–159.  https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci3010142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. City of North Vancouver (2013) Climate change adaptation plan. http://www.cnv.org/your-government/living-city/climate-action/climate-change-adaptation. Accessed 31 August 2017
  13. City of Surrey (2013) Climate adaptation Strategy http://www.surrey.ca/files/(13365)_Climate_Adaption_Strategy_-_FINAL_WEB.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2017
  14. City of Vancouver (2012) Climate change adaptation strategy. http://vancouver.ca/files/cov/Vancouver-Climate-Change-Adaptation-Strategy-2012-11-07.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2017
  15. Cloutier G, Joerin F, Dubois C, Labarthe M, Legay C, Viens D (2015) Planning adaptation based on local actors’ knowledge and participation: a climate governance experiment. Clim Pol 15(4):458–474.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2014.937388 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cote M, Nightingale AJ (2012) Resilience thinking meets social theory: situating social change in socio-ecological systems (SES) research. Prog Hum Geogr 36(4):475–489.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20(4):529–539.  https://doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000407 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. District of North Vancouver (2017) Climate change adaptation strategy. https://www.dnv.org/sites/default/files/edocs/climate-change-adaptation-strategy.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2017
  19. Eakin H, Luers A (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31(1):365–394.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144352 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eisenack K, Moser SC, Hoffman E, Klein RJT, Oberlack C, Pechan A, Rotter M, Termeer C (2014) Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nat Clim Chang 4(10):867–872.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Folke C (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analysis. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):253–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J (2010) Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecol Soc 15(4):20–28 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art20/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fraser Basin Council (2016) Lower mainland flood management strategy: phase 1 summary report. https://www.fraserbasin.bc.ca/_Library/Water_Flood_Strategy/FBC_LMFMS_Phase_1_Report_Web_May_2016.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2017
  24. Füssel H (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2(2):265–275.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-007-0032-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaillard JC, Mercer J (2013) From knowledge to action: bridging gaps in disaster risk reduction. Prog Hum Geogr 37(1):93–114.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132512446717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Handmer JW, Dovers SR (1996) A typology of resilience: rethinking institutions for sustainable development. Ind Environ Crisis Q 9(4):482–511.  https://doi.org/10.1177/108602669600900403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hegger D, Lamers M, Van Zeijl-Rozema A, Dieperink C (2012) Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action. Environ Sci Pol 18:52–65.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hewitt K (1983) Interpretations of calamity from the viewpoint of human ecology. Allen & Unwin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  29. Holling C (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.000245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. IPCC (2012) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB et al (eds) Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II Of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  31. IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB et al (eds) Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  32. Janssen M, Schoon ML, Ke W, Borner K (2006) Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):240–252.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Joakim E, Mortsch L, Oulahen G (2015) Using vulnerability and resilience concepts to advance climate change adaptation. Environ Hazards 14(2):137–155.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2014.1003777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Chang 47:325–352.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005627828199
  35. Kelman I, Gaillard JC, Lewis J, Mercer J (2016) Learning from the history of disaster vulnerability and resilience research and practice for climate change. Nat Hazards 82(1):129–143.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2294-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ, Thomalla F (2003) Resilience to natural hazards: how useful is this concept? Environ Hazards 5:35–45.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazards.2004.02.001
  37. Klein RJT, Midgley GF, Preston BL, Alam M, Berkhout FGH, Dow K, Shaw MR (2014) Adaptation opportunities, constraints, and limits. In: Field CB et al (eds) Climate change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 899–943Google Scholar
  38. Kulig J (2000) Community resilience: the potential for community health nursing theory development. Public Health Nurs 17(5):374–385.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1446.2000.00374.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kumpfer K (1999) Factors and processes contributing to resilience. In: Glantz M, Johnson J (eds) Resilience and development: positive life adaptations. Kluwer, New York, pp 179–224Google Scholar
  40. Magis K (2010) Community resilience: an indicator of social sustainability. Soc Nat Resour 23(5):401–416.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920903305674 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matyas D, Pelling M (2014) Positioning resilience for 2015: the role of resistance, incremental adjustment and transformation in disaster risk management policy. Disasters 39:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCormick S (2016) Assessing climate change vulnerability in urban America: stakeholder-driven approaches. Clim Chang 138(3–4):397–410.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1757-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meerow S, Stults M (2016) Comparing conceptualizations of urban climate resilience in theory and practice. Sustain 8(7):701.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meerow S, Newell J, Stults M (2016) Defining urban resilience: a review. Landsc Urban Plan 147:38–49.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mortsch L (2011) Multiple dimensions of vulnerability and its influence on adaptation planning and decision making. In: Linkov I, Bridges TS (eds) Climate: global change and local adaptation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 67–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Schjolden A, Nygaard L (2004) ‘What’s in a word? Conflicting interpretations of vulnerability in climate change research’, CICERO Working Paper 2004:04, Oslo, Norway. http://www.africa-adapt.net/media/resources/96/CICERO_vulnerability.pdf. Accessed 31 August 2017
  47. O’Brien K, Eriksen S, Nygaard L, Schjolden A (2007) Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Clim Pol 7(1):73–88.  https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0706 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Paton D (2006) Disaster resilience: building capacity to co-exist with natural hazards. In: Paton D, Johnston D (eds) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, pp 3–10Google Scholar
  49. Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Pelling M, O’Brien K, Matyas D (2015) Adaptation and transformation. Clim Chang 133:113–127.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1303-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ronan KR, Johnston DM (2005) Promoting community resilience in disasters: the role for schools, youth and families. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  52. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):282–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Villágran JC (2006) Vulnerability: a conceptual and methodological review. United Nations University: Institute for Environment and Human Security, Bonn. http://collections.unu.edu/eserv/unu:1871/pdf3904.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2017
  54. Vogel C, Moser SC, Kasperson RE, Dabelko GD (2007) Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Glob Environ Chang 17(3):349–364.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weichselgartner J, Kasperson R (2010) Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research. Glob Environ Chang 20(2):266–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greg Oulahen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Linda Mortsch
    • 2
  • Erin O’Connell
    • 2
  • Deborah Harford
    • 3
  • Alexandra Rutledge
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Geography and Environmental StudiesRyerson UniversityTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of EnvironmentUniversity of WaterlooWaterlooCanada
  3. 3.Adaptation to Climate Change Team (ACT)Simon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations