Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 151, Issue 3–4, pp 589–603 | Cite as

Developing a model of climate change behavior among adolescents

  • Kathryn T. Stevenson
  • M. Nils Peterson
  • Howard D. Bondell
Article

Abstract

Research on adolescent climate change perceptions has uncovered key insights about how knowledge, concern, and hope might relate to behavior and the potential for educational interventions to influence these factors. However, few of these studies have employed treatment/control designs that might address causality and none have addressed how these factors might interact to influence behavior. We developed a model of behavior change where a climate education treatment impacted knowledge, knowledge impacted hope and concern, and hope and concern together impacted behavior. We empirically tested the utility of this model and the causal relationships within it using a pre/post, treatment/control evaluation of climate education among adolescents in North Carolina, USA (n = 1041). We found support for a causal relationship between the treatment and gains in knowledge, but not between treatment and behavior. However, we did find support for a path model in which climate change knowledge positively relates to increased climate change concern and hope, and increases in concern and hope predict changes in pro-environmental behavior. Low SES was related to smaller gains in knowledge, concern, and behavior. Our results contribute to a theoretical understanding of climate change behaviors among adolescents and suggest that climate education aiming to change behavior should focus on building hope and concern.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Christine Li and Martha Monroe at University of Florida for their valuable insights and project, as well as research team members Renee Strnad and Sarah Carrier.

Funding information

This study received financial support from the NC Sea Grant (project ID no. 2014-R/16-ELWD-1).

Supplementary material

10584_2018_2313_MOESM1_ESM.docx (507 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 507 kb)

References

  1. 107th Congress (2002) No Child Left Behind (NCLB) ActGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexandar R, Poyyamoli G (2012) Activity-based water resources and climate change education among school students in Puducherry. In: Filho WL (ed) Climate change and the sustainable use of water resources. Springer, Berlin, pp 557–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Allison PD (1990) Change scores as dependent variables in regression analysis. Sociol Methodol 20:93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84:191–215.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
  5. Betz NE, Weber EU (2002) A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. J Behav Decis Mak 290:263–290Google Scholar
  6. Bollen KA, Tueller SJ, Oberski D (2013) Issues in the structural equation modeling of complex survey data. In: Proceedings of the 59th World Statistics Congress. Hong Kong: Unknown PublisherGoogle Scholar
  7. Christ SL, Lee DJ, Lam BL et al (2008) Assessment of the effect of visual impairment on mortality through multiple health pathways: structural equation modeling. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:3318–3323.  https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-1676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA et al (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8:1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corner A, Roberts O, Chiari S et al (2015) How do young people engage with climate change? The role of knowledge, values, message framing, and trusted communicators. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 6:523–534.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalecki M, Willits FK (1991) Examining change using regression analysis: three approaches compared. Sociol Spectr 11:127–145.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.1991.9981960 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desimone LM, Le Floch KC (2004) Are We Asking the Right Questions? Using Cognitive Interviews to Improve Surveys in Education Research. Educ Eval Policy Anal 26:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737026001001
  12. Dougiamas M, Taylor P. (2003) Moodle: using learning communities to create an open source course management system. . In: Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Computing Education (AACE), 171–178Google Scholar
  13. Duerden MD, Witt PA (2010) The impact of direct and indirect experiences on the development of environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior. J Environ Psychol 30:379–392.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.03.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fehr-Duda H, Fehr E (2016) Finding ways to adapt natural tendencies and nudge collective action is central to the game human nature. Nature 530:5–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flora JA, Saphir M, Lappé M et al (2014) Evaluation of a national high school entertainment education program: the Alliance for Climate Education. Clim Chang 127:419–434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1274-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Floyd MF, Taylor WC, Whitt-Glover M (2009) Measurement of park and recreation environments that support physical activity in low-income communities of color. Highlights of Challenges and Recommendations. Am J Prev Med 36:S156–S160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L et al (2009) What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. Am Educ Res J 38:915–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geiger N, Swim JK, Fraser J (2017) Creating a climate for change: interventions, efficacy and public discussion about climate change. J Environ Psychol 51:104–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gordon MS (2016) Community disadvantage and adolescent’s academic achievement: the mediating role of father influence. J Child Fam Stud 25:2068–2078Google Scholar
  20. Hair JH, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  21. Hamilton LC (2011) Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Clim Chang 104:231–242.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9957-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hancock GR, Mueller RO (2006) Structural equation modeling: a second course. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NCGoogle Scholar
  23. Hestness E, McDonald RC, Breslyn W et al (2014) Science teacher professional development in climate change education informed by the next generation science standards. J Geosci Educ 62:319–329.  https://doi.org/10.5408/13-049.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hollweg KS, Taylor J, Bybee RW et al (2011) Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. NAAEE, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Hornsey MJ, Fielding KS (2016) A cautionary note about messages of hope: focusing on progress in reducing carbon emissions weakens mitigation motivation. Glob Environ Chang 39:26–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hornsey MJ, Harris EA, Bain PG, Fielding KS (2016) Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nat Clim Chang:1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943
  27. Hungerford HR, Volk T (1990) Changing learner behavior through environmental education. J Environ Educ 21:8–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IPCC (2018). IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C: Summary for policy makers. Incheon, South Korea. Available at: http://www.ipcc.ch/report/sr15/. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
  29. Jones GM, Jones BD, Hargrove T (2003) The unintended consequences of high stakes testing. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
  30. Kahan DM, Jenkins-Smith H, Braman D (2011) Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 14:147–174.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karpudewan M, Roth W-M, Abdullah Bin MNS (2014) Enhancing primary school students’ knowledge about global warming and environmental attitude using climate change activities. Int J Sci Educ 37:31–54.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.958600 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8:37–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462022014540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leeming FC, Porter BE, Dwyer WO et al (1997) Effects of participation in class activities on children’s environmental attitudes and knowledge. J Environ Educ 28:33–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leiserowitz A (2004) The day after tomorrow: a study of climate change risk perception. Environment 46:22–39Google Scholar
  35. Leiserowitz A, Smith N, Marlon J (2011) American teens’ knowledge of climate change. Yale project on climate change communication, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  36. Li CJ, Monroe MC (2018) Development and validation of the climate change hope scale for high school students 50:454–479.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517708325
  37. McBeth B, Hungerford H, Marcinkowski T, et al (2011) National environmental literacy assessment, phase two: measuring the effectiveness of North American environmental education programs with respect to the parameters of environmental literacy. Final ReportGoogle Scholar
  38. McLeod LJ, Hine DW, Please PM, Driver AB (2015) Applying behavioral theories to invasive animal management: towards an integrated framework. J Environ Manag 161:63–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.06.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Myers TA, Nisbet MC, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz AA (2012) A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change. Clim Chang 113:1105–1112.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0513-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nerlich B, Koteyko N, Brown B (2010) Theory and language of climate change communication. WIRE Clim Chang 1:97–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Norgaard KM (2011) Living in denial: climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Öhman J, Öhman M (2013) Participatory approach in practice : an analysis of student discussions about climate change. Environ Educ Res 19:324–341.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.695012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ojala M (2015) Hope in the face of climate change: associations with environmental engagement and student perceptions of teachers’ emotion communication style and future orientation. J Environ Educ 46:133–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2015.1021662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ojala M (2016) Young people and global climate change: emotions, coping and engagement in everyday life. In: Ansell N, Kocker N, Skelton T (eds) Geographies of global issues: change and threat. Springer reference, Singapore, pp 329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Plutzer E, Mccaffrey M, Hannah AL et al (2016) Climate confusion among U.S. teachers. Science 351(80):664–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Project WILD (2014) Project WILD. http://www.projectwild.org/LearningFramework.htm. Accessed 2 Jun 2014
  47. Ranney MA, Clark D (2016) Climate change conceptual change: scientific infomration can transform attitudes. Top Cogn Sci 8:49–75.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rickinson M (2001) Learners and learning in environmental education: a critical review of the evidence. Environ Educ Res 7:207–320.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462012006523 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Román D, Busch KC (2015) Textbooks of doubt: using systemic functional analysis to explore the framing of climate change in middle-school science textbooks. Environ Educ Res 4622:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1091878 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Savelsbergh ER, Prins GT, Rietbergen C et al (2015) Effects of innovative science and mathematics teaching on student attitudes and achievement: a meta-analytic study. Educ Res Rev 19:158–174.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sellmann D, Bogner FX (2013) Climate change education: quantitively assessing the impact of a botanical garden as an informal learning environment. Environ Educ Res 19:415–429.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2012.700696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shea NA, Mouza C, Drewes A (2016) Climate change professional development: design, implementation, and initial outcomes on teacher learning, practice, and student beliefs. J Sci Teach Educ 27:1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9456-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shi J, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M (2015) Public perception of climate change: the importance of knowledge and cultural worldviews. Risk Anal 35:2183–2201.  https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sirin SR (2005) Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Rev Educ Res 75:417–453.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075003417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith N, Leiserowitz A (2014) The role of emotion in global warming policy support and opposition. Risk Anal 34:937–948.  https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.12140 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR et al (1991) The will and the ways: development and validation of an individual-differences measure of hope. J Pers Soc Psychol 60:570–585.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.570 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sterman JD (2011) Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Clim Chang 108:811–826.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0189-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stern PC (2012) Psychology: fear and hope in climate messages. Nat Clim Chang 2:572–573.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1610 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stern PC, Dietz T (1994) The value basis of environmental concern. J Soc Issues 50:65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stevenson KT, Peterson N (2015) Motivating action through fostering climate change hope and concern and avoiding despair among adolescents. Sustainability 8:6.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD et al (2013) Environmental, institutional, and demographic predictors of environmental literacy among middle school children. PLoS One.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059519
  62. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD et al (2014) Overcoming skepticism with education: interacting influences of worldview and climate change knowledge on perceived climate change risk among adolescents. Clim Chang 126:293–304.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1228-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stevenson KT, Lashley MA, Chitwood MC et al (2015) How emotion trumps logic in climate change risk perception: exploring the affective heuristic among wildlife science students. Hum Dimens Wildl 20:501–513.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2015.1077538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Stevenson KT, Peterson MN, Bondell HD (2016) The influence of personal beliefs, friends, and family in building climate change concern among adolescents. Environ Educ Res 4622:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1177712 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Streiner DL (2005) Finding our way: An introduction to path analysis. Can J Psychiatry 50:115–122Google Scholar
  66. Sundblad E-L, Biel A, Gärling T (2007) Cognitive and affective risk judgements related to climate change. J Environ Psychol 27:97–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.01.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Theobald R, Freeman S (2014) Is it the intervention or the students? Using linear regression to control for student characteristics in undergraduate STEM education research. CBE Life Sci Educ 13:41–48.  https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe-13-07-0136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. US Department of Education (2012) National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) Home Page, part of the U.S. Department of Education. http://nces.ed.gov/. Accessed 18 Mar 2013
  69. Valdez R, Peterson NM, Stevenson KT (2018) How communication with teachers, family, and friends contributes to predicting climate change behavior among adolescents. Environ Conserv 45:183–191.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000443
  70. Williams B, Brown T, Onsman A (2012) Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. Australas J Paramadicine 8:1–13Google Scholar
  71. Wise SB (2010) Climate change in the classroom: patterns, motivations, and barriers to instruction among Colorado science teachers. J Geosci Educ 58:296–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yang ZJ, Kahlor L (2012) What, me worry? The role of affect in information seeking and avoidance. Sci Commun 35:189–212.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547012441873 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.North Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations