Political orientation and climate concern shape visual attention to climate change
Despite the scientific consensus, there is widespread public controversy about climate change. Previous explanations focused on interpretations hampered by political bias or insufficient knowledge of climate facts. We propose that public views of climate change may also be related to an attentional bias at a more basic level of cognitive processing. We hypothesized that selective visual attention towards or away from climate-related information would be associated with climate concern. To test prioritization of climate-related stimuli under conditions of limited attention, we asked participants to identify climate-related and neutral words within a rapid stream of stimuli. Undergraduate students attended to climate-related words more readily than neutral words. This attentional prioritization correlated with self-rated climate concern. We then examined this relationship in a more diverse community sample. Principal component analysis of survey data in the community sample revealed a component indexing a relationship between climate concern and political orientation. That component was correlated with the degree of selective inattention to climate-related words. Our findings suggest that climate-related communications may be most effective if tailored in a manner accounting for how attentional priorities differ between audiences—particularly those with different political orientations.
We thank Cassandra Bethel, Sumeyye Cakal, Hoiki Cheung, Bevan Lugg, Yu Luo, Joey Manaligod, Paniz Pasha, Rochelle Picardo, Emilie Ptak, Hwa Baek Song, Emily Suddes, Nicole Tsang, Aline Vilks, May Wang, Ru Qi Yu, and Michelle Zhang for their assistance with data collection and data management.
R. M. T. conceived the study with J. Z. R. M. T., J. C. W., J. Z., and K. H. R. contributed to the study design and J. C. W. analyzed the data and wrote the paper with R. M. T and J. Z.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
There are no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical review was conducted by the University of British Columbia Behavioural Research Ethics Board.
All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.
- Giddens A (2009) The politics of climate change. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Lee D, Todd RM, Gardhouse K, Levine B, Anderson AK (2013) Enhanced attentional capture in survivors of a single traumatic event. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Lieserowitz A (2007) Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities. In: Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. pp 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511535871.005
- Rainie L, Funk C, Kennedy B, et al (2015) Americans, politics, and science issues. Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/07/01/americans-politics-and-science-issues/ Google Scholar
- Sheppard SRJ (2012) Visualizing climate change: a guide to visual communication of climate change and developing local solutions. Routledge, OxonGoogle Scholar
- UBC (2017) Annual sustainability report 2016–2017. University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar