Climatic Change

, Volume 150, Issue 1–2, pp 89–101 | Cite as

Toward a global coal mining moratorium? A comparative analysis of coal mining policies in the USA, China, India and Australia

  • Mathieu BlondeelEmail author
  • Thijs Van de Graaf


To stop global warming at well below 2° C, the bulk of the world’s fossil fuel reserves will have to be left in the ground. Coal is the fossil fuel with the greatest proportion that cannot be used, and various advocacy groups are campaigning for a ban on the opening of new coal mines. Recently, both China and the USA implemented temporary moratoria on the approval of new coal mining leases. This article examines whether these coal mining bans reflect the emergence of a global norm to keep coal under the ground. To that end, we review recent coal mining policies in the four largest coal producers and explain them comparatively with a framework based on interests, ideas and institutions. We find that the norm of keeping coal in the ground remains essentially contested. Even in those countries that have introduced some form of a coal mining moratorium, the ban can easily be, or has already been, reversed. To the extent that the norm of keeping coal in the ground has momentum, it is primarily due to non-climate reasons: the Chinese moratorium was mostly an instance of industrial policy (aiming to protect Chinese coal companies and their workers from the overcapacity and low prices that are hitting the industry), while the USA’s lease restrictions were mainly motivated by concerns over fiscal justice. We do not find evidence of norm internalisation, which means that the emerging norm fails to gain much traction amid relevant national actors and other (large) coal producing states. If proponents of a moratorium succeed in framing the issue in non-climate terms, they should have a greater chance of building domestic political coalitions in favour of the norm.


  1. Baer HA (2016) The nexus of the coal industry and the state in Australia: historical dimensions and contemporary challenges. Energy Policy 99:194–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker P (2017) Does Donald Trump Still Think Climate Change is a Hoax? No one Can say. Accessed 28 August 2017
  3. Baldwin R, Cave M and Lodge M (2012) Understanding regulation: theory, strategy and practice. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. BP (2016) Statistical review of world energy 2017. BP, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Clapp J, Swanston L (2009) Doing away with plastic shopping bags: international patterns of norm emergence and policy implementation. Environ 18(3):315–332Google Scholar
  6. Connor LH (2016) Energy futures, state planning policies and coal mine contests in rural New South Wales. Energy Policy 99:233–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornot-Gandolpe S (2017) Indonesia’s electricity demand and the coal sector: export or meet domestic demand? OIES Paper CL 5, March 2017. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Denniss R (2015) Launch of No New Coal Mines. The Australia Institute. Accessed 11 September 2017
  9. Denniss R, Adams P, Campbell R, Grudnoff M (2016) Never gonna dig you up! Modelling the economic impacts of a moratorium on new coal mines. The Australia Institute, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  10. Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (2017) Australia’s trade in goods and services 2016. Accessed 21 August 2017
  11. DOI (2017) Federal Coal Program. Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement – Scoping Report. Department of the Interior, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Duan H (2016) Windows of Opportunity: Coal Phase-Out in China. Paper presented at the International Conference on Fossil Fuel Supply and Climate Policy, Oxford University, 26–27 September 2016Google Scholar
  13. Falkner R (2016) The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. Int Aff 92(5):1107–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Finnemore M, Sikkink K (1998) International norm dynamics and political change. Int Organ 52(4):887–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Florini A (1996) The evolution of international norms. Int Stud Q 40(3):363–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grantham Institute (2015) Nicholas Stern welcomes initiative on coal mines by Anote Tong, President of the Republic of Kiribati. Accessed 25 August 2017
  17. Green F Anti-fossil fuel norms. Clim Chang (this issue)Google Scholar
  18. Guangyao Z (2016). Ecological Civilization. Accessed 7 July 2017
  19. Hall PA (1997) The role of interests, institutions, and ideas in the comparative political economy of the industrialized nations. In: Lichbach MI, Zuckerman AS (eds) Comparative politics: rationality, culture, and structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 174–207Google Scholar
  20. Hornby L (2016) China coal protests highlight overcapacity tensions. Financial Times. Accessed 1 March 2017
  21. Houle D, Lachapelle E, Purdon M (2015) Comparative politics of sub-Federal cap-and-Trade: implementing the western climate initiative. Global Environ Politics 15(3):49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hurst D (2015) Malcolm Turnbull: coal export ban ‘would make no difference to emissions’. Accessed 20 August 2016
  23. IEA (2015) World energy outlook 2015. IEA, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. ITC (2017) List of importers for the selected product: Coal, briquettes, ovoids and similar solid fuels manufactured from coal. ITC Trademap.|||||2701|||4|1|1|1|2|1|2|2|1. Accessed 2 March 2017
  25. Lahiri-Dutt K (2016) The diverse worlds of coal in India: energising the nation, energising livelihoods. Energy Policy 99:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lazarus M, Erickson P, Tempest K (2015) Supply-side climate policy: the road less taken. Stockholm Environment Institute, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucarelli B (2015) Australia’s black coal industry. Past achievements and future challenges. In: Thurber M C and Morse R K (eds) The global coal market: supplying the major fuel for emerging economies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 204–293Google Scholar
  28. Lucas A (2016) Stranded assets, externalities and carbon risk in the Australian coal industry: the case for contraction in a carbon-constrained world. Energy Res Soc Sci 11(1):53–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marino J (2016) Wall Street checks out of coal mines. CNBC. Accessed 2 March 2017
  30. Mathews J, Tan H (2017) China’s new silk road: will it contribute to the export of the black fossil-fuelled economy? The Asia-Pacific J 15(8):1–14Google Scholar
  31. McGlade C, Ekins P (2015) The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature 517:187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McNally CA (2012) Sino-capitalism: China’s reemergence and the international political economy. World Politics 64(4):741–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milman O (2015) Josh Frydenberg puts ‘strong moral case’ for coal exports to prevent deaths. Accessed 7 July 2017
  34. Ministry of Coal (2016) All India Coal Production target for 2016–17 fixed at 724.71 MT. Delhi, Government of IndiaGoogle Scholar
  35. NDRC (2015) Circular on Issues Concerning Strict Control of New Coal Mining Projects. Accessed 16 February 2017
  36. Obama B (2017) The irreversible momentum of clean energy. Science.
  37. Pacific Island Development Forum (2015) Suva Declaration on Climate Change. Accessed 16 February 2017
  38. Peng W (2015) The evolution of China’s coal institutions. In: Thurber C, Morse RK (eds) The global coal market: supplying the major fuel for emerging economies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 37–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Piggot G (2017) The influence of social movements on policies that constrain fossil fuel supply. Clim Pol.
  40. Platts (2017) China’s 13th Five-Year Plan for coal industry aims for more industry consolidation. Accessed 9 January 2017
  41. Purdon M (2015) Advancing comparative climate change politics: theory and method. Global Environ Politics 15(3):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qi Y, Stern N, Wu T, Green F (2016) China’s post-coal growth. Nat Geosci 9(8):564–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Robertson J (2017) Big four banks distance themselves from Adani coalmine as Westpac rules out loan. Accessed 12 September 2017
  44. Rosewarne S (2016) The transnationalisation of the Indian coal economy and the Australian political economy: the fusion of regimes of accumulation? Energy Policy 99:214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Secretary of the Interior (2016) Discretionary programmatic environmental impact statement to modernize the federal coal program. DOI, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  46. Shen L, Andrews-Speed P (2001) Economic analysis of reform policies for small coal mines in China. Resources Policy 27(4):247–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. State Council (2016) Coal capacity guideline issued. Accessed 16 February 2017
  48. Stigler GJ (1971) The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Manag Sci 2(1):3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Taylor L (2015) Prominent Australians ask world leaders to consider ban on new coal mines. Accessed 28 August 2017
  50. UNEP (2017) Partnership for Clean Fuels and Vehicles. Accessed 12 September 2017
  51. Urpelainen J, Van de Graaf T (2017) United States non-cooperation and the Paris agreement. Clim Pol.
  52. Van de Graaf T, Blondeel M (2018) Fossil fuel subsidy reform: an international norm perspective. In: Skovgaard J, van Asselt H (eds) The politics of fossil fuel subsidies and their reform. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. Ziman Y (2015) No new coal mines to be approved for three years to cut stockpiles. China Daily. Accessed 12 September 2017

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ghent UniversityGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations