Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 145, Issue 1–2, pp 117–130 | Cite as

Projected reductions in climatic suitability for vulnerable British birds

  • Dario Massimino
  • Alison Johnston
  • Simon Gillings
  • Frédéric Jiguet
  • James W. Pearce-Higgins
Article

Abstract

Projections of species’ distributions in future climates can aid adaptive conservation strategies. Although presence-absence or presence-only data have been extensively used for this purpose, modelling changes in spatial patterns of abundance provides a more sensitive tool for estimating species’ vulnerabilities to climate impacts. We used abundance data from citizen science bird surveys in the UK and France to predict spatial patterns of future climatic suitability throughout Great Britain for 124 breeding bird species. We project that climatic suitability of Great Britain will increase for 44% of species and decline for 9% of species by 2080. Of the latter group, most are already red-listed for their severe long-term population declines. If our suitability projections translate into population changes, by 2080, conservation listing status will worsen for 10 species and improve for 28 species. Projected changes in climatic suitability translate into net gains of species abundance in northern and western areas and high turnover in community composition throughout Britain, particularly under medium- and high-emission scenarios. In conclusion, community-wide projections of changes in climatic suitability based on abundance indicate that bird assemblages throughout Great Britain will be impacted by climate change and that species already of concern are likely to be impacted hardest. Of the species projected to benefit, the ability of currently red-listed species to respond positively to climate without other interventions is unclear.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We warmly thank the members and volunteers of the British Trust for Ornithology and the Centre de Recherches sur la Biologie des Populations d’Oiseaux who have contributed to the Breeding Bird Survey and the Suivi Temporel des Oiseaux Communs of French birds. The Breeding Bird Survey and this research are funded jointly by the British Trust for Ornithology, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (on behalf of the Council for Nature Conservation and Countryside, Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and Scottish Natural Heritage) and the Royal Society for Protection of Birds. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for insightful and constructive comments on the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded jointly by the British Trust for Ornithology, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee (on behalf of the Council for Nature Conservation and Countryside, Natural England, Natural Resources Wales and Scottish Natural Heritage) and the Royal Society for Protection of Birds.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10584_2017_2081_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (208 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 208 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM2_ESM.docx (219 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 219 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (78 kb)
ESM 3 (PDF 78 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (69 kb)
ESM 4 (PDF 69 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM5_ESM.docx (6.4 mb)
ESM 5 (DOCX 6509 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (75 kb)
ESM 6 (PDF 74 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM7_ESM.docx (19 kb)
ESM 7 (DOCX 18 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (29 kb)
ESM 8 (PDF 28 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM9_ESM.docx (201 kb)
ESM 9 (DOCX 200 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM10_ESM.docx (61 kb)
ESM 10 (DOCX 60 kb)
10584_2017_2081_MOESM11_ESM.docx (104 kb)
ESM 11 (DOCX 103 kb)

References

  1. Aebischer NJ, Ewald JA (2004) Managing the UK Grey Partridge Perdix perdix recovery: population change, reproduction, habitat and shooting. Ibis 146(S2):181–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong JS (2001) Combining forecasts. In: Armstrong JS (ed) Principle of Forecasting. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, pp 417–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baddeley A, Turner R (2005) spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12:1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balmer DE, Gillings S, Caffrey BJ, Swann RL, Downie IS, Fuller RJ (2013) Bird atlas 2007–11: the breeding and wintering birds of Britain and Ireland. BTO, ThetfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Barbet-Massin M, Thuiller W, Jiguet F (2012) The fate of European breeding birds under climate, land-use and dispersal scenarios. Glob Chang Biol 18:881–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beale CM, Burfield IJ, Sim IMW, Pearce-Higgins JW RGW, Grant MC (2006) Climate change may account for the decline in British ring ouzels Turdus torquatus. J Anim Ecol 75:826–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F (2012) Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett 15:365–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bivand RG, Pebesma EJ, Gómez-Rubio V (2008) Applied spatial data analysis with R. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of upland forest communities of southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:325–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Carroll MJ, Dennis P, Pearce-Higgins JW, Thomas CD (2011) Maintaining northern peatland ecosystems in a changing climate: effects of soil moisture, drainage and drain blocking on craneflies. Glob Chang Biol 17:2991–3001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chamberlain DE, Fuller RJ (2001) Contrasting patterns of change in distribution and abundance of farmland birds in relation to farming system in lowland Britain. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:399–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Charmantier A, McCleery RH, Cole LR, Perrins C, Kruuk LEB, Sheldon BC (2008) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in response to climate change in a wild bird population. Science 320:800–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Core Team R (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 6 July 2017Google Scholar
  16. Davey CM, Chamberlain DE, Newson SE, Noble DG, Johnston A (2012) Rise of the generalists: evidence for climate driven homogenization in avian communities. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21:568–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davey CM, Devictor V, Jonzén N, Lindström Å, Smith HG (2013) Impact of climate change on communities: revealing species’ contribution. Journal of Anim Ecol 82:551–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Devictor V, van Swaay C, Brereton T et al (2012) Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nat Clim Chang 2:121–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eaton MA, Aebischer NJ, Brown AF, Hearn RD, Lock L, Musgrove AJ, Noble DG, Stroud DA, Gregory RD (2015) Birds of Conservation Concern 4: the population status of birds in the UK, Channel Islands and Isle of Man. Brit Birds 108:708–746Google Scholar
  20. European Bird Census Council (2015) Common bird monitoring schemes in Europe http://www.ebcc.info/index.php?a=cat.13. Accessed 6 July 2017
  21. European Environment Agency (2012) Corine Land Cover 2006 raster data http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/corine-land-cover-2006-raster-2. Accessed 6 July 2017
  22. Fuller RJ (2012) Birds and habitat: relationships in changing landscapes. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fuller RJ, Noble DG, Smith KW, Vanhinsbergh D (2005) Recent declines in populations of woodland birds in Britain: a review of possible causes. Brit Birds 98:116–143Google Scholar
  24. Gillings S, Balmer DE, Fuller RJ (2015) Directionality of recent bird distribution shifts and climate change in Great Britain. Glob Chang Biol 21:2155–2168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grömping U (2009) Variable importance assessment in regression: linear regression versus random forest. Am Stat 63:308–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research (2008) UKCP09, Met Office Hadley Centre Regional Climate Model (HadRM3-PPE) Data. NCAS British Atmospheric Data CentreGoogle Scholar
  28. Hagemeijer EJM, Blair MJ (eds) (1997) The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: their distribution and abundance. T & A D Poyser, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris S, Massimino D, Newson SE, Eaton MA, Marchant JH, Balmer DE, Noble DG, Gillings S, Procter D, Pearce-Higgins JW (2016) The Breeding Bird Survey 2015, BTO Research Report 687. British Trust for Ornithology, ThetfordGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrison PJ, Yuan Y, Buckland ST, Oedekoven CS, Elston DA, Brewer MJ, Johnston A, Pearce-Higgins JW (2016) Quantifying turnover in biodiversity of British breeding birds. J Appl Ecol 53:469–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hiley JR, Bradbury RB, Holling M, Thomas CD (2013) Protected areas act as establishment centres for species colonising the United Kingdom. Proc R Soc B 280:20122310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howard C, Stephens PA, Pearce-Higgins JW, Gregory RD, Willis SG (2014) Improving species distribution models: the value of data on abundance. Methods Ecol Evol 5:506–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Huntley B, Green RE, Collingham YC, Willis SG (2007) A Climatic Atlas of European Breeding Birds. Lynx Edicions, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  35. IPCC (2000) Emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  37. Jacobson MZ (2005) Fundamentals of atmospheric modeling. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jarema SI, Samson J, McGill BJ, Humphries MM (2009) Variation in abundance across a species’ range predicts climate range responses in the range interior will exceed those at the edge: a case study with North American beaver. Glob Change Biol 15:508–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jetz W, Wilcove DS, Dobson AP (2007) Projected impacts of climate change and land-use change on the global biodiversity of birds. PLoS Biol 5:e157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jiguet F, Devictor V, Julliard R, Couvet D (2012) French citizens monitoring ordinary birds provide tools for conservation and ecological sciences. Acta Oecol 44:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnston A, Ausden M, Dodd AM et al (2013) Observed and predicted effects of climate change on species abundance in protected areas. Nat Clim Chang 3:1055–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones PD, Harris I (2013) CRU TS3.21: climatic research unit (CRU) time-series (TS) version 3.21 of high resolution gridded data of month-by-month variation in climate (Jan. 1901–Dec. 2012), NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre, 24 September 2013.  https://doi.org/10.5285/D0E1585D-3417-485F-87AE-4FCECF10A992 Google Scholar
  43. Le Viol I, Jiguet F, Brotons L, Herrando S, Lindström Å, Pearce-Higgins JW, Reif J, Van Turnhout C, Devictor V (2012) More and more generalists: two decades of changes in the European avifauna. Biol Lett 8:780–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lindström Å, Green M, Paulson G, Smith HG, Devictor V (2013) Rapid changes in bird community composition at multiple temporal and spatial scales in response to recent climate change. Ecography 36:313–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Massimino D, Johnston A, Pearce-Higgins JW (2015) The geographical range of British birds expands during 15 years of warming. Bird Study 62:523–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. O’Grady JJ, Reed DH, Brook BW, Frankham R (2004) What are the best correlates of predicted extinction risk? Biol Conserv 118:513–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oedekoven CS, Elston DA, Harrison PJ, Brewer MJ, Buckland ST, Johnston A, Foster S, Pearce-Higgins JW (2017) Attributing changes in the distribution of species abundance to weather variables using the example of British breeding birds. Methods Ecol Evol (in press)Google Scholar
  49. Oliver TH, Gillings S, Pearce-Higgins JW, Brereton T, Crick HQP, Duffield S, Morecroft MD, Roy DB (2017) Large extents of intensive land use limit community reorganisation during climate warming. Glob Chang Biol 23:2272–2283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pearce-Higgins JW, Beale CM, Oliver TH et al (2017) A national-scale assessment of climate change impacts on species: assessing the balance of risks and opportunities for multiple taxa. Biol Conserv 213:124–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pearce-Higgins JW, Eglington SM, Martay B, Chamberlain DE (2015) Drivers of climate change impacts on bird communities. J Anim Ecol 84:943–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pearce-Higgins JW, Green RE (2014) Birds and climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Renwick AR, Massimino D, Newson SE, Chamberlain DE, Pearce-Higgins JW, Johnston A (2012) Modelling changes in species’ abundance in response to projected climate change. Divers Distrib 18:121–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sexton DMH, Harris G, Murphy J (2010) UKCP09: spatially coherent projections. Met Office Hadley Centre, ExeterGoogle Scholar
  55. Shoo LP, Williams SE, Hero JM (2005) Climate warming and the rainforest birds of the Australian wet tropics: using abundance data as a sensitive predictor of change in total population size. Biol Conserv 125:335–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE et al (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thuiller W (2003) BIOMOD—optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting future shifts under global change. Glob Change Biol 9:1353–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. United States Geological Survey (1996) Global 30 Arc-Second Elevation (GTOPO30) https://lta.cr.usgs.gov/GTOPO30. Accessed 6 July 2017
  59. Vos CC, Berry P, Opdam P, Baveco H, Nijhof B, O’Hanley J, Bell C, Kuipers H (2008) Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones. J Appl Ecol 45:1722–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wiens JA, Stralberg D, Jongsomjit D, Howell CA, Snyder MA (2009) Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 106:19729–19736CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.British Trust for OrnithologyThetfordUK
  2. 2.Cornell Lab of OrnithologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  3. 3.Conservation Science Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
  4. 4.Centre d’Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation UMR7204 Sorbonne Universités-MNHN-CNRS-UPMC CP135ParisFrance

Personalised recommendations