Climatic Change

, Volume 142, Issue 3–4, pp 391–406 | Cite as

Economic growth and global particulate pollution concentrations

Article

Abstract

PM2.5 is a pollutant that is very hazardous to human health and potentially an important source of radiative forcing. We estimate the effect of economic growth on changes in PM2.5 pollution in a global panel of 151 countries between 1990 and 2010. We find that economic growth has positive though relatively small effects on pollution concentrations when we control for other relevant variables including the movement of pollution across international borders. Contrary to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis, there is no in-sample income turning point after which growth reduces pollution concentrations. Though the EKC was originally developed to model the ambient concentrations of pollutants, most subsequent applications focused on pollution emissions. Despite this, previous research suggests that it is more likely that economic growth could eventually reduce the concentrations of local pollutants than emissions. Our results throw further doubt on the idea that economic growth can eventually reduce environmental impacts including climate change.

Supplementary material

10584_2017_1955_MOESM1_ESM.docx (149 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 148 kb)

References

  1. Angrist JD, Pischke J-S (2010) The credibility revolution in empirical economics: how better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J Econ Perspect 24(2):3–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond TC, Doherty SJ, Fahey DW, Forster PM, Berntsen T, DeAngelo BJ, Flanner MG, Ghan S, Kärcher B, Koch D, Kinne S, Kondo Y, Quinn PK, Sarofim MC, Schultz MG, Schulz M, Venkataraman C, Zhang H, Zhang S, Bellouin N, Guttikunda SK, Hopke PK, Jacobson MZ, Kaiser JW, Klimont Z, Lohmann U, Schwarz JP, Shindell D, Storelvmo T, Warren SG, Zender CS (2013) Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. J Geophys Res-Atmos 118(11):5380–5552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boys B, Martin RV, van Donkelaar A, MacDonell R, Hsu NC, Cooper MJ et al (2014) Fifteen year global time series of satellite-derived fine particulate matter. Environ Sci Technol 48:11109–11118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brajer V, Mead RW, Xiao F (2011) Searching for an environmental Kuznets curve in China’s air pollution. China Econ Rev 22:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brauer M, Amann M, Burnett RT, Cohen A, Dentener F, Ezzati M, Henderson SB, Krzyzanowski M, Martin RV, Van Dingenen R, Van Donkelaar A, Thurston GD (2012) Exposure assessment for estimation of the global burden of disease attributable to outdoor air pollution. Environ Sci Technol 46(2):652–660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brauer M, Freedman G, Frostad J, van Donkelaar A et al (2016) Ambient air pollution exposure estimation for the global burden of disease 2013. Environ Sci Technol 50(1):79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buse A (1973) Goodness of fit in generalized least squares estimation. Am Stat 27(3):106–108Google Scholar
  9. Carson RT (2010) The environmental Kuznets curve: seeking empirical regularity and theoretical structure. Rev Environ Econ Policy 4(1):3–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Csereklyei Z, Stern DI (2015) Global energy use: decoupling or convergence? Energy Econ 51:633–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ezcurra R (2007) Is there cross-country convergence in carbon dioxide emissions? Energy Policy 35:1363–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fingleton B, Le Gallo J (2008) Estimating spatial models with endogenous variables, a spatial lag and spatially dependent disturbances: finite sample properties. Pap Reg Sci 87(3):319–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fredriksson PG, Wollscheid JR (2015) Legal origins and climate change policies in former colonies. Environ Resour Econ 62(2):309–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Papers 3914Google Scholar
  15. Hao Y, Liu Y-M (2016) The influential factors of urban PM 2.5 concentrations in China: a spatial econometric analysis. J Clean Prod 112:1443–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harbaugh W, Levinson A, Wilson D (2002) Re-examining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Review of Economics and Statistics 84(3):541–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keene A, Deller SC (2015) Evidence of the environmental Kuznets’ curve among US counties and the impact of social capital. Int Reg Sci Rev 38(4):358–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2008) The economic consequences of legal origins. J Econ Lit 46(2):285–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maddala GS (1977) Econometrics. McGraw-Hill, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  20. Ordás Criado C, Valente S, Stengos T (2011) Growth and pollution convergence: theory and evidence. J Environ Econ Manag 62:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Osterman K, Brauer M (2001) Air quality during haze episodes and its impact on health. In: Eaton P, Radojevic M (eds) Forest fires and regional haze in Southeast Asia. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 195–226Google Scholar
  22. Pettersson F, Maddison D, Acar S, Söderholm P (2013) Convergence of carbon dioxide emissions: a review of the literature. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics 7:141–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rockey J, Temple J (2016) Growth econometrics for agnostics and true believers. Eur Econ Rev 81:86–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Romano JP, Wolf M (2014) Resurrecting weighted least squares. University of Zurich, Department of Economics, Working Paper Series 172Google Scholar
  25. Sala-i-Martin X, Doppelhofer G, Miller RI (2004) Determinants of long-term growth: a Bayesian averaging of classical estimates (BACE) approach. Am Econ Rev 94(4):813–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sanchez LF, Stern DI (2016) Drivers of industrial and non-industrial greenhouse gas emissions. Ecol Econ 124:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Selden TM, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution? Journal of Environmental Economics and Environmental Management 27:147–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxf Econ Pap 46:757–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stern DI (1994) Historical path-dependence of the urban population density gradient. Ann Reg Sci 28:197–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stern DI (2004) The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Dev 32(8):1419–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stern DI (2005) Beyond the environmental Kuznets curve: diffusion of sulfur-emissions-abating technology. Journal of Environment and Development 14(1):101–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stern DI (2010) Between estimates of the emissions-income elasticity. Ecol Econ 69:2173–2182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stern DI (2012) Modeling international trends in energy efficiency. Energy Econ 34:2200–2208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stern DI, Common MS, Barbier EB (1996) Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Dev 24:1151–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stern DI, Gerlagh R, Burke PJ (2017) Modeling the emissions-income relationship using long-run growth rates. Environment and Development Economics (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Stern DI, Zha D (2016) Economic growth and particulate pollution concentrations in China. Environ Econ Policy Stud 18:327–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stock JH, Yogo M (2005) Testing for weak instruments in IV regression. In: Andrews DWK, Stock JH (eds) Identification and inference for econometric models: a Festschrift in honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 80–108Google Scholar
  38. van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Brauer M, Boys BL (2015) Use of satellite observations for long-term exposure assessment of global concentrations of fine particulate matter. Environ Health Perspect 123(2):135–143Google Scholar
  39. Victor DG, Zaelke D, Ramanathan V (2015) Soot and short-lived pollutants provide political opportunity. Nat Clim Chang 5:796–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Viidanoja J, Sillanpää M, Laakia J, Kerminen V-M, Hillamo R, Aarnio P, Koskentalo T (2002) Organic and black carbon in PM2.5 and PM10: 1 year of data from an urban site in Helsinki, Finland. Atmos Environ 36(19):3183–3193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vollebergh HRJ, Melenberg B, Dijkgraaf E (2009) Identifying reduced-form relations with panel data: the case of pollution and income. J Environ Econ Manag 58(1):27–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner M (2008) The carbon Kuznets curve: a cloudy picture emitted by bad econometrics. Resour Energy Econ 30:388–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagner M (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve, cointegration and nonlinearity. J Appl Econ 30(6):948–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. WHO (2013) Health effects of particulate matter. World Health Organisation, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  45. Wigley TML, Raper SCB (1992) Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios. Nature 357:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Crawford School of Public PolicyThe Australian National UniversityActonAustralia

Personalised recommendations