Rapid scale-up of negative emissions technologies: social barriers and social implications
- 2k Downloads
Negative emissions technologies have garnered increasing attention in the wake of the Paris target to curb global warming to 1.5 °C. However, much of the literature on carbon dioxide removal focuses on technical feasibility, and several significant social barriers to scale-up of these technologies have been glossed over. This paper reviews the existing literature on the social implications of rapidly ramping up carbon dioxide removal. It also explores the applicability of previous empirical social science research on intersecting topics, with examples drawn from research on first- and second-generation biofuels and forest carbon projects. Social science fieldwork and case studies of land use change, agricultural and energy system change, and technology adoption and diffusion can help in both anticipating the social implications of emerging negative emissions technologies and understanding the factors that shape trajectories of technological development. By integrating empirical research on public and producer perceptions, barriers to adoption, conditions driving new technologies, and social impacts, projections about negative emissions technologies can become more realistic and more useful to climate change policymaking.
KeywordsCarbon dioxide removal Negative emissions Food systems Direct air capture BECCS
Many thanks to the reviewers, to former colleagues at the Institute of Advanced Sustainability Studies in Potsdam for critical discussions, to the Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment at American University, and to Charles Geisler.
- Bauer N (2015) Power systems: carbon negative at the regional level. Nat Clim Chang 5(3):196–197Google Scholar
- Corry O (2014) Climate engineering and the contraption fallacy. Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment, http://dcgeoconsortium.org/2014/05/06/guest-post-olaf-corry-open-university-climate-engineering-and-the-contraption-fallacy/, accessed 3 May 2016.
- Cotula L, Dyer N, Vermeulen S (2008) Fuelling exclusion? The biofuels boom and poor people’s access to land. IIED, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Gallagher E (2008) The Gallagher review of the indirect effects of biofuels production. Renewable Fuels Agency, July 2008, http://www.renewablefuelsagency.org/reportsandpublications/reviewoftheindirecteffectsofbiofuels.cfm.
- German L, Schoneveld GC, Pacheco P (2011) Local social and environmental impacts of biofuels: global comparative assessment and implications for governance. Ecol Soc 16(4): 29.Google Scholar
- Hunsberger C, et al (2015). Land-based climate change mitigation, land grabbing and conflict: understanding intersections and linkages, exploring actions for change. MOSAIC Working Paper Series No. 1.Google Scholar
- IPCC (2014) : Summary for Policymakers. In: Edenhofer O et al. (eds) In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press,, Cambridge, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
- Leach M, Fairhead J, Fraser J (2012) Green grabs and biochar: revaluing African soils and farming in the new carbon economy, J Peasant Stud, 39, (2):285–307Google Scholar
- Markusson N, Shackley S, Evar B (2012a) The social dynamics of carbon capture and storage: understanding CCS representations, governance, and innovation. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- McLaren D (2014) Capturing the Imagination: Prospects for Direct Air Capture as a Climate Measure. Forthcoming in Geoengineering our Climate: Ethics, Policy, and GovernanceGoogle Scholar
- National Academies of Science (2015) Climate Intervention: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Reliable Sequestration. doi: 10.17226/18805
- Peters G (2016) The ‘best available science’ to inform 1.5 °C policy choices. Nat Clim Change. Google Scholar
- Shete M, Rutten M (2014) Biofuel feedstock production in Ethiopia: Status, challenges and contributions. In: Akinyoade A et al. (eds) In Digging Deeper: Inside Africa’s Agricultural, Food and Nutrition Dynamics. Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar
- Vaughan N and Gough C (2015) Synthesizing existing knowledge on feasibility of BECCS: Workshop report.Google Scholar