Climatic Change

, Volume 138, Issue 3–4, pp 491–504 | Cite as

Stormwater management and climate change: vulnerability and capacity for adaptation in urban and suburban contexts

  • Trisha L. MooreEmail author
  • John S. Gulliver
  • Latham Stack
  • Michael H. Simpson


Managing stormwater under climate uncertainty is a concern in both built-out communities and those continuing to undergo land use change. In this study, a suite of climate change scenarios were developed to represent a probable range of change in the 10-year recurrence interval design storm. The Environmental Protection Agency’s Stormwater Management Model was used to predict flooding due to undersized drainage components within watersheds representing a traditional, built-out urban area and a developing suburban area with intact green infrastructure corridors. Despite undersized infrastructure and flooding in both study watersheds, the risk of property damage in the suburban watershed was negligible across the range of scenarios even at projected build-out, due in part to flood storage capacity of the green infrastructure network. Adaptation approaches – including pipe upsizing, underground storage, and bioinfiltration – and costs were also modeled in both watersheds. In the built-out site, bioinfiltration practices were predicted to moderate both flooding and total adaptation costs even when implemented over a relatively modest (10 %) portion of the watershed; however, a substantial upgrade to gray stormwater infrastructure (pipes and storage chambers) was also needed to mitigate impacts. In the urbanizing community, maintaining an intact green infrastructure network was surmised to be the most cost-effective approach for enhancing the resilience of urban stormwater systems to climate uncertainties and urbanization.


Green infrastructure Design storm Bioinfiltration Adaptation costs 



This work was supported by the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, SARP program under Grant 2202405. The authors also thank the Cities of Minneapolis and Victoria and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their help and cooperation throughout the duration of the study, and Matthew Price for assisting with preparation of figures.

Supplementary material

10584_2016_1766_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2.3 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 2358 kb)


  1. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Glob Environ Chang 15(2):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson E, Barthel S, Borgström S, Colding J, Elmqvist T, Folke C, Gren Å (2014) Reconnecting cities to the biosphere: stewardship of green infrastructure and urban ecosystem services. Ambio 43(4):445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blanc J, Hall JW, Roche N, Dawson RJ, Cesses Y, Burton A, Kilsby CG (2012) Enhanced efficiency of pluvial flood risk estimation in urban areas using spatial-temporal rainfall simulations. J Flood Risk Manage 5:143–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carmin JA, Nadkarni N, Rhie C (2012) Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  5. CRWD (2012) BMP performance and cost benefit analysis: Arlington-Pascal project. Capital Region Watershed District, St. Paul, MN. Retreived from Accessed 03 Oct 2013
  6. Dawson RJ, Speight L, Hall JW, Djordjevic S, Savic D (2008) attribution of flood risk in urban areas. J Hydroinformatics 10(4):275–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Denault C, Millar RJ, Lence BJ (2002) Climate change and drainage infrastructure capacity in an urban catchment. Annual conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. Montreal, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  8. Diaz-Nieto J, Wilby RL (2005) A comparison of statistical downscaling and climate change factor methods: impacts on low flows in the river Thames. Clim Chang 69:245–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dibike YB, Gachon P, St-Hilaire A, Ouarda TBMJ, Nguyen VTV (2008) Uncertainty analysis of statistically downscaled temperature and precipitation regimes in northern Canada. Theor Appl Climatol 91:149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eckart J, Sieker H, Vairavamoorthy K (2010) Flexible urban drainage systems Water Pract Technol:5(4). doi: 10.2166/WPT.2010.072
  11. Gaffin SR, Rosenzweig C, Kong AYY (2012) Adapting to climate change through urban green infrastructure. Nat Clim Chang 2(10):704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gersonius B, Nasruddin F, Ashley R, Jeuken A, Pathirana A, Zevenbergen C (2012) Developing the evidence base for mainstreaming adaptation of stormwater systems to climate change. Water Res 46:6824–6835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gill SE, Handley JF, Ennos AR, Pauleit S (2007) Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. Built Environ 33(1):115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haasnoot M, Kwakkel JH, Walker WE, ter Maat J (2013) Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decision for a deeply uncertain world. Glob Environ Chang 23:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heidrich O, Dawson RJ, Reckien D, Walsh CL (2013) Assessment of the climate preparedness of 30 urban areas in the UK. Clim Chang 120(4):771–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hershfield DM (1961) Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States with Durations from 30 Minutes to 24 Hours and Return Periods from 1 to 100 years: Technical Paper No. 40. US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Horton R, Rosenzweig C, Gornitz V, Bader D, O'Grady M (2010) Climate risk information: climate change scenarios and implications for NYC infrastructure. New York City Panel on Climate Change. Ann NY Academy Sci 1196(1):147–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (2005) Regional frequency analysis: an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press 244 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Katz RW (2010) Statistics of extremes in climate change. Clim Chang 100(1):71–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kendon EJ, Roberts NM, Fowler HJ, Roberts MJ, Chan SJ, Senior CA (2014) Heavier summer downpours with climate change revealed by weather forecast resolution model. Nat Clim Chang 4:570–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NRCS (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds: Technical Release 55. United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Perica S, Martin D, Pavlovic S, Roy I, St. Laurent M, Trypaluk C, Unruh D, Yekta M, Bonnin G (2013) NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the United States Vol. 8 Version 2.0. Silver Spring, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson TC, Karl TR, Kossin JP, Kunkel KE, Lawrimore JH, McMahon JR, Vose RS, Yin X (2014) Changes in weather and climate extremes: state of knowledge relevant to air and water quality in the United States. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 64(2):184–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Qin H, Li Z, Fu G (2013) The effects of low impact development of urban flooding under different rainfall characteristics. J Environ Manag 129:577–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenberg EA, Keys PW, Booth DB, Hartley D, Burkey J, Steinemann AC, Lettenmaier DP (2010) Precipitation extremes and the impacts of climate change on stormwater infrastructure in Washington state. Clim Chang 102(1–2):319–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rossman LA (2010) Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual Version 50. EPA/600/R-05/040 US EPA, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  27. Semandeni-Davies A, Hernebring C, Svensson G, Gustafsson L (2008) The impacts of climate change and urbanization on drainage in Helsingborg, Sweden: combined sewer system. J Hydrol 350(1–2):100–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Waters D, Watt WE, Marsalek J, Anderson BC (2003) Adaptation of a storm drainage system to accommodate increased rainfall resulting from climate change. J Environ Plan Manag 46(5):755–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Weiss PT, Gulliver JS, Erickson AJ (2007) Cost and Pollutant Removal of Storm-Water Treatment Practices. J Water Res Pl 133(3):218–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wernstedt K, Carlet F (2014) Climate change, urban development, and stormwater: perspectives from the field. J Water Resour Plan Manag 140(4):543–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Willems P, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, Olsson J, Nguyen VTV (2012) Climate change impact assessment on urban rainfall extremes and urban drainage: methods and shortcomings. Atmos Res 103:106–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zahmatkesh Z, Burian SJ, Karamouz M, Tavakol-Davani H, Goharian E (2015) Low-impact development practices to mitigate climate change effects on urban stormwater runoff: case study of New York City. J Irrig Drain Eng 141(1), 04014043Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Trisha L. Moore
    • 1
    Email author
  • John S. Gulliver
    • 2
  • Latham Stack
    • 3
  • Michael H. Simpson
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Biological and Agricultural EngineeringKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Syntectic International, LLCPortlandUSA
  4. 4.Department of Environmental StudiesAntioch University New EnglandKeeneUSA

Personalised recommendations