Stormwater management and climate change: vulnerability and capacity for adaptation in urban and suburban contexts
- 1.9k Downloads
Managing stormwater under climate uncertainty is a concern in both built-out communities and those continuing to undergo land use change. In this study, a suite of climate change scenarios were developed to represent a probable range of change in the 10-year recurrence interval design storm. The Environmental Protection Agency’s Stormwater Management Model was used to predict flooding due to undersized drainage components within watersheds representing a traditional, built-out urban area and a developing suburban area with intact green infrastructure corridors. Despite undersized infrastructure and flooding in both study watersheds, the risk of property damage in the suburban watershed was negligible across the range of scenarios even at projected build-out, due in part to flood storage capacity of the green infrastructure network. Adaptation approaches – including pipe upsizing, underground storage, and bioinfiltration – and costs were also modeled in both watersheds. In the built-out site, bioinfiltration practices were predicted to moderate both flooding and total adaptation costs even when implemented over a relatively modest (10 %) portion of the watershed; however, a substantial upgrade to gray stormwater infrastructure (pipes and storage chambers) was also needed to mitigate impacts. In the urbanizing community, maintaining an intact green infrastructure network was surmised to be the most cost-effective approach for enhancing the resilience of urban stormwater systems to climate uncertainties and urbanization.
KeywordsGreen infrastructure Design storm Bioinfiltration Adaptation costs
This work was supported by the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, SARP program under Grant 2202405. The authors also thank the Cities of Minneapolis and Victoria and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District for their help and cooperation throughout the duration of the study, and Matthew Price for assisting with preparation of figures.
- Carmin JA, Nadkarni N, Rhie C (2012) Progress and Challenges in Urban Climate Adaptation Planning: Results of a Global Survey. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- CRWD (2012) BMP performance and cost benefit analysis: Arlington-Pascal project. Capital Region Watershed District, St. Paul, MN. Retreived from http://www.capitolregionwd.org. Accessed 03 Oct 2013
- Denault C, Millar RJ, Lence BJ (2002) Climate change and drainage infrastructure capacity in an urban catchment. Annual conference of the Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. Montreal, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Eckart J, Sieker H, Vairavamoorthy K (2010) Flexible urban drainage systems Water Pract Technol:5(4). doi: 10.2166/WPT.2010.072
- Hershfield DM (1961) Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States with Durations from 30 Minutes to 24 Hours and Return Periods from 1 to 100 years: Technical Paper No. 40. US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Hosking JRM, Wallis JR (2005) Regional frequency analysis: an approach based on L-moments. Cambridge University Press 244 pp.Google Scholar
- NRCS (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds: Technical Release 55. United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Perica S, Martin D, Pavlovic S, Roy I, St. Laurent M, Trypaluk C, Unruh D, Yekta M, Bonnin G (2013) NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the United States Vol. 8 Version 2.0. Silver Spring, MarylandGoogle Scholar
- Rossman LA (2010) Storm Water Management Model User’s Manual Version 50. EPA/600/R-05/040 US EPA, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
- Zahmatkesh Z, Burian SJ, Karamouz M, Tavakol-Davani H, Goharian E (2015) Low-impact development practices to mitigate climate change effects on urban stormwater runoff: case study of New York City. J Irrig Drain Eng 141(1), 04014043Google Scholar