Climatic Change

, Volume 138, Issue 3–4, pp 411–424

User comments on climate stories: impacts of anecdotal vs. scientific evidence

Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10584-016-1759-1

Cite this article as:
Hinnant, A., Subramanian, R. & Young, R. Climatic Change (2016) 138: 411. doi:10.1007/s10584-016-1759-1

Abstract

Stories about climate change garner passionate comments from readers, ranging from acclaim to invective. This research is the first to investigate the effects of the rhetorical strategies of deploying anecdotal versus scientific evidence in comments. A between-subjects experiment with a U.S. adult sample (N = 363) tested whether user comments that support or contradict a climate news story, using either anecdotal or scientific evidence, have an effect on message reception. Individual difference variables in audience members have been shown to moderate the effects of comments in previous research. Findings show that political ideology is an important moderator of effects, particularly on the perception of climate change risk and story credibility. And when looking at the reactions of people who have low need for cognition and are highly conservative, climate uncertainty was diminished when anecdotal evidence appeared in comments. Taken together, these findings indicate that, in the context of climate change communication, comments from users can influence whether a climate story is perceived as credible by certain readers and can also disrupt a story’s intended message, particularly if comments attempt to invoke scientific proof for their claims.

Supplementary material

10584_2016_1759_MOESM1_ESM.docx (9.3 mb)
ESM 1(DOCX 9514 kb)

Funding information

Funder NameGrant NumberFunding Note
University of Missouri

    Copyright information

    © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. 1.University of Missouri ColumbiaColumbiaUSA
    2. 2.University of IowaIowa CityUSA

    Personalised recommendations