Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 144, Issue 3, pp 535–548 | Cite as

Uncertainties in historical changes and future projections of drought. Part II: model-simulated historical and future drought changes

  • Tianbao ZhaoEmail author
  • Aiguo DaiEmail author
Article

Abstract

While most models project large increases in agricultural drought frequency and severity in the 21st century, significant uncertainties exist in these projections. Here, we compare the model-simulated changes with observation-based estimates since 1900 and examine model projections from both the Coupled Model Inter-comparison Project Phase 3 (CMIP3) and Phase 5 (CMIP5). We use the self-calibrated Palmer Drought Severity Index with the Penman-Monteith potential evapotranspiration (PET) (sc_PDSI_pm) as a measure of agricultural drought. Results show that estimated long-term changes in global and hemispheric drought areas from 1900 to 2014 are consistent with the CMIP3 and CMIP5 model-simulated response to historical greenhouse gases and other external forcing, with the short-term variations within the model spread of internal variability, despite that regional changes are still dominated by internal variability. Both the CMIP3 and CMIP5 models project continued increases (by 50–200 % in a relative sense) in the 21st century in global agricultural drought frequency and area even under low-moderate emissions scenarios, resulting from a decrease in the mean and flattening of the probability distribution functions (PDFs) of the sc_PDSI_pm. This flattening is especially pronounced over the Northern Hemisphere land, leading to increased drought frequency even over areas with increasing sc_PDSI_pm. Large differences exist in the CMIP3 and CMIP5 model-projected precipitation and drought changes over the Sahel and northern Australia due to uncertainties in simulating the African Inter-tropical convergence zone (ITCZ) and the subsidence zone over northern Australia, while the wetting trend over East Africa reflects a robust response of the Indian Ocean ITCZ seen in both the CMIP3 and CMIP5 models. While warming-induced PET increases over all latitudes and precipitation decreases over subtropical land are responsible for mean sc_PDSI_pm decreases, the exact cause of its PDF flattening needs further investigation.

Keywords

Palmer Drought Severity Index CMIP5 Model Drought Frequency Agricultural Drought Internal Climate Variability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Key Basic Research Program of China (Grant No.2012CB956203), U.S. National Science Foundation (Grant #AGS-1353740), U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science (Award #DE-SC0012602), and U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Award #NA15OAR4310086).

References

  1. Burke EJ, Brown SJ (2008) Evaluating uncertainties in the projection of future drought. J Hydrometeorol 9:292–299. doi: 10.1175/2007JHM929.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burke EJ, Brown SJ, Christidis N (2006) Modeling the recent evolution of global drought and projections for the twenty-first century with the hadley centre climate model. J Hydrometeorol 7:1113–1125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cook BI, Smerdon JE, Seager R, Coats S (2014) Global warming and 21st century drying. Clim Dyn 43:2607–2627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cook BI, Ault TR, Smerdon JE (2015) Unprecedented 21st-century drought risk in the American Southwest and Central Plains. Sci Avd 1:e1400082Google Scholar
  5. Dai A (2011a) Characteristics and trends in various forms of the palmer drought severity index during 1900–2008. J Geophys Res 116:D12115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dai A (2011b) Drought under global warming: a review. WIREs Clim Change 2:45–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai A (2013a) Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nat Clim Chang 3:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai A (2013b) The influence of the inter-decadal Pacific Oscillation on U.S. precipitation during 1923–2010. Clim Dyn 41:633–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai A, Zhao T (2016) Uncertainties in historical changes and future projections of Drought. Part I: Uncertainties in estimating historical drought changes. Clim Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1705-2 Google Scholar
  10. Dai A, Trenberth KE, Karl TR (1998) Global variations in droughts and wet spells: 1900–1995. Geophys Res Lett 25:3367–3370. doi: 10.1029/98GL52511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dai A, Trenberth KE, Qian T (2004) A global dataset of palmer drought severity index for 1870–2002: relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming. J Hydrometeorol 5:1117–1130. doi: 10.1175/JHM-386.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dai A, Fyfe JC, Xie S-P, Dai X (2015) Decadal modulation of global surface temperature by internal climate variability. Nat Clim Chang 5:555–559. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2605 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong B, Dai A (2015) The influence of the Inter-decadal Pacific Oscillation on temperature and precipitation over the globe. Clim Dyn 45:2667–2681. doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1446-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hobbins MT, Dai A, Roderick ML, Farquhar GD (2008) Revisiting potential evapotranspiration parameterizations as drivers of long-term water balance trends. Geophys Res Lett 35:L12403. doi: 10.1029/2008GL033840 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IPCC (2007) In: Solomon S et al. (eds) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2013) In: TE S et al. (eds) Climate Change 2013: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, et al. (2007) In: Solomon S et al. (eds) Global Climate Projections. Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, pp. 746–845Google Scholar
  18. Palmer WC (1965) Meteorological drought. US Weather Bureau Research Paper 45: 55 ppGoogle Scholar
  19. Prudhomme C et al. (2014) Hydrological droughts in the 21st century, hotspots and uncertainties from a global multimodel ensemble experiment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:3262–3267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222473110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rind D, Goldberg R, Hansen J, Rosenzweig C, Ruedy R (1990) Potential evapotranspiration and the likelihood of future drought. J Geophys Res 95:9983–10004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rowell D, Booth B, Nicholson S, Good P (2015) Reconciling past and future rainfall trends over East Africa. J Clim 28(24):9768–9788. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0140.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sheffield J, Wood EF (2008) Projected changes in drought occurrence under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario, IPCC AR4 simulations. Clim Dyn 31:79–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheffield J, Wood EF, Roderick ML (2012) Little change in global drought over the past 60 years. Nature 491(7424):435–438. doi: 10.1038/nature11575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Street JO, Carroll RJ, Ruppert D (1988) A note on computing robust regression estimates via iteratively reweighted least squares. Am Stat 42:152–154Google Scholar
  25. Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Taylor IH, Burke E, McColl L, Falloon PD, Harris GR, McNeall D (2013) The impact of climate mitigation on projections of future drought. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17:2339–2358. doi: 10.5194/hess-17-2339-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Trenberth KE, Dai A, van der Schrier G, Jones PD, Barichivich J, Briffa KR, Sheffield J (2014) Global warming and changes in drought. Nat Clim Chang 4:17–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van der Schrier G, Efthymiadis D, Briffa KR, Jones PD (2007) European Alpine moisture variability for 1800–2003. Int J Climatol 27:415–427. doi: 10.1002/joc.1411 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van der Schrier G, Jones PD, Briffa KR (2011) The sensitivity of the PDSI to the Thornthwaite and Penman-Monteith parameterizations for potential evapotranspiration. J Geophys Res Atmos 116:D03106. doi: 10.1029/2010JD015001 Google Scholar
  30. van der Schrier G, Barichivich J, Briffa KR, Jones PD (2013) A scPDSI-based global data set of dry and wet spells for 1901–2009. J Geophys Res Atmos 118:4025–4048. doi: 10.1002/jgrd.50355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van Vuuren DP et al. (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Dyn 109:5–31Google Scholar
  32. Wang GL (2005) Agricultural drought in a future climate: results from 15 global climate models participating in the IPCC 4th assessment. Clim Dyn 25:739–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wehner M, Easterling DR, Lawrimore JH, Heim RR, Vose RS, Santer BD (2011) Projections of future drought in the continental United States and Mexico. J Hydrometeorol 12:1359–1377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wells N, Goddard S, Hayes MJ (2004) A self-calibrating Palmer drought severity index. J Clim 17:2335–2351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yang W, Seager R, Cane MA, Bradfield Lyon B (2014) The East African long rains in observations and models. J Clim 27:7185–7202. doi: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00447.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhai J, Su B, Krysanova V, Vetter T, Gao C, Jiang T (2010) Spatial variation and trends in PDSI and SPI indices and their relation to streamflow in 10 large regions of China. J Clim 23:649–663. doi: 10.1175/2009JCLI2968.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao T, Dai A (2015) The magnitude and causes of global drought changes in the 21st century under a low–moderate emissions scenario. J Clim 28:4490–4512CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Regional Climate-Environment Research for East AsiaInstitute of Atmospheric Physics (IAP), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)BeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of Atmospheric and Environmental SciencesUniversity at Albany, SUNYAlbanyUSA
  3. 3.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations