Climatic Change

, Volume 137, Issue 3–4, pp 329–332 | Cite as

Response to commentary by J. L. Bamber, W. P. Aspinall and R. M. Cooke (2016)

Response

Abstract

In a commentary paper, Bamber et al. (Nat Clim Change 3:424–427, 2016) respond to our recent assessment (De Vries and Van de Wal Clim Change 1–14, 2015) of their expert judgment based study on projections of future sea level rise due to the melting of the large ice sheets (Bamber and Aspinall Nat Clim Chang 3:424–427, 2013). In this response we comment on their remarks.

References

  1. Bamber JL, Aspinall WP (2013) An expert judgment assessment of future sea level rise from the ice sheets. Nat Clim Change 3:424–427. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1778 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bamber JL, Aspinall WL, Cooke RM (2016) A commentary on “how to interpret expert judgment assessments of 21st century sea-level rise. Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
  3. De Vries H, Van de Wal RSW (2015) How to interpret expert judgement assessments of 21st century sea level rise. Clim Change:1–14. doi:10.1007/s10584-015-1346-x
  4. Horton BJ, Rahmstorf S, Engelhart SE, Kemp AC (2014) Expert assessment of sea-level rise by AD 2100 and AD 2300. Quat Sci Rev 84:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Oppenheimer M, Little CM, Cooke RM (2016) Expert judgement and uncertainty quantification for climate change. Nat Clim Change 6(5):445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI)De BiltThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research UtrechtUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations