Climatic Change

, Volume 135, Issue 1, pp 97–109 | Cite as

Climate change impacts on ecosystems and ecosystem services in the United States: process and prospects for sustained assessment

  • Nancy B. Grimm
  • Peter Groffman
  • Michelle Staudinger
  • Heather Tallis


The third United States National Climate Assessment emphasized an evaluation of not just the impacts of climate change on species and ecosystems, but also the impacts of climate change on the benefits that people derive from nature, known as ecosystem services. The ecosystems, biodiversity, and ecosystem services component of the assessment largely drew upon the findings of a transdisciplinary workshop aimed at developing technical input for the assessment, involving participants from diverse sectors. A small author team distilled and synthesized this and hundreds of other technical input to develop the key findings of the assessment. The process of developing and ranking key findings hinged on identifying impacts that had particular, demonstrable effects on the U.S. public via changes in national ecosystem services. Findings showed that ecosystem services are threatened by the impacts of climate change on water supplies, species distributions and phenology, as well as multiple assaults on ecosystem integrity that, when compounded by climate change, reduce the capacity of ecosystems to buffer against extreme events. As ecosystems change, such benefits as water sustainability and protection from storms that are afforded by intact ecosystems are projected to decline across the continent due to climate change. An ongoing, sustained assessment that focuses on the co-production of actionable climate science will allow scientists from a range of disciplines to ascertain the capability of their forecasting models to project environmental and ecological change and link it to ecosystem services; additionally, an iterative process of evaluation, development of management strategies, monitoring, and reevaluation will increase the applicability and usability of the science by the U.S. public.


Ecosystem Service Sustained Assessment Future Assessment Technical Input Author Team 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors acknowledge the contributions of many scientists and other stakeholders to the production of the TI BEES and the Ecosystems Chapter. We are especially grateful to TI BEES steering committee members Peter Kareiva and Shawn Carter and author team members Carter, Kareiva, Josh Lawler, Michelle Mack, and Virginia Matzek. NCA staff member Susan Aragon-Long was tireless in her efforts during the review and revision process. We acknowledge the work of reviewers, whose comments helped to improve this paper.

Supplementary material

10584_2015_1547_MOESM1_ESM.docx (27 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 27 kb)


  1. Backlund P, Janetos A, Schimel DS, Hatfield J, Ryan MG, Archer SR, Lettenmaier D (2008) Executive summary. The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States. A Report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Washington, DC., USA, In, 362 ppGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennett, T. M. B., N. G. Maynard, P. Cochran, R. Gough, K. Lynn, J. Maldonado, G. Voggesser, S. Wotkyns, and K. Cozzetto. 2014. Ch. 12: Indigenous Peoples, Lands, and Resources. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, J. M. Melillo, Terese (T.C.) Richmond, and G. W. Yohe, Eds., U.S. Global Change Research Program, 297–317. doi:  10.7930/J09G5R1
  3. Bentz BJ, Regniere J, Fettig CJ, et al. (2010) Climate change and bark beetles of the western United States and Canada: direct and indirect effects. Bioscience 60:602–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cutter, S. L., W. Solecki, N. Bragado, J. Carmin, M. Fragkias, M. Ruth, and T. J. Wilbanks. 2014. Ch. 11: Urban systems, infrastructure, and vulnerability. Pages 282–296 in Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. J. M. Melillo, Terese (T.C.) Richmond, and G. W. Yohe, Eds., U.S. Global Change Research Program. doi:  10.7930/J0F769GR
  5. Daily, GC (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. D'Amato AW, Bradford JB, Fraver S, Palik Brian J. BJ (2013) Effects of thinning on drought vulnerability and climate response in north temperate forest ecosystems. Ecol Appl 23:1735–1742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Groffman, P. M., P. Kareiva, S. Carter, N. B. Grimm, J. Lawler, M. Mack, V. Matzek, and H. Tallis. 2014. Ch. 8: Ecosystems, Biodiversity, and Ecosystem Services. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, J. M. Melillo, Terese (T.C.) Richmond, and G. W. Yohe, Eds., U.S. Global Change Research Program, 195–219, doi:  10.7930/J0TD9V7H.
  8. Grimm NB, Chapin FS, Bierwagen B, Gonzalez P, Groffman PM, Luo Y, Melton F, Nadelhoffer K, Pairis A, Raymond PA, Schimel J, Williamson CE (2013a) The impacts of climate change on ecosystem structure and function. Front Ecol Environ 11:474–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grimm NB, Jacobs KL (2013) Evaluating climate impacts on people and ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 11:455. doi:  10.1890/1540-9295-11.9.455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Grimm NB, Staudinger MD, Staudt A, Carter SL, Chapin FS, Kareiva P, Ruckelshaus M, Stein BA (2013b) Climate-change impacts on ecological systems: introduction to a US assessment. Front Ecol Environ 11:456–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foderaro, L. W. November 20, 2012. "After Saving Fire Island, Line of Defense Is Lost to the Sea". The New York Times. p. A18. Retrieved 10/2/2014.Google Scholar
  12. Joyce, L. A., S. W. Running, D. D. Breshears, V. H. Dale, R. W. Malmsheimer, R. N. Sampson, B. Sohngen, and C. W. Woodall. 2014. Ch. 7: Forests. Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment, J. M. Melillo, Terese (T.C.) Richmond, and G. W. Yohe, Eds., U.S. Global Change Research Program, 175–194. doi:  10.7930/J0Z60KZC
  13. Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (2009) Global climate change impacts in the United States. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Kunkel, K. E., D. R. Easterling, D. A. R. Kristovich, B. Gleason, L. Stoecker, and R. Smith. 2010. Recent increases in U.S. heavy precipitation associated with tropical cyclones. Geophysical Research Letters: 37. doi:  10.1029/2010gl045164
  15. Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH (2012) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27:19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MEA, M. E. A (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  17. Meadow AM, Ferguson DB, Guido Z, Horangic A, Owen G, Wall T (2015) Moving toward the deliberate coproduction of climate science knowledge. Weather, Climate, and Society 7:179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Melillo JM, Richmond T(TC), Yohe GW (eds) (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, 841 pp. doi:  10.7930/J0Z31WJ2
  19. National Assessment Synthesis Team (2000) Climate change impacts on the United States: The potential consequences of climate variability and change. US Global Change Research Program, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Nelson EJ, Kareiva P, Ruckelshaus M, Arkema K, Geller G, Girvetz E, Goodrich D, Matzek V, Pinsky M, Reid W, Saunders M, Semmens D, Tallis H (2013) Climate change’s impact on key ecosystem services and the human well-being they support in the US. Front Ecol Environ 11:483–893. doi:  10.1890/120312 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Paradis A, Elkinton J, Hayhoe K, Buonaccorsi J (2008) Role of winter temperature and climate change on the survival and future range expansion of the hemlock woolly adelgid (adelges tsugae) in eastern North America. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 13:541–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Perrings C, Duraiappah A, Larigauderie A, Mooney H (2011) The biodiversity and ecosystem services science-policy interface. Science 331:1139–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinsky ML, Fogarty M (2012) Lagged socio-ecological responses to climate and range shifts in fisheries. Clim Chang 115:883–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. The Royal Society. 2014. Resilience to Extreme wEather The Royal Society Policy Report, DES3400, ISBN: 978–1-78252-113-6Google Scholar
  25. Staudinger, M.D., Grimm, N., Staudt, A., Carter, S., Chapin, F.S.III, Kareiva, P., Ruckelshaus, M., and B. Stein. 2012. Impacts of Climate Change on Biodiversity, Ecosystems, and Ecosystem Services: Technical Input to the 2013 National Climate Assessment. Cooperative Report to the 2013 National Climate Assessment. 296 p. Available at:
  26. Staudinger MD, Carter S, Cross M, Dubois N, Duffy E, Enquist C, Griffis R, Hellmann J, Lawler J, Morrison S, O’Leary J, Stein B, Turner W (2013) Biodiversity in a changing climate: a synthesis of current and projected trends in the United States. Front Ecol Environ 11:465–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Staudt A, Leidner AK, Howard J, Aa Brauma K, Dukes JS, Hansen LJ, Paukert C, Sabo J, Solórzano LSA (2013) The added complications of climate change: understanding and managing biodiversity and ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 11:494–501. doi:  10.1890/120275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stein BA, Staudt A, Cross MS, Dubois NS, Enquist C, Griffis R, Hansen LJ, Hellmann JJ, Lawler JJ, Nelson EJ, Pairis A (2013) Preparing for and managing change: climate adaptation for biodiversity and ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 11:502–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. UK National Ecosystem Assessment (2011) The UK national ecosystem assessment: synthesis of the Key findings. UNEP-WCMC, LWEC, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Mantgem PJ, Stephenson NL, Byrne JC, Daniels LD, Franklin JF, Fule PZ, Harmon ME, Larson AJ, Smith JM, Taylor AH, Veblen TT (2009) Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States. Science 323:521–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams CA, Collatz GJ, Masek J, Goward SN (2012) Carbon consequences of forest disturbance and recovery across the conterminous United States. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 26:GB1005. doi:  10.1029/2010GB003947 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht (outside the USA) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy B. Grimm
    • 1
  • Peter Groffman
    • 2
  • Michelle Staudinger
    • 3
  • Heather Tallis
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Life SciencesArizona State UniversityTempeUSA
  2. 2.Cary Institute of Ecosystem StudiesMillbrookUSA
  3. 3.Northeast Climate Science CenterAmherstUSA
  4. 4.The Nature ConservancySanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations