Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 135, Issue 1, pp 187–201 | Cite as

Aspirations and common tensions: larger lessons from the third US national climate assessment

  • Susanne C. MoserEmail author
  • Jerry M. Melillo
  • Katharine L. Jacobs
  • Richard H. Moss
  • James L. Buizer
Article

Abstract

The Third US National Climate Assessment (NCA3) was produced by experts in response to the US Global Change Research Act of 1990. Based on lessons learned from previous domestic and international assessments, the NCA3 was designed to speak to a broad public and inform the concerns of policy- and decision-makers at different scales. The NCA3 was also intended to be the first step in an ongoing assessment process that would build the nation’s capacity to respond to climate change. This concluding paper draws larger lessons from the insights gained throughout the assessment process that are of significance to future US and international assessment designers. We bring attention to process and products delivered, communication and engagement efforts, and how they contributed to the sustained assessment. Based on areas where expectations were exceeded or not fully met, we address four common tensions that all assessment designers must confront and manage: between (1) core assessment ingredients (knowledge base, institutional set-up, principled process, and the people involved), (2) national scope and subnational adaptive management information needs, (3) scope, complexity, and manageability, and (4) deliberate evaluation and ongoing learning approaches. Managing these tensions, amidst the social and political contexts in which assessments are conducted, is critical to ensure that assessments are feasible and productive, while its outcomes are perceived as credible, salient, and legitimate.

Keywords

Assessment Process Sustained Assessment Global Change Research Assessment Designer Climate Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Buizer JL, Fleming P, Hays SL, Dow K, Field CB, Gustafson D, Luers A, Moss RH (2013) Report on preparing the nation for change: building a sustained national climate assessment process, national climate assessment and development advisory committee, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Buizer JL, Dow K, Black ME, Jacobs KL, Waple A, et al. (2015) Building a sustained climate assessment process. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1501-4
  3. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clark WC, Mitchell RB, Cash DW (2006) Evaluating the influence of global environmental assessments. In: Mitchell RB, Clark WC, Cash DW, Dickson N (eds) Global environmental assessments: information and influence. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  5. Cloyd ET, Moser SC, Maibach EW, Maldonado JK, Chen T (submitted for this issue) Engagement in the third US national climate assessment: commitment, capacity, and communication for impact. Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
  6. Executive Office of the President (2013) President’s climate action plan. June 2013Google Scholar
  7. Galford GL, Betts AK, Carlson S, Ford S, Hoogenboom A, et al. (submitted for this issue) Opportunities and strategies for statelevel climate assessments. Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
  8. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) (2014) Frameworks for evaluating the national climate assessment: workshop report. USGCRP, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Grimm N, Groffman PM, Staudinger MD, Tallis H (submitted for this issue) Climate change impacts on ecosystems and ecosystem services in the United States: Process and prospects for sustained assessment. Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
  10. Howden M, Jacobs KL (submitted for this issue) Innovations in assessment and adaptation: building on the US national climate assessment. Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs KL, Buizer JL (2015) Building community, credibility and knowledge: the third US National Climate Assessment. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1445-8
  12. Kenney MA, Janetos AC, Lough G (submitted for this issue) Building an integrated national climate indicator system, Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
  13. Liverman D (2015) U.S. national climate assessment gaps and research needs: overview, the economy and the international context. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1464-5
  14. Maldonado JK, Bull Bennett TM, Chief K, Cochran P, Cozzetto K, et al. (submitted for this issue) Engagement with indigenous peoples and honoring traditional ecological knowledge, Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
  15. Miles EL, Snover AK, Whitely Binder LC, Sarachik ES, Mote PW, Mantua N (2006) An approach to designing a national climate service. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19616–19623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morgan MG, Cantor R, Clark WC, Fisher A, Jacoby HD, Janetos AC, Kinzig AP, Melillo J, Street RB, Wilbanks TJ (2005) Learning from the U.S. national assessment of climate change impacts. Environ Sci Technol 39(23):9023–9032CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Moser SC, Finzi Hart J (2015) The long arm of climate change: exploring climate change impacts via teleconnections. Clim Chang 129(1–2):13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moser SC, Davidson MA (2015) The third national climate assessment’s coastal chapter: the making of an integrated assessment. Climatic Change. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1512-1
  19. Moss RH (submitted for this issue) Assessing decision support systems and levels of confidence to narrow the climate Information "usability gap". Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
  20. National Research Council (NRC) (2007) Analysis of global change assessments: lessons learned. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  21. Waple AM, Champion SM, Kunkel KE, Tilmes C (submitted for this issue) Innovations in information management and access for assessments. Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne C. Moser
    • 1
    • 6
    Email author
  • Jerry M. Melillo
    • 2
  • Katharine L. Jacobs
    • 3
    • 7
  • Richard H. Moss
    • 4
  • James L. Buizer
    • 5
    • 8
  1. 1.Susanne Moser Research & ConsultingStanford UniversitySanta CruzUSA
  2. 2.Marine Biological LaboratoryWoods HoleUSA
  3. 3.Center for Climate Adaptation Science and SolutionsUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  4. 4.Pacific Northwest National LaboratoryJoint Global Change Research InstituteCollege ParkUSA
  5. 5.Climate Adaptation and Development, Institute of the EnvironmentUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  6. 6.Woods Institute for the EnvironmentStanford UniversityPalo AltoUSA
  7. 7.Department of Soil, Water and Environmental ScienceUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  8. 8.School of Natural Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations