Climatic Change

, Volume 134, Issue 1–2, pp 311–326 | Cite as

Using historical climate observations to understand future climate change crop yield impacts in the Southeastern US

  • Davide Cammarano
  • David Zierden
  • Lydia Stefanova
  • Senthold Asseng
  • James J. O’Brien
  • James W. Jones
Article

Abstract

Historical weather data (1900–2000) of the Southeast U.S.A. was divided into baseline (neutral, 1981–2000), warm (1935–1954) and cold (1958–1977) periods and used in impact simulation experiments to understand climate effects on a summer and a winter crop. Simulated summer crop (maize) yields were lower in the warm than the cold period, but also low during a neutral period. Simulated winter crop (wheat) yields were higher during the neutral period than during the warm and cold periods. A higher average temperature of a given period did not necessarily translate to lower crop yields. Specifically, the summer crop (maize) experienced about 7 % reduction in growing season length per degree increase in mean air temperature, and about 5 % for the winter (wheat) crop. Overall, the simulated maize yield was reduced by 13 % and wheat yield by 6.5 % per unit of increase temperature. In conclusion, simulated yield reduction per unit increase in mean temperature was reduced during the neutral period for the summer while for the winter crop there were fewer differences between the warm and neutral periods. The summer crop was sensitive to changes of mean growing season temperatures while the winter crops was sensitive to changes in CO2.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the South East Climate Consortium (SECC) and NOAA’s Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) program for support.

We also thank the anonymous referees for the valuable comments and suggestions that helped improve the manuscript.

References

  1. Asseng S (2004) Wheat crop systems: a simulation analysis. CSIRO Publishing, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  2. Asseng S, Foster I, Turner NC (2011) The impact of temperature variability on wheat yields. Global Chang Biol 17:997–1012. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02262.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asseng S et al (2013) Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3:827–832. doi:10.1038/Nclimate1916 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bassu S et al (2014) How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors? Glob Chang Biol 20:2301–2320. doi:10.1111/gcb.12520 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burke MB, Lobell DB, Guarino L (2009) Shifts in African crop climates by 2050, and the implications for crop improvement and genetic resources conservation. Global Environ Chang 19:317–325. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cammarano D et al (2013) Evaluating the fidelity of downscaled climate data on simulated wheat and maize production in the southeastern US. Reg Environ Chang 13:S101–S110. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0410-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carbone GJ, Kiechle W, Locke C, Mearns LO, McDaniel L, Downton MW (2003) Response of soybean and sorghum to varying spatial scales of climate change scenarios in the southeastern United States. Clim Chang 60:73–98. doi:10.1023/A:1026041330889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DeGaetano AT, Allen RJ (2002) Trends in twentieth-century temperature extremes across the United States. J Clim 15:3188–3205. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2002)015<3188:Titcte>2.0.Co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dettinger MD, Ghil M, Keppenne CL (1995) Interannual and interdecadal variability in United-States surface-air temperatures, 1910–87. Clim Chang 31:35–66. doi:10.1007/Bf01092980 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diaz HF, Quayle RG (1980) The climate of the United-States since 1895 spatial and temporal changes. Mon Weather Rev 108:249–266. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108<0249:Tcotus>2.0.Co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fowler HJ, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Int J Climatol 27:1547–1578. doi:10.1002/Joc.1556 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraisse CW, Sudduth KA, Kitchen NR (2004) Calibration of the CERES-Maize model for simulating site-specific crop development and yield on claypan soils. Appl Eng Agric 17:10Google Scholar
  13. Godfray HCJ et al (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818. doi:10.1126/science.1185383 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hansen JW, Jones JW (2000) Scaling-up crop models for climate variability applications. Agric Syst 65:43–72. doi:10.1016/S0308-521x(00)00025-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1982) Estimating potential evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 108:6Google Scholar
  16. Hatfield JL et al (2011) Climate impacts on agriculture: implications for crop production. Agron J 103:351–370. doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoogenboom G et al (2012) Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT). Version 4.5 [CD-Rom]Google Scholar
  18. Ingram K, Dow K, Carter L, Anderson J (2013) Climate of the Southeast United States: variability, change, impacts, and vulnerability. Island Press, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Contribution of working group I. In: Houghton J (ed) Third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 881Google Scholar
  20. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group i to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones JW et al (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00107-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kunkel KE, Liang XZ, Zhu JH, Lin YR (2006) Can CGCMs simulate the twentieth-century “warming hole” in the central United States? J Clim 19:4137–4153. doi:10.1175/Jcli3848.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lobell D, Field C (2007) Global scale climate - crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett 2 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/2/1/014002
  24. Lopez-Cedron FX, Boote KJ, Ruiz-Nogueira B, Sau F (2005) Testing CERES-Maize versions to estimate maize production in a cool environment. Eur J Agron 23:89–102. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2005.01.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mearns LO, Easterling W, Hays C, Marx D (2001) Comparison of agricultural impacts of climate change calculated from high and low resolution climate change scenarios: Part I. The uncertainty due to spatial scale. Clim Chang 51:131–172. doi:10.1023/A:1012297314857 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Moriondo M, Giannakopoulos C, Bindi M (2011) Climate change impact assessment: the role of climate extremes in crop yield simulation. Clim Chang 104:679–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ottman MJ, Kimball BA, White JW, Wall GW (2012) Wheat growth response to increased temperature from varied planting dates and supplemental infrared heating. Agron J 104:7–16. doi:10.2134/agronj2011.0212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Porter JR, Gawith M (1999) Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat: a review. Eur J Agron 10:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Williams MD (2010) Characterizing multi-decadal temperature variability in the Southeastern United States. The Florida State UniversityGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Cammarano
    • 1
    • 2
  • David Zierden
    • 3
    • 4
  • Lydia Stefanova
    • 3
  • Senthold Asseng
    • 1
  • James J. O’Brien
    • 3
    • 5
  • James W. Jones
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.Agricultural and Biological EngineeringUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.James Hutton InstituteDundeeUK
  3. 3.Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies (COAPS)Florida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  4. 4.Florida Climate CenterFlorida State UniversityTallahasseeUSA
  5. 5.Florida Climate InstituteUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations