Climatic Change

, Volume 132, Issue 4, pp 721–722 | Cite as

Erratum to: The carbon balance of reducing wildfire risk and restoring process: an analysis of 10-year post-treatment carbon dynamics in a mixed-conifer forest

  • Morgan L. Wiechmann
  • Matthew D. Hurteau
  • Malcolm P. North
  • George W. Koch
  • Lucie Jerabkova
Erratum

Erratum to: Clim Chang

DOI 10.1007/s10584-015-1450-y

Table 1 is displayed incorrectly in the original publication. The correct version is given here.
Table 1

The mean carbon stock size (Mg C ha−1) of different pools immediately post-treatment (2002) and 10-years post-treatment (2011) for each of six treatments and the net ecosystem productivity (NEP) over the 10-year post-treatment period

 

Control

Burn only

Understory-thin

 

2002

2011

2002

2011

2002

2011

Live tree

302.4 ± 40.7

286.5 ± 34.4ab

240.1 ± 10.2

259.1 ± 14.5ab

209.0 ± 26.8

256.3 ± 13.0b

Snag

20.8 ± 3.6

45.6 ± 10.1a

25.2 ± 5.6

45.2 ± 1.2a

34.1 ± 7.3

54.6 ± 11.9a

CWD

27.6 ± 4.8

15.4 ± 1.9a

9.4 ± 0.8

12.1 ± 4.4a

20.3 ± 2.9a

20.3 ± 4.4a

FWD

4.17 ± 0.4

12.7 ± 1.4ab

4.16 ± 0.5

10.2 ± 0.8ab

7.73 ± 1.0

16.6 ± 0.6b

Litter and duff

7.90 ± 0.2

5.19 ± 0.8a

4.70 ± 0.1

4.89 ± 0.9a

7.40 ± 0.2

5.99 ± 0.7a

Soil (30 cm)

78.1 ± 2.9

75.2 ± 10.3a

67.6 ± 3.9

67.3 ± 4.7a

103.0 ± 13.6

79.3 ± 1.3a

Shrub

0.03 ± 0.01

0.02 ± 0.00ab

0.03 ± 0.01

0.02 ± 0.01a

0.01 ± 0.00

0.02 ± 0.01ab

Total

440.9 ± 46.1

440.7 ± 50.1a

351.3 ± 18.9

398.9 ± 15.6a

381.6 ± 50.2

433.1 ± 23.3a

NEP (10-year)

 

−0.2 ± 20.2

 

47.6 ± 9.8

 

51.5 ± 27.4

NBP (10-year)

 

−0.2 ± 20.2

 

32.8 ± 3.5

 

31.4 ± 4.2

 

Understory-thin and burn

Overstory-thin

Overstory-thin and burn

 

2002

2011

2002

2011

2002

2011

Live tree

173.3 ± 9.3

169.5 ± 3.8a

107.7 ± 9.7

128.8 ± 7.5ab

77.6 ± 11.5

78.4 ± 19.1a

Snag

26.4 ± 1.1

48.1 ± 8.4a

25.6 ± 4.8

44.6 ± 17.8a

16.7 ± 0.7

27.9 ± 2.5a

CWD

8.9 ± 1.8

26.6 ± 6.4a

17.6 ± 1.9

22.5 ± 4.9a

8.4 ± 3.3

17.1 ± 3.6a

FWD

5.09 ± 1.2

7.03 ± 2.8a

8.36 ± 0.3

10.9 ± 1.7ab

4.32 ± 0.4

8.19 ± 0.9ab

Litter and duff

4.40 ± 0.2

4.83 ± 1.5a

9.60 ± 0.3

4.08 ± 0.5a

1.60 ± 0.11

2.91 ± 0.5a

Soil (30 cm)

82.0 ± 5.3

84.8 ± 5.8a

85.2 ± 5.7

74.5 ± 4.7a

81.4 ± 3.7

66.7 ± 1.4a

Shrub

0.02 ± 0.01

0.04 ± 0.00ab

0.01 ± 0.00

0.03 ± 0.00a

0.01 ± 0.00

0.06 ± 0.01b

Total

300.2 ± 14.0

340.9 ± 6.6a

254.1 ± 21.4

285.5 ± 32.8a

190.0 ± 18.3

201.3 ± 18.7a

NEP (10-year)

 

40.7 ± 20.2

 

31.4 ± 12.1

 

11.2 ± 0.9

NBP (10-year)

 

−6.0 ± 4.5

 

−9.7 ± 0.7

 

−56.6 ± 2.2

Net biome productivity (NBP) over the 10-year post-treatment period was calculated as NEP minus all treatment related emissions. Standard errors are shown following the plus-minus sign. Values in the same row with different letters indicate a significant difference in carbon pools 10 years post-treatment (p ≤ 0.05)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Morgan L. Wiechmann
    • 1
  • Matthew D. Hurteau
    • 2
  • Malcolm P. North
    • 3
  • George W. Koch
    • 4
  • Lucie Jerabkova
    • 5
    • 6
  1. 1.IGDP in Ecology and Department of Ecosystem Science and ManagementThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ecosystem Science and ManagementThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA
  3. 3.USDA Forest ServicePacific Southwest Research StationDavisUSA
  4. 4.Center for Ecosystem Science and Society and Department of Biological ScienceNorthern Arizona UniversityFlagstaffUSA
  5. 5.Department of Plant ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  6. 6.Department of Forest ManagementCzech University of Life Sciences PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations