Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 132, Issue 4, pp 601–613 | Cite as

Projected climate change impacts on vegetation distribution over Kashmir Himalayas

  • Irfan RashidEmail author
  • Shakil Ahmad Romshoo
  • Rajiv Kumar Chaturvedi
  • N. H. Ravindranath
  • Raman Sukumar
  • Mathangi Jayaraman
  • Thatiparthi Vijaya Lakshmi
  • Jagmohan Sharma
Article

Abstract

Despite high vulnerability, the impact of climate change on Himalayan ecosystem has not been properly investigated, primarily due to the inadequacy of observed data and the complex topography. In this study, we mapped the current vegetation distribution in Kashmir Himalayas from NOAA AVHRR and projected it under A1B SRES, RCP-4.5 and RCP-8.5 climate scenarios using the vegetation dynamics model-IBIS at a spatial resolution of 0.5°. The distribution of vegetation under the changing climate was simulated for the 21st century. Climate change projections from the PRECIS experiment using the HADRM3 model, for the Kashmir region, were validated using the observed climate data from two observatories. Both the observed as well as the projected climate data showed statistically significant trends. IBIS was validated for Kashmir Himalayas by comparing the simulated vegetation distribution with the observed distribution. The baseline simulated scenario of vegetation (1960–1990), showed 87.15 % agreement with the observed vegetation distribution, thereby increasing the credibility of the projected vegetation distribution under the changing climate over the region. According to the model projections, grasslands and tropical deciduous forests in the region would be severely affected while as savannah, shrubland, temperate evergreen broadleaf forest, boreal evergreen forest and mixed forest types would colonize the area currently under the cold desert/rock/ice land cover types. The model predicted that a substantial area of land, presently under the permanent snow and ice cover, would disappear by the end of the century which might severely impact stream flows, agriculture productivity and biodiversity in the region.

Keywords

Indian Meteorological Department Alien Invasive Species Vegetation Distribution Evergreen Broadleaf Forest NOAA AVHRR 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors express gratitude to Dr. Christine Delire and another anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments and suggestions on the earlier versions of the manuscript that greatly improved the content and structure of this manuscript.

Supplementary material

10584_2015_1456_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.3 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 1340 kb)

References

  1. Achard F, Eva H, Mayaux P (2001) Tropical forest mapping from coarse spatial resolution satellite data: production and accuracy assessment issues. Int J Remote Sens 22(14):2741–2762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akhtar M, Ahmad N, Booij MJ (2008) The impact of climate change on the water resources of Hindukush–Karakorum–Himalaya region under different glacier coverage scenarios. J Hydrol 355(1):148–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aryal A, Brunton D, Raubenheimer D (2014) Impact of climate change on human-wildlife-ecosystem interactions in the Trans-Himalaya region of Nepal. Theor Appl Climatol 115:517–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachelet D, Neilson RP, Lenihan JM, Drapek RJ (2000) Climate change effects on vegetation distribution and carbon budget in the United States. Ecosystems 4:164–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beniston M (2003) Climatic change in mountain regions: a review of possible impacts. In Climate variability and change in high elevation regions: past, present and future. Springer, Netherlands pp 5–31Google Scholar
  6. Bhutiyani MR, Kale VS, Pawar NJ (2007) Long-term trends in maximum, minimum and mean annual air temperatures across the Northwestern Himalaya during the twentieth century. Clim Chang 85:159–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolch T, Kulkarni A, Kääb A et al (2012) The state and fate of Himalayan glaciers. Science 336(6079):310–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Buyantuyev A, Wu J (2007) Effects of thematic resolution on landscape pattern analysis. Landsc Ecol 22(1):7–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Champion SH, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of the forest types of India. Natraj Publishers, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaturvedi RK, Gopalakrishnan R, Jayaraman M et al (2011) Impact of climate change on Indian forests: a dynamic vegetation modeling approach. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(2):119–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chaturvedi RK, Joshi J, Jayaraman M et al (2012) Multi-model climate change projections for India under representative concentration pathways. Curr Sci 103(7):791–802Google Scholar
  12. Cramer W, Bondeau A, Woodward FI et al (2001) Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models. Glob Chang Biol 7(4):357–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dar GH, Bhagat RC, Khan MA (2002) Biodiversity of the Kashmir Himalaya. Valley Book House, SrinagarGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to quaternary climate change. Science 292:673–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dimri AP (2014) How robust and (un)certain are regional climate models over Himalayas? Cryosphere Discuss 8(6):6251–6270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engler R, Randinw CF, Thuiller W et al (2011) 21st century climate change threatens mountain Flora unequally across Europe. Glob Chang Biol 17:2330–2341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ernakovich JG, Hopping KA, Berdanier AB et al (2014) Predicted responses of arctic and alpine ecosystems to altered seasonality under climate change. Glob Chang Biol. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12568 Google Scholar
  18. Foley JA, Prentice IC, Ramankutty N et al (1996) An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance, and vegetation dynamics. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 10(4):603–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Foley JA, Levis S, Costa MH et al (2000) Incorporating dynamic vegetation cover within global climate models. Ecol Appl 10(6):1620–1632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gottfried M, Pauli H, Futschik A et al (2012) Continent-wide response of mountain vegetation to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 2(2):111–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes L (2000) Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends Ecol Evol 15:56–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huntley B (1991) How plants respond to climate change: migration rates. Individualism and the consequences for plant communities. Ann Bot 67:15–22Google Scholar
  23. Immerzeel WW, Van-Beek LP, Bierkens MF (2010) Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science 328(5984):1382–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Immerzeel WW, Van-Beek LPH, Konz M et al (2012) Hydrological response to climate change in a glacierized catchment in the Himalayas. Clim Chang 110(3–4):721–736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IPCC (2013) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, p 1535Google Scholar
  26. ISRO (2010) Biodiversity characterisation at landscape level in Jammu and Kashmir using satellite remote sensing and geographic information system. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones RG, Nouger M, Hassel DC et al (2004) Generating high resolution climate change scenarios using PRECIS, report 40pp. Met Off Hadley Centre, ExeterGoogle Scholar
  28. Joshi PK, Rawat A, Narula S, Sinha V (2012) Assessing impact of climate change on forest cover type shifts in Western Himalayan Ecoregion. J For Res 23(1):75–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Khuroo AA, Rashid I, Reshi Z et al (2007) The alien flora of Kashmir Himalaya. Biol Invasions 9(3):269–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kucharik CJ, Foley JA, Delire C et al (2000) Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: water balance, carbon balance and vegetation structure. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 14(3):795–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kulkarni A, Patwardhan S, Kumar KK et al (2013) Projected climate change in the Hindu Kush-Himalayan region by using the high-resolution regional climate model PRECIS. Mt Res Dev 33(2):142–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lenihan JM, Drapek R, Bachelet D, Neilson RP (2003) Climate change effects on vegetation distribution, carbon, and fire in California. Ecol Appl 13(6):1667–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Masoodi A, Sengupta A, Khan FA, Sharma GP (2013) Predicting the spread of alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) in Wular lake, India: a mathematical approach. Ecol Model 263:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McClean CJ, Lovett JC, Küper W et al. (2005) African plant diversity and climate change. Ann Mo Bot Gard 139–152Google Scholar
  35. McMahon SM, Harrison SP, Armbruster WS et al (2011) Improving assessment and modelling of climate change impacts on global terrestrial biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evol 26(5):249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morley RJ (2011) Cretaceous and tertiary climate change and the past distribution of megathermal rainforests. In Tropical rainforest responses to climatic change. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–34Google Scholar
  37. Muhlfeld CC, Giersch JJ, Hauer FR et al (2011) Climate change links fate of glaciers and an endemic alpine invertebrate. Clim Chang 106(2):337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ni J (2001) Carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems of China: estimates at different spatial resolutions and their responses to climate change. Clim Chang 49(3):339–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12(5):361–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rashid I, Romshoo SA, Vijayalakshmi T (2013) Geospatial modelling approach for identifying disturbance regimes and biodiversity rich areas in North Western Himalayas, India. Biodivers Conserv 22(11):2537–2566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Romshoo SA, Rashid I (2014) Assessing the impacts of changing land cover and climate on Hokersar wetland in Indian Himalayas. Arab J Geosci 7(1):143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Romshoo SA, Dar RA, Rashid I et al (2015) Implications of shrinking cryosphere under changing climate on the streamflows of the upper Indus Basin. Arctic, Antarctic and Alpine Research. In PressGoogle Scholar
  44. Roy PS, Murthy MSR, Roy A et al (2013) Forest fragmentation in India. Curr Sci 105(6):774–780Google Scholar
  45. Seppälä R (2009) A global assessment on adaptation of forests to climate change. Scand J For Res 24(6):469–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shao G, Wu J (2008) On the accuracy of landscape pattern analysis using remote sensing data. Landsc Ecol 23(5):505–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharma KP, Vorosmarty CJ, Moore B III (2000) Sensitivity of the Himalayan hydrology to land-use and climatic changes. Clim Chang 47:117–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sorg A, Bolch T, Stoffel M et al (2012) Climate change impacts on glaciers and runoff in Tien Shan (Central Asia). Nat Clim Chang 2(10):725–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Suárez A, Watson RT, Dokken DJ (2002) Climate change and biodiversity. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  50. Sykes MT, Prentice IC, Smith B et al (2001) An introduction to the European terrestrial ecosystem modelling activity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 10:581–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Telwala Y, Brook BW, Manish K, Pandit MK (2013) Climate-induced elevational range shifts and increase in plant Species richness in a Himalayan biodiversity epicentre. PLoS ONE 8(2):e57103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walther GR, Post E, Convey P et al (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Winter JM, Pal JS, Eltahir EA (2009) Coupling of integrated biosphere simulator to regional climate model version 3. J Clim 22(10):2743–2757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Woodward FI, Beerling DJ (1997) The dynamics of vegetation change: health warnings for equilibrium ‘dodo’ models. Glob Ecol Biogeogr Lett 6:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Xiong W, Lin E, Ju H, Xu Y (2007) Climate change and critical thresholds in China’s food security. Clim Chang 81(2):205–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yu M, Wang G, Parr D, Ahmed KF (2014) Future changes of the terrestrial ecosystem based on a dynamic vegetation model driven with RCP8.5 climate projections from 19 GCMs. Clim Chang 127(2):257–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yuan QZ, Zhao DS, Wu SH, Dai EF (2011) Validation of the integrated biosphere simulator in simulating the potential natural vegetation map of China. Ecol Res 26(5):917–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yue S, Pilon P (2004) A comparison of the power of the t test, Mann-Kendall and bootstrap tests for trend detection/Une comparaison de la puissance des tests t de Student, de Mann-Kendall et du bootstrap pour la détection de tendance. Hydrol Sci J 49(1):21–37Google Scholar
  59. Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Metzger MJ et al. (2014) Projected climate change impacts on spatial distribution of bioclimatic zones and ecoregions within the Kailash Sacred Landscape of China, India, Nepal. Clim Chang 1–16 doi:  10.1007/s10584-014-1176-2

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Irfan Rashid
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Shakil Ahmad Romshoo
    • 1
  • Rajiv Kumar Chaturvedi
    • 3
  • N. H. Ravindranath
    • 3
    • 4
  • Raman Sukumar
    • 4
    • 5
  • Mathangi Jayaraman
    • 3
  • Thatiparthi Vijaya Lakshmi
    • 2
  • Jagmohan Sharma
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesUniversity of KashmirSrinagarIndia
  2. 2.Centre for EnvironmentJawaharlal Nehru Technological UniversityHyderabadIndia
  3. 3.Centre for Sustainable TechnologiesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  4. 4.Divecha Centre for Climate ChangeIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia
  5. 5.Centre for Ecological SciencesIndian Institute of ScienceBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations