Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 130, Issue 2, pp 185–199 | Cite as

Adapting transportation to climate change on federal lands in Washington State, U.S.A.

  • R. L. StrauchEmail author
  • C. L. Raymond
  • R. M. Rochefort
  • A. F. Hamlet
  • C. Lauver
Article

Abstract

Research scientists collaborated with federal land managers of two national parks and two national forests to conduct a climate change vulnerability assessment and to identify adaptation strategies for a transportation network covering 28,900 km of roads and trails in north-central Washington, U.S.A. The assessment employed observations of sensitivity and response to climatic variability, downscaled climate projections, literature reviews, current management policies and practices, expert knowledge, and stakeholder engagement. Primary pathways for climate impacts focused on projected increases in extreme high flows and flooding, elevated winter soil moisture and landslide hazards, and loss of snowpack. The biggest impacts to roads and trails are expected from temperature-induced changes in hydrologic regimes that enhance autumn flooding and reduce spring snowpack. Projected higher winter soil moisture caused by changes in seasonal precipitation and snow accumulation could reduce slope stability. Earlier snowmelt may lengthen the snow-free season for visitor use and agency operations. Infrastructure age, design, maintenance, location, use, and limited redundancy along with funding policies and management, influence the sensitivities of the transportation system. Vulnerabilities were identified based on when and where these sensitivities to changes in climate may emerge. Adaptation strategies and tactics identified to address these vulnerabilities included: upgrading stream crossing and drainage design, changing use and maintenance, relocating or closing roads and trails, modifying funding policies, and expanding pubic engagement. Many adaptation options are “no regrets” approaches to changes in climate projected for the 2040s and 2080s that can be applied to other resource sectors and mountainous regions.

Keywords

Debris Flow Vulnerability Assessment Landslide Hazard Flood Hazard Increase Soil Moisture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank USFS and NPS staff for organizing and participating in the workshop and providing subsequent expertise, input, and vision, especially Dave L. Peterson. Climate and hydrologic data produced by Climate Impacts Group (CIG): Guillaume Mauger, Ingrid Tohver, Jeremy Littell, and Se-Yeun Lee. Figures (except Fig. 4) by Robert Norheim and transportation data provided by Christopher DeLorto, National Park Service Transportation Scholar associated with the National Park Foundation and Eno Transportation Foundation. We are also grateful for the comments from three anonymous reviewers. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Northwest Climate Science Center; the National Park Service, North Cascades National Park Service Complex; the U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station; and National Science Foundation, CBET Environmental Sustainability Program (Grant #1336725).

Supplementary material

10584_2015_1357_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (270 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 269 kb)

References

  1. Albano CM, Angelo CL, Strauch RL, Thurman LL (2013) Potential effects of warming climate on visitor use in three Alaskan national parks. Park Sci 30(1):36–44Google Scholar
  2. Chapman L (2007) Transport and climate change: a review. J Transp Geogr 15:354–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crozier MJ (1986) Landslides: causes, consequences, and environment. Croom Helm, Ltd. Dover, NHGoogle Scholar
  4. Dominguez F, Rivera E, Lettenmaier DP, Castro CL (2012) Changes in winter precipitation extremes for the western United States under a warmer climate as simulated by regional climate models. Geophys Res Lett 39:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eisenack K, Stecker R (2012) A framework for analyzing climate change adaptation as actions. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17(3):243–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elsner MM, Cuo L, Voisin N et al (2010) Implications of 21st century climate change for the hydrology of Washington state. Clim Chang 102:225–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Halofsky JE, Peterson DL, O’Halloran KA, Hoffman CH (2011) Adapting to climate change at Olympic National Forest and Olympic National Park. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-844. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research StationGoogle Scholar
  8. Hambly D, Andrey J, Mills B, Fletcher C (2013) Projected implications of climate change for road safety in Greater Vancouver, Canada. Clim Chang 116:3–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hamlet AF, Elsner MM, Mauger GS, Lee S, Tohver I, Norheim RA (2013) An overview of the Columbia basin climate change scenarios project: approach, methods, and summary of key results. Atmosphere Ocean 51(4):392–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamlet AF (2010) Assessing water resources adaptive capacity to climate change impacts in the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 7(4):4437–4471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hamlet AF, Lettenmaier DP (2007) Effects of 20th century warming and climate variability on flood risk in the western US. Water Resour Res 43:W06427Google Scholar
  12. Hamlet AF, Mote PW, Clark MP, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Effects of temperature and precipitation variability on snowpack trends in the Western United States. J Clim 18:4545–4561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huggel C (2009) Recent extreme slope failures in glacier environments: effects of thermal perturbations. Quat Sci Rev 28:1119–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climate sensitivity and feedbacks. In: Pachauri RK, Reisinger A (eds) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  15. Kloprogge P, Van der Sluijs J (2006) The inclusion of stakeholder knowledge and perspective in integrated assessment of climate change. Clim Chang 75:359–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Irvin RA, Stansbury J (2004) Citizen participation in decision making: Is it worth the effort? Public Adm Rev 64(1):55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liang X, Lettenmaier DP, Wood EF, Burges SJ (1994) A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for GSMs. J Geophys Res 99:14415–14428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Louter D (2006) Windshield wilderness: cars, roads, and nature in Washington’s national parks. University of Washington Press, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  19. Littell JS, Peterson DL, Millar CI, O’Halloran KA (2012) U.S. national forests adapt to climate change through science-management partnerships. Clim Chang 110:269–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Littell JS, Elsner MM, Mauger GS, et al (2011) Regional climate and hydrologic change in the Northern US Rockies and Pacific Northwest: internally consistent projections of future climate for resource management. Project report available at: http://cses.washington.edu/picea/USFS/pub/Littell_etal_2010/Littell_etal._2011_Regional_Climatic_And_Hydrologic_Change_USFS_USFWS_JVA_17Apr11.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan. 2014
  21. MacArthur J, Mote P, Ideker J et al. (2012) Climate change impact assessment for surface transportation in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska. Research Report WA-RD 772. Olympia, WA: State of Washington, Department of Transportation, Office of Research and Library Services. OTREC-RR-12-01. Salem, OR: Oregon Transportation Research and Education ConsortiumGoogle Scholar
  22. Mantua N, Tohver I, Hamlet AF (2010) Climate change impacts on streamflow extremes and summertime stream temperature and their possible consequences for freshwater salmon habitat in Washington State. Clim Chang 201:187–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin YE (2006) Wildfire disturbance and shallow landsliding in coastal British Columbia over millennial time scales: a numerical modeling study. Catena 69Google Scholar
  24. Mauger G (2011) Meteorological dataset. Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington. Unpublished data. Available at: http://cses.washington.edu/picea/mauger/VIC_SNOW/pub/. Accessed 31 Jan. 2014
  25. Maurer M, Roalkvam, CL, and Salsibury, SL (2011) Climate Impacts Vulnerability Assessment. Washington State Department of Transportation Report, Olympia, 70 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Meyer MD (2008) Design Standards for US Transportation Infrastructure: The Implications of Climate Change. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. 30 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Michalak J, Withey JC, Lawler JL (2013) Climate adaptation planning for British Columbia provincial parks: A guide to conducting a rapid assessment of climate impacts on park management objectives. Prepared for North Pacific Landscape Conservation Cooperative. University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  28. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17:2145–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mills BN, Tighe SL, Andrey J, Smith JT, Huen K (2009) Climate change implications for flexible pavement design and performance in southern Canada. J Transp Eng 135(10):773–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mote PW, Salathé EP (2010) Future climate in the Pacific Northwest. Clim Chang 102:29–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mote P, Hamlet AF, Salathé EP (2008) Has spring snowpack declined in the Washington Cascades? Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 12:193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nakićenović N, Swart R (eds) (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios: a special report of working group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Neary DG, Ryan KC, DeBano LF (eds) (2005) Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on soils and water. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol.4., Rev. 2008,U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Ogden, UTGoogle Scholar
  34. National Research Council (NRC) (2008) Potential impacts of climate change on U.S. transportation: Special report 290. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, The National Academies Press, 280 ppGoogle Scholar
  35. Pelto MS, Riedel J (2001) Spatial and temporal variations in annual balance of North Cascade glaciers, Washington 1984–2000. Hydrol Process 15:3461–3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peterson DL, Millar CI, Joyce LA, et al (2011) Responding to climate change in national forests: a guidebook for developing adaptation options. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-855. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research StationGoogle Scholar
  37. Raymond CL, Peterson DL, Rochefort RM (2014) Climate Change Vulnerability and Adaptation in the North Cascades Region, Washington. Gen Tech RepPNW-GTR-892. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research StationGoogle Scholar
  38. Raymond CL, Peterson DL, Rochefort RM (2013) The north Cascadia adaptation partnership: a science management collaboration for responding to climate change. Sustainability 5(1):136–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogers BM, Neilson RP, Drapek R, Lenihan JM, Wells JR, Bachelet D, Law BE (2011) Impacts of climate change on fire regimes and carbon stocks of the U.S. Pacific Northwest. J Geophys Res 116:G03037Google Scholar
  40. Salathé EP, Hamlet AF, Mass CF, Lee S-Y, Stumbaugh M, Steed R (2014) Estimates of 21st Century flood risks in the Pacific Northwest based on regional climate model simulations. J Hydrometerol. doi: 10.1175/JHM-D-13-0137.1 Google Scholar
  41. Schmidt K, Roering JJ, Stock JD et al (2001) The variability of root cohesion as an influence on shallow landslide susceptibility in the Oregon Coast Range. Can Geotech J 38:995–1024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwartz HG, Meyer M, Burbank CJ, Kuby M, Oster C, Posey J, Russo EJ, and Rypinski A (2014) Ch. 5: Transportation. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, and Yohe GW (eds) Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, 130–149Google Scholar
  43. Scott D, Jones B, Konopek J (2007) Implications of climate and environmental change for nature-based tourism in the Canadian rocky mountains: a case study of Waterton lakes national park. Tour Manage 28:570–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Snover AK, Mauger GS, Whitely Binder LC, Krosby M, Tohver I (2013) Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation in Washington State: Technical Summaries for Decision Makers. State of Knowledge Report prepared for the Washington State Department of Ecology. Climate Impacts Group, University of Washington, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  45. Snover AK, Whitely Binder L, Lopez J, Willmott E, Kay J, Howell D, and Simmonds J (2007) Preparing for Climate Change: A Guidebook for Local, Regional, and State Governments. In association with and published by ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability, Oakland, CAGoogle Scholar
  46. Strauch RL, Raymond CL, Hamlet AF (2014) Climate change, hydrology, and access in the North Cascade Range. In: Raymond CL, Peterson DL, and Rochefort RM (eds) Climate change vulnerability and adaptation in the North Cascade Region, Washington. Gen Tech Rep PNW-GTR-892. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research StationGoogle Scholar
  47. Suffling R, Scott D (2002) Assessment of climate change effects on Canada’s national park system. Environ Monit Assess 74(2):117–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tohver, I, Hamlet AF, Lee S (2014) Impacts of 21st century climate change on hydrologic extremes in the Pacific Northwest region of North America. J Amer Water Resour Assoc 1–16, doi: 10.1111/jawr.12199
  49. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (USDA FS) (2010) National roadmap for responding to climate change. Washington, DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  50. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service (USDI NPS) (2010) Climate change response strategy. Climate Change Response Program. Washington, DC, USA, Available at: http://www.nps.gov/orgs/ccrp/upload/NPS_CCRS.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct. 2013
  51. Wall T, Meyer M (2013) Risk-Based Adaptation Frameworks for Climate Change Planning in the Transportation Sector. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  52. Whitely Binder LC, Krencicki Barcelos J, Booth DB et al (2010) Preparing for climate change in Washington State. Clim Chang 102(1–2):351–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. L. Strauch
    • 1
    Email author
  • C. L. Raymond
    • 2
  • R. M. Rochefort
    • 3
  • A. F. Hamlet
    • 4
  • C. Lauver
    • 5
  1. 1.Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Affairs & Real Estate DivisionSeattle City LightSeattleUSA
  3. 3.North Cascades National Park Service ComplexNational Park ServiceSedro-WoolleyUSA
  4. 4.Civil and Environmental Engineering and Earth SciencesUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  5. 5.Pacific Northwest CESU, National Park ServiceUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations