How to interpret expert judgment assessments of 21st century sea-level rise
- 1.6k Downloads
In a recent paper Bamber and Aspinall (Nat Clim Change 3:424–427, 2013) (BA13) investigated the sea-level rise that may result from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets during the 21st century. Using data from an expert judgment elicitation, they obtained a final high-end (P95) value of +84 cm integrated sea-level change from the ice sheets for the 2010–2100 period. However, one key message was left largely undiscussed: The experts had strongly diverging opinions about the ice-sheet contributions to sea-level rise. We argue that such (lack of) consensus should form an essential and integral part of the subsequent analysis of the data. By employing a method that keeps the level of consensus included, and that is also more robust to outliers and less dependent on the choice of the underlying distributions, we obtain on the basis of the same data a considerably lower high-end estimate for the ice-sheet contribution, +53 cm (+38-77 cm interquartile range of “expert consensus”). The method compares favourably with another recent study on expert judgement derived sea-level rise by Horton et al. (Q Sci Rev 84:1–6, 2014). Furthermore we show that the BA13 results are sensitive to a number of assumptions, such as the shape and minimum of the underlying distribution that were not part of the expert elicitation itself. Our analysis therefore demonstrates that one should be careful in considering high-end sea-level rise estimates as being well-determined and fixed numbers.
KeywordsExpert Elicitation Full Black Line Expert Answer Ocean Thermal Expansion Consensus Band
The authors thank Andreas Sterl, Renske de Winter and Thomas Reerink for constructive comments. The data is read off by eye from the supplementary material of BA13 where needed.
- Barrand NE, Hindmarsh RCA, Arthern RJ, Williams CR, Mouginot J, Scheuchl B, Rignot E, Ligtenberg SRM, Van Den Broeke MR, Edwards TL, Cook AJ, Simonsen SB (2013) Computing the volume response of the antarctic peninsula ice sheet to warming scenarios to 2200. J Glaciol 59(215):397–409. doi: 10.3189/2013JoG12J139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Church JA, Clark PU, Cazenave A, Gregory JM, Jevrejeva S, Levermann A, Merrifield MA, Milne GA, Nerem RS, Nunn PD, Payne AJ, Pfeffer WT, Stammer D, Unnikrishnan AS (2013) Chapter 13, sea level change. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM (eds) Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, NY, USA. www.ipcc.ch
- Cooke RM (1991) Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
- Davis CH, Li Y, McConnell JR, Frey MM, Hanna E (2005) Snowfall-driven growth in east antarctic ice sheet mitigates recent sea-level rise. Science 308(5730):1898–1901. doi: 10.1126/science.1110662. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/308/5730/1898.abstract CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Inter Academy Council (2010) Climate change assessments: review of the processes and procedures of the ipcc. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global Climate Projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Meinshausen M, Smith S, Calvin K, Daniel J, Kainuma M, Lamarque J-F, Matsumoto K, Montzka S, Raper S, Riahi K, Thomson A, Velders G, Van Vuuren DP (2011) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim Chang 109:213–241. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0156-z. ISSN 0165-0009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rignot E, Velicogna I, Van den Broeke MR, Monaghan A, Lenaerts JTM (2011) Acceleration of the contribution of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets to sea level rise. Geophys Res Lett 38(5). doi: 10.1029/2011GL046583. ISSN 1944-8007
- Schoof C (2012) Marine ice sheet stability. J Fluid Mechan 698(5):62–72. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2012.43. http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0022112012000432 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vaughan DG, Arthern R (2007) Why is it hard to predict the future of ice sheets?. Science 315(5818):1503–1504. doi: 10.1126/science.1141111. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/315/5818/1503.short CrossRefGoogle Scholar