Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 130, Issue 2, pp 273–286 | Cite as

Forestry professionals’ perceptions of climate change, impacts and adaptation strategies for forests in south-west Germany

  • Rasoul Yousefpour
  • Marc Hanewinkel
Article

Abstract

Forestry professionals’ perceptions of the risks and uncertainties associated with climate change were investigated in a questionnaire survey in south-west Germany. The respondents were employed in forestry in either public or private forests or working for state authorities. They were specifically asked about the related impacts of climate change on forest ecosystems, adaptive forest management and the potential of forestry to mitigate climate change. A factor analysis of the responses revealed significant variables explaining the major part of the variance and the key variable groups were identified in a canonical analysis. The majority of respondents (72 %) said they were under-informed, but most (83 %) view climate change as a reality, human-caused, and a significant risk. These forestry professionals were particularly concerned about extreme hazards, water scarcity, and changes in climatic zones. They generally said the potential of forestry to mitigate climate change is low, and saw few realistic measures like increased harvesting to substitute fossil fuels and energy-intensive materials for mitigation. Despite the uncertainty involved, adaptation strategies like using better-adapted tree species and provenances were mainly perceived as helpful, and tools such as spatially-explicit maps with recommendations for adapted species and indices of biotic and abiotic risks as important. The forestry professionals reported obtaining their information about climate change from advanced forestry training, the media, and scientific literature. The findings of the study are discussed in the light of the ongoing debate on climate change in Germany and recommendations made, including periodically checking and improving forestry professionals’ knowledge about climate change.

Keywords

Climate Change Forest Management Forest Owner Mitigate Climate Change Forest Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was part of the project MOTIVE “Models for Adaptive Forest Management”, funded by the European Commission (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 226544 and also was supported by the German Research Foundation's Emmy Noether Program (PO 1751/1-1). We thank Dr Silvia Dingwall, English Consultant at the Swiss Federal Research Institute (WSL) for having checked the language of the paper.

Supplementary material

10584_2015_1330_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (137 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 137 kb)

References

  1. Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Glob Environ Chang Human Policy Dimens 21:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blennow K, Olofsson E (2008) The probability of wind damage in forestry under a changed wind climate. Clim Chang 87:347–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blennow K, Persson J (2009) Climate change: motivation for taking measure to adapt. Glob Environ Chang 19:100–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blennow K, Persson J, Tomé M, Hanewinkel M (2012) Climate change: believing and seeing implies adapting. PLoS ONE 7(11):e50182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blennow K, Persson E, Lindner M, Faias SP, Hanewinkel M (2014) Forest owner motivations and attitudes towards supplying biomass for energy in Europe. Biomass Bioenergy 67:223–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolte A, Ammer C, Löf M, Madsen P, Nabuurs G-J, Schall P, Spathelf P, Rock J (2009a) Adaptive forest management in central Europe: climate change impacts, strategies and integrative concept. Scand J For Res 24:473–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolte A, Eisenhauer D, Ehrhart HP, Groß J, Hanewinkel M, Kölling C, Profft I, Rohde M, Röhe M, Amereller K (2009b) Klimawandel und Forstwirtschaft - Übereinstimmungen und Unterschiede bei der Einschätzung der Anpassungsnotwendigkeiten und Anpassungsstrategien der Bundesländer. Landbauforschung - vTI Agric For Res 4(2009):259–268Google Scholar
  8. Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ciais P, Reichstein M, Viovy N, Granier A, Oge’ J, Allard VA, Buchmann MN, Bernhofer C, Carrara A, Chevallier F, De Noblet N, Friend A, Friedlingstein P, Grünwald T, Heinesch B, Keronen P, Knohl A, Krinner G, Loustau D, Manca G, Matteucci G, Miglietta F, Ourcival J, Papale D, Pilegaard K, Rambal S, Seufert G, Soussana J, Sanz M, Schulze ED, Vesala T, Valentini R (2005) Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 437:529–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crona B, Wutich A, Brewis A, Gartin M (2013) Perceptions of climate change: linking local and global perceptions through a cultural knowledge approach. Clim Chang 119:519–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EpiData (2009) EpiData SoftwareGoogle Scholar
  12. forestDSS (2014) http://www.forestdss.org Community of Practice Forest Management Decision Support Systems - Accessed 07/2014
  13. Hanewinkel M, Breidenbach J, Neeff T, Kublin E (2008) Seventy-seven years of natural disturbances in a mountain forest area - the influence of storm, snow, and insect damage analysed with a long-term time series. Can J For Res-Revue Canadienne De Recherche Forestiere 38:2249–2261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanewinkel M, Cullmann D, Michiels H (2010) Künftige Baumarteneignung für Fichte und Buche in Südwestdeutschland. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift 65:30–33Google Scholar
  15. Hanewinkel M, Cullmann DA, Schelhaas MJ, Nabuurs GJ, Zimmermann NE (2013) Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nat Clim Chang 3:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heller NE, Zavaleta ES (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biol Conserv 142:14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  18. Jactel H, Petit J, Desprez-Loustau M-L, Delzon S, Piou D, Battisti A, Koricheva J (2012) Drought effects on damage by forest insects and pathogens: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 18:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jansen M, Döring C, Ahrends B, Bolte A, Czajkowski T, Panferov O, Albert M, Spellmann H, Nagel J, Lemme H, Habermann M, Staupendahl K, Möhring B, Böcher M, Storch S, Krott M, Nuske R, Thiele J, Nieschulze J, Saborowski J, Beese F (2008) Anpassungsstrategien für eine nachhaltige Waldbewirtschaftung unter sich wandelnden Klimabedingungen - Entwicklung eines Entscheidungsunterstützungssystems Wald und Klimawandel (DSS-WuK). Forstarchiv 79:131–142Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan S, Garrick BJ (1980) On The Quantitative Definition of Risk. Risk Anal 1:11–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kölling C, Dietz E, Falk W, Mellert K-H (2009) Provisorische Klima-Risikokarten als Planungshilfe für den klimagerechten Waldumbau in Bayern. Forst und Holz 64:40–47Google Scholar
  22. Kolström M, Lindner M, Vilén T, Maroschek M, Seidl R, Lexer MJ, Netherer S, Kremer A, Delzon S, Barbati A, Marchetti M, Corona P (2011) Reviewing the science and implementation of climate change adaptation measures in European forestry. Forest 2:961–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Neilson ET, Carroll AL, Ebata T, Safranyik L (2008) Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452:987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawrence A, Marzano M (2014) Is the private forest sector adapting to climate change? A study of forest managers in north Wales. Ann For Sci 71:291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindner M, Maroschek M, Netherer S, Kremer A, Barbatie A, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Seidl R, Delzon S, Corona P, Kolström M, Lexer MJ, Marchetti M (2010) Climate change impacts, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability of European forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 259:698–709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malmsheimer RW, Heffernan P, Brink S, Crandall D, Deneke F, Galik C, Gee E, Helms JA, McClure N, Mortimer M, Ruddell S, Smith M, Stewart J (2008) Forest management solutions for mitigating climate change in the United States. J For 106:115–117Google Scholar
  27. MEA (2003) Ecosystems and Human Wellbeing: A Report of the Conceptual Framework Working Group of the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. World Resoures Institute, Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Milad M, Schaich H, Bürgi M, Konold W (2011) Climate change and nature conservation in Central European forests: a review of consequences, concepts and challenges. For Ecol Manag 261:829–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nabuurs G-J, Lindner M, Verkerk PJ, Gunia K, Deda P, Michalak R, Grassi G (2013) First signs of carbon sink saturation in European forest biomass. Nat Clim Change 3:792–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Papageorgiou K, Kassioumis K, Blioumis V, Christodoulou A (2005) Linking quality of life and forest values in rural areas: an exploratory study of stakeholder perspectives in the rural community of Konitsa, Greece. Forestry 78:485–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pregernig M (2001) Values of forestry professionals and their implications for the applicability of policy instruments. Scand J For Res 16:278–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rammer W, Schauflinger C, Vacik H, Palma J, Garcia-Gonzalo J, Borges J, Lexer MJ (2013) Chapter X: a web-based ToolBox approach to support adaptive forest management under climate change. In: Fitzgerald J, Lindner M (eds) Adapting to climate change in European forests – Results of the MOTIVE project. Pensoft, Sofia, pp 93–100Google Scholar
  33. Reyer C, Lasch-Born P, Suckow F, Gutsch M, Murawski A, Pilz T (2014) Projections of regional changes in forest net primary productivity for different tree species in Europe driven by climate change and carbon dioxide. Ann For Sci 71:211–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sathre R, O’Connor J (2010) Meta-analysis of greenhouse gas displacement factors of wood product substitution. Environ Sci Pol 13:104–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schmidt M, Hanewinkel M, Kändler G, Kublin E, Kohnle U (2010) An inventory-based approach for modeling single tree storm damage - experiences with the winter storm 1999 in southwestern Germany. Can J For Res 40:1636–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Seidl R, Rammer W, Lexer MJ (2011) Adaptation options to reduce climate change vulnerability of sustainable forest management in the Austrian Alps. Can J For Res 41:694–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seppälä R, Buck A, Katila P (2009) Adaptation of Forests and People to Climate Change – A Global Assessment Report. Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on Adaptation of Forests to Climate Change. UFRO World Series, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  38. Spathelf P, van der Maaten E, van der Maaten-Theunissen M, Campioli M, Dobrowolska D (2014) Climate change impacts in European forests: the expert views of local observers. Ann For Sci 71:131–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spiecker H (2003) Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-temperate zone. J Environ Manag 67:55–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Spittlehouse DL, Stewart RB (2003) Adaptation to climate change in forest management. BC J Ecosyst Manag 4:1–11Google Scholar
  41. Taylor A, Bruine de Bruin W, Dessai S (2014) Climate change beliefs and perceptions of weather-related changes in the United Kingdom. Risk Anal. doi: 10.1111/risa.12234 Google Scholar
  42. Thuiller W, Lavergne S, Roquet C, Boulangeat I, Lafourcade B, Araujo M (2011) Consequences of climate change on the tree of life in Europe. Nature 470:531–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vagias-Wade M (2006) Likert-type scale response anchors. Clemson International Institute for Tourism & Research Development, Department of Parks, Recreation and Tourism Management. Clemson UniversityGoogle Scholar
  44. Volney WJA, Fleming RA (2000) Climate change and impacts of boreal forest insects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Williamson TB, Parkins JR, McFarlane BL (2005) Perceptions of climate change forest-based risk to forest ecosystems and communities. For Chron 81:710–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Winkel G, Gleißner J, Pistorius T, Sotirov M, Storch S (2011) The sustainably managed forest heats up: discursive struggles over forest management and climate change in Germany. Crit Policy Stud 5:361–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yousefpour R, Hanewinkel M (2009) Modelling of forest conversion planning with an adaptive simulation-optimization approach and simultaneous consideration of the values of timber, carbon and biodiversity. Ecol Econ 68:1711–1722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yousefpour R, Hanewinkel M (2014) Optimizing climate change strategies of adaptation to and mitigation of climate change for Norway Spruce (Picea abies Karst) forests with stochastic genetic algorithms. For Sci 60:73–84Google Scholar
  49. Yousefpour R, Jacobsen JB, Thorsen BJ, Meilby H, Hanewinkel M, Oehler K (2012) A review of decision-making approaches to handle uncertainty and risk in adaptive forest management under climate change (vol 69, pg 1, 2012). Ann For Sci 69:531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yousefpour R, Temperli C, Bugmann H, Elkin C, Hanewinkel M, Meilby H, Jacobsen JB, Thorsen BJ (2013) Updating beliefs and combining evidence in adaptive forest management under climate change: A case study of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst) in the Black Forest, Germany. J Environ Manag 122:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Forestry Economics and Forest PlanningUniversity of FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institute for MeteorologyHamburgGermany
  3. 3.Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow & Landscape Research WSLBirmensdorfSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations