Climatic Change

, Volume 128, Issue 1–2, pp 99–112 | Cite as

Assessing climate change impacts on European wind energy from ENSEMBLES high-resolution climate projections

  • Isabelle TobinEmail author
  • Robert Vautard
  • Irena Balog
  • François-Marie Bréon
  • Sonia Jerez
  • Paolo Michele Ruti
  • Françoise Thais
  • Mathieu Vrac
  • Pascal Yiou


Climate change may alter the geographical pattern and intensity of near-surface winds which are the “fuel” for wind turbines. In a context of fast current and planned development of wind power worldwide, investigating the impacts of climate change on wind power generation is necessary. This study aims at assessing future changes in the potential for wind power generation over the whole Europe and in the effective wind power production from national wind farms operating at the end of 2012 and planned by 2020. For this purpose, a simplified wind power generation model is applied to an ensemble of 15 regional climate projections achieved from 10 Regional Climate Models downscaling six Global Climate Models under the SRES A1B emission scenario from the ENSEMBLES project. The use of a relatively large multi-model ensemble allows the identification of robust changes and the estimation of a range of uncertainties associated with projected changes. We show with a high level of confidence that, under the A1B scenario, over most of Europe, changes in wind power potential will remain within ±15 and ±20 % by mid and late century respectively. Overall, we find a tendency toward a decrease of the wind power potential over Mediterranean areas and an increase over Northern Europe. Changes in multi-year power production will not exceed 5 and 15 % in magnitude at the European and national scale respectively for both wind farms in operation at the end of 2012 and planned by 2020. Therefore, climate change should neither undermine nor favor wind energy development in Europe. However, accounting for climate change effects in particular regions may help optimize the wind power development and energy mix plans.


Wind Speed Wind Turbine Wind Power Wind Energy Wind Farm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank the three reviewers for helping us clarify the manuscript. This research work has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007- 2013) under the project IMPACT2C: grant agreement n° 282746. The ENSEMBLES data used in this work was funded by the EU FP6 Integrated Project ENSEMBLES (Contract number 505539) whose support is acknowledged. We are grateful to Ole Christensen for providing additional information regarding the ENSEMBLES database. Results also used the methodology and expertise developed within the CLIMIX DSM-Energy project from the Commissariat à l’Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA).

Supplementary material

10584_2014_1291_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (5.4 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 5501 kb)


  1. Adams AS, Keith DW (2013) Are global wind power resources estimates overstated? Environ Res Lett 8:015021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barstad I, Sorteberg A, dos-Santos Mesquita M (2012) Present and future offshore wind power potential in northern Europe based on downscaled global climate runs with adjusted SST and sea ice cover. Renew En 44:398–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bichet A et al (2012) Causes for decadal variations of wind speed over land: sensitivity studies with a global climate model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, doi: 10.1029/2012GL051685
  4. Bloom A, Kotroni V, Lagouvardos K (2008) Climate change impact of wind energy availability in the Eastern Mediterranean using the regional climate model PRECIS. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:1249–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Capros P et al (2014) EU energy, transports and GHG emissions. Trends to 2050. Reference scenario 2013. European CommissionGoogle Scholar
  6. Cradden LC, Harrison GP, Chick JP (2012) Will climate change impact on wind power development in the UK? Clim Chang 115:837–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Déqué M et al (2012) The spread amongst ENSEMBLES regional scenarios: regional climate models, driving global circulation models and interannual variability. Clim Dyn 38:951–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donat MG et al (2010) European storminess and associated circulation weather types: future changes deduced from a multi-model ensemble of GCM simulations. Clim Res 42:27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dosio A, Paruolo P, Rojas R (2012) Bias correction of the ENSEMBLES high resolution climate change projections for use by impact models: Analysis of the climate change signal. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmospheres (1984–2012), 117 (D17)Google Scholar
  10. Elliott DL (1979) Adjustment and analysis of data for regional wind Energy assessments. Workshop on Wind Climate, Asheville, North CarolinaGoogle Scholar
  11. European Climate Foundation (2010) Roadmap 2050 : A practical guide to a prosperous, low-carbon Europe. Volume 1 : technical and economic assessmentGoogle Scholar
  12. Hueging H et al (2013) Regional changes in wind energy potential over Europe using regional climate model ensemble projections. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 52:903–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacob D et al (2013) EURO-CORDEX: new high-resolution climate change projections for European impact research. Reg Environ Chang. doi: 10.1007/s10113-013-0499-2 Google Scholar
  14. Jacobson MZ, Archer CL (2012) Saturation wind power potential and its implications for wind energy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:15679–15684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Justus CG, Mikhail A (1976) Height variation of wind speed and wind distributions statistics. Geophys Res Lett 3:261–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu J, Vecchi GA, Reichler T (2007) Expansion of the Hadley cell under global warming. Geophys Res Lett 34:L06805Google Scholar
  17. Marvel K, Kravitz B, Caldeira K (2012) Geophysical limits to global wind power. Nat Clim Chang 3:118–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Michelangeli PA, Vrac M, Loukos H (2009) Probabilistic downscaling approaches: application to wind cumulative distribution functions. Geophys Res Lett 36:L11708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mizuta R (2012) Intensification of extratropical cyclones associated with the polar jet change in the CMIP5 global warming projections. Geophys Res Lett 39:L19707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakicenovic, N., Swart, R. (eds) (2000) Emission Scenarios. A special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  21. Nolan P et al (2012) Simulating climate change and its effects on the wind energy resource of Ireland. Wind Energy 15:593–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pryor SC, Barthelmie RJ (2010) Climate change impacts on wind energy: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:430–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pryor SC, Barthelmie RJ, Kjellström E (2005) Potential climate change impact on wind energy resources in northern Europe: analyses using a regional climate model. Clim Dyn 25:815–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pryor SC, Schoof JT, Barthelmie RJ (2006) Winds of change?: Projections of near-surface winds under climate change scenarios. Geophys Res Lett 33:L11702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pryor SC et al (2012) Analyses of possible changes in intense and extreme wind speeds over Northern Europe under climate change scenarios. Clim Dyn 38:189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rasmussen DJ, Holloway T, Nemet GF (2011) Opportunities and challenges in assessing climate change impacts on wind energy - a critical comparison of wind speed projections over California. Environ Res Lett 6:0240008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruti PM et al (2008) Comparison of analyzed and measured wind speeds in the perspective of oceanic simulations over the Mediterranean basin: analyses, QuikSCAT and buoy data. J Mar Syst 70:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Samuelsson P et al (2011) The rossby centre regional climate model RCA3: model description and performance. Tellus A 63:4–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith A, Lott N, Vose R (2011) The integrated surface database: recent developments and partnerships. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 92:704–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van der Linden, P., and Mitchell, J.F.B. (eds.) (2009). ENSEMBLES: Climate Change and its Impacts: Summary of research and results from the ENSEMBLES project. Met Office Hadley Centre, FitzRoy Road, Exeter EX1 3 PB, UK. 160Google Scholar
  31. Vautard R et al (2010) Northern hemisphere atmospheric stilling partly attributed to an increase in surface roughness. Nat Geosci 3:756–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Vautard R et al (2014a) The European climate under a 2 °C global warming. Environ Res Lett 9:034006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vautard R et al (2014b) Regional climate model simulations indicate limited climatic impacts by operational and planned European wind farms. Nat Commun 5:3196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. International Energy Agency (IEA) (2013) Wind Power Technology Roadmap 2013 EditionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Isabelle Tobin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Robert Vautard
    • 1
  • Irena Balog
    • 2
  • François-Marie Bréon
    • 1
  • Sonia Jerez
    • 1
    • 3
  • Paolo Michele Ruti
    • 2
  • Françoise Thais
    • 4
  • Mathieu Vrac
    • 1
  • Pascal Yiou
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL, UMR 8212 CEA-CNRS-UVSQGif-sur-YvetteFrance
  2. 2.ENEA Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic DevelopmentUTMEA-CLIM Energy Environment Modeling Unit - Climate & Impact Modeling LaboratoryRomaItaly
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsUniversity of MurciaMurciaSpain
  4. 4.I-Tésé, Institut de Technico-Economie des Systèmes Energétiques, CEA/DEN/DANSGif-Sur-YvetteFrance

Personalised recommendations