Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 127, Issue 3–4, pp 493–504 | Cite as

Evacuation as a climate adaptation strategy for environmental justice communities

  • Laura KuhlEmail author
  • Paul H. Kirshen
  • Matthias Ruth
  • Ellen M. Douglas
Article

Abstract

With rising sea levels and possible storm intensification due to climate change, current United States urban coastal flood management strategies will be challenged. Due to limitations of current flood management strategies, evacuation is likely to become increasingly prominent in many coastal areas. Thus it is important to think critically about challenges for successful evacuation planning, particularly for vulnerable communities. This paper brings together the evacuation planning, climate change and environmental justice literatures. We describe the unique challenges that environmental justice communities face with evacuation, and identify best practice guidelines to improve the quality of evacuation planning for these communities. The guidelines presented, while not comprehensive, provide a framework for planners and policymakers to consider when developing evacuation plans, both for current and future climate conditions, and could improve the quality of evacuation planning.

Keywords

Social Capital Adaptation Strategy Social Vulnerability Disaster Risk Reduction Adaptation Option 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by grants from the NOAA Sectoral Applications Research Program (SARP; NAO08OAR4310722), NSF research grant 0966093 IGERT: Water Diplomacy, and a research grant from BP to the Center for International Environment and Resource Policy at the Fletcher School.

References

  1. Adger WN (2003) Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ Geogr 79:387–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Airriess CA, Li W, Leong KJ et al (2008) Church-based social capital, networks and geographical scale: Katrina evacuation, relocation, and recovery in a New Orleans Vietnamese American community. Geoforum 39:1333–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker EJ (1991) Hurricane evacuation behavior. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9:287–310Google Scholar
  5. Barnett J, O’Neill S (2010) Maladaptation. Glob Environ Chang 20(2):211–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (2004). At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodie M, Weltzien E, Altman D et al (2006) Experiences of Hurricane Katrina evacuees in Houston shelters: implications for future planning. Am J Public Health 96:1402–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bullard RD (ed) (2007) Growing smarter: achieving livable communities, environmental justice, and regional equity. MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark GE, Moser SC, Ratick SJ et al (1998) Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 3:59–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cordasco KM, Eisenman DP, Glik DC et al (2007) “They blew the levee”: distrust of authorities among Hurricane Katrina evacuees. J Health Care Poor Underserved 18:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Costa D, Kahn M (2003) Understanding the American decline in social capital, 1952–1988. KYKLOS Int Rev Soc Sci 56:17–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Bruin K, Dellink RB, Ruijs A, Bolwidt L, van Buuren A, Graveland J, de Groot RS, Kuikman PJ, Reinhard S, Roetter RP, Tassone VC, Verhagen A, van Ierland EC (2009) Adapting to climate change in The Netherlands: an inventory of climate adaptation options and ranking of alternatives. Clim Chang 95:23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Douglas E, Kirshen P, Paolisso M et al (2012) Coastal flooding, climate change and environmental justice: identifying obstacles and incentives for adaptation in two metropolitan Boston, Massachusetts communities. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 17:537–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dow K (1992) Exploring differences in our common future (s): the meaning of vulnerability to global environmental change. Geoforum 23(3):417–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dow K, Cutter C (2000) Public orders and personal opinions: household strategies for hurricane risk assessment. Environ Hazards 2:143–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drabek TE, Boggs KS (1968) Families in disaster: reactions and relatives. J Marriage Fam 30:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edmonds AS, Cutter SL (2008) Planning for pet evacuations during disasters. J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 5(1)Google Scholar
  18. Eisenman DP, Cordasco KM, Asch S et al (2007) Disaster planning and risk communication with vulnerable communities: lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Am J Public Health 97:S109–S115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Elder K, Xirasagar S, Miller N et al (2007) African Americans’ decisions not to evacuate New Orleans before Hurricane Katrina: a qualitative study. Am J Public Health 70:S124–S129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elliott JR, Pais J (2006) Race, class, and Hurricane Katrina: social differences in human responses to disaster. Soc Sci Res 35:295–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. EPA (2011) Plan EJ 2014. Office of Environmental Justice, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Few R, Brown K, Tompkins EL (2007) Public participation and climate change adaptation: avoiding the illusion of inclusion. Clim Pol 7:46–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flynn D (2007) The impact of disasters on small business disaster planning: a case study. Disasters 31:508–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gamper-Rabindran S, Timmins C (2011) Hazardous waste cleanup, neighborhood gentrification, and environmental justice: evidence from restricted access census block data. Am Econ Rev 101(3):620–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gotham KF, Campanella R (2011) Coupled vulnerability and resilience: the dynamics of cross-scale interactions in post-Katrina New Orleans. Ecol Soc 16, Article 12Google Scholar
  26. Hall JW, Lempert RJ, Keller K, Hackbarth A, Mijere C, McInerney DJ (2012) Robust climate policies under uncertainty: a comparison of robust decision making and info-gap methods. Risk Anal 32(10):1657–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob Environ Chang Hum Policy Dimens 19(2):240–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hawkins RL, Maurer K (2010) Bonding, bridging and linking: how social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. Br J Soc Work 40:1777–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heath SE, Kass PH, Beck AM, Glickman LT (2001) Human and pet-related risk factors for household evacuation failure during a natural disaster. Am J Epidemiol 153(7):659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heynen N, Perkins HA, Ro P (2006) The political ecology of uneven urban green space: the impact of political economy on race and ethnicity in producing environmental inequality in Milwaukee. Urban Aff Rev 42:3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. IPCC (2014) In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. JICA (Japan International Cooperation Agency) (2010) Handbook on Climate Change Adaptation in the Water Sector: a resilient approach that integrates water management and community development. Available at: http://www.jica.go.jp/english/our_work/thematic_issues/water/pdf/guideline_02.pdf
  33. Johnson CW (2005) Lessons from the evacuation of the World Trade Center, Sept 11th 2001 for the future development of computer simulations. Cogn Technol Work 7(4):214–240Google Scholar
  34. Kenyon W (2007) Evaluating flood risk management options in Scotland: a participant-led multi-criteria approach. Ecol Econ 6(4):70–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keogh D, Apan A, Mushtaq S, King D, Thomas M (2011) Resilience, vulnerability and adaptive capacity of an inland rural town prone to flooding: a climate change adaptation case study of Charleville, Queensland, AU. Nat Hazards 59:699–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kim J, Soo Oh S (2013) The virtuous circle in disaster recovery: who returns and stays in town after disaster evacuation? J Risk Res 1Google Scholar
  37. Kirshen P, Douglas E, Paolisso M et al (2012) Community attitudes to adaptation to coastal flooding under climate change. In: Karl HA, Scarlett L, Vargas-Moreno JC, Flaxman M (eds) Restoring land- coordinating science, politics and action: complexities of climate and governance. Springer, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  38. Kirshen P, Caputo L, Vogel R, Mathisen P, Rosner A, Renaud T (2014) Adapting urban infrastructure to climate change: a drainage case study. J Water Resour Plan Manag, in pressGoogle Scholar
  39. Kleinosky LR, Yarnal B, Fisher A (2007) Vulnerability of Hampton Roads, Virginia to storm-surge flooding and sea-level rise. Nat Hazards 40(1):43–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. LaLone MB (2012) Neighbors helping neighbors an examination of the social capital mobilization process for community resilience to environmental disasters. J Appl Soc Sci 6(2):209–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lange H, Garrelts H, Osthorst et al (2009) Distributional effects and change of risk management regimes: explaining different types of adaptation in Germany and Indonesia. In: Ruth M, Ibarraran ME (eds) Distributional impacts of climate change and disasters. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  42. Leatherman SP (1996) Shoreline stabilization approaches in response to sea level rise: US experience and implications for Pacific Island and Asian nations. Water Air Soil Pollut 92:149–157Google Scholar
  43. Levy JK, Gopalakrishnan C (2010) A policy-focused approach to natural hazards and disasters—towards disaster risk reduction (DRR): introduction to a special issue of the Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research. J Nat Resour Policy Res 2:317–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li W, Airriess CA, Chia-Chen Chen A, Leong KL, Keith V (2010) Katrina and migration: evacuation and return by African Americans and Vietnamese Americans in an Eastern New Orleans Suburb. Prof Geogr 62(1):103–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liu R, Schachter HL (2007) Emergency response plans and needs of communities with limited english proficiency. Transp Res Rec 2013:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maantay J, Maroko A (2009) Mapping urban risk: flood hazards, race, & environmental justice in New York. Appl Geogr 29(1):111–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martinich J, Neumann J, Ludwig L, Jantarasami L (2012) Risks of sea level rise to disadvantaged communities in the United States. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change http://www.springerlink.com/content/x411112212347762/
  48. McGee TK (2011) Public engagement in neighbourhood level wildfire mitigation and preparedness: case studies from Canada, the US and Australia. J Environ Manag 92:2524–2532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGee TK, Russell S (2003) “It’s just a natural way of life…” an investigation of wildfire preparedness in rural Australia. Glob Environ Chang B Environ Hazards 5(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McLeman R, Smit B (2006) Migration as an adaptation to climate change. Clim Chang 76:31–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The Netherlands (2009) National water plan. The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  52. Morrow BH (1999) Identifying and mapping community vulnerability. Disasters 23:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moth PD (2008) Examining the environmental justice of sea level rise and storm tides in New Zealand, PhD Dissertation. University of Canterbury, http://hdl.handle.net/10092/2649
  54. Multihazard Mitigation Council (2005) Natural hazard mitigation saves: an independent study to assess the future savings from mitigation activities. The National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  55. National Research Council (2010) Adapting to the impacts of climate change, America’s climate choices: panel on adapting to the impacts of climate change. The National Academies Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  56. Neumann JE, Hudgens DE, Herter J, Martinich J (2010) Assessing sea-level rise impacts: a GIS-based framework and application to coastal New Jersey. Coast Manag 38(4):433–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Paolisso M, Douglas E, Enrici A et al (2012) Climate change, justice, and adaptation among African American communities in the Chesapeake Bay region. Weather Clim Soc 4:34–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pastor M, Sadd J, Hipp J (2001) Which came first? Toxic facilities, minority move-in, and environmental justice. J Urban Aff 23:1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peacock WG, Brody SD, Highfield W (2005) Hurricane risk perceptions among Florida’s single family homeowners. Landsc Urban Plan 73:120–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. EarthscanGoogle Scholar
  61. Pellow DN (2001) Environmental justice and the political process: movements, corporations, and the state. Sociol Q 42(1):47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Porio E (2011) Vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience to floods and climate change-related risks among marginal, riverine communities in Metro Manila. Asian J Soc Sci 39:425–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Quarantelli EL (1985) What is disaster? The need for clarification in definition and conceptualization in research. Available at: http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/1119
  64. Renne JL, Sanchez TW, Litman T (2008) National study on carless and special needs evacuation planning: a literature review. University of New Orleans Transportation Center, New OrleansGoogle Scholar
  65. Rodriguez H, Trainor J, Quarantelli EL (2006) Rising to the challenges of a catastrophe: the emergent and prosocial behavior following Hurricane Katrina. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 604(1):82–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rohrmann B (2000) Critical assessment of information on bushfire preparedness for residents. Aust J Emerg Manag 15(1):14–19Google Scholar
  67. Ruth M, Kirshen P, Coelho D (2009) Climate change and cities: differential impacts and adaptation options in industrialized countries. In: Ruth M, Ibarraran ME (eds) Differential impacts of climate change. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  68. Rygel L, O’sullivan D, Yarnal B (2006) A method for constructing a social vulnerability index: an application to hurricane storm surges in a developed country. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11(3):741–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Spence PR, Lachlan KA, Griffin DR (2007) Crisis communication, race, and natural disaster. J Black Stud 37:539–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stakhiv E, Olsen R, Kiang J, Waskom R (2010) Practical approaches to water management under climate change uncertainty, workshop on nonstationarity, hydrologic frequency analysis, and water management. Colorado Water Institute Information Series, Rep. 109. Colorado Water Institute, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  71. Stallings RA (1991) Ending evacuations. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 9(2):183–200Google Scholar
  72. Strauss BH, Ziemlinski R, Weiss JL, Overpeck JT (2012) Tidally adjusted estimates of topographic vulnerability to sea level rise and flooding for the contiguous United States. Environ Res Lett 7(1):014033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tebaldi C, Strauss B, Zervas C (2012) Modeling sea level rise impacts on storm surges along US coasts. Environ Res Lett 7:14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tingsanchali T (2012) Urban flood disaster management. Procedia Eng 32:25–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Toldson IA, Ray K, Smith Hatcher S et al (2011) Examining the long-term racial disparities in health and economic conditions among Hurricane Katrina survivors: policy implications for Gulf Coast recovery. J Black Stud 42:360–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Towers G (2000) Applying the political geography of scale: grassroots strategies and environmental justice. Prof Geogr 52(1):23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8074–8079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. University College of London Benfield Greig Hazard Research Center, Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Diseases et al (2002) Development at risk—the brief for the World Summit on Sustainable DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  79. Valverde HR, Trembanis C, Pilkey OH (1999) Summary of beach nourishment: episodes on the US East Coast barrier islands. J Coast Res 15:1100–1118Google Scholar
  80. Vermeer M, Rahmstorf S (2009) Global sea level linked to global temperature. PNAS 106:21527–21532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Warner K, Zissener M, Kreft S, Hoppe P et al (2010) Solutions for vulnerable countries and people: designing and implementing disaster risk reduction & insurance for adaptation. Munich Climate Insurance Initiative, MunichGoogle Scholar
  82. Whitehead JC, Edwards B, Van Willigen M et al (2000) Heading for higher ground: factors affecting real and hypothetical hurricane evacuation behavior. Environ Hazards 2:133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yohe G (2009) Toward an integrated framework derived from a risk-management approach to climate change: an editorial comment. Clim Chang 95:325–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zagonari F (2013) Implementing a transboundary flood risk management plan: a method for determining willingness to cooperate and case study for the Scheldt Estuary. Nat Hazards 66:1101–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zander K, Petheram L, Garnett S (2013) Stay or leave? Potential climate change adaptation strategies among aboriginal people in coastal communities in Northern Australia. Nat Hazards 67:591–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zarcadoolas C, Boyer J, Krishnaswami A et al (2007) GIS maps to communicate emergency preparedness: how useable are they for inner city residents? J Homel Secur Emerg Manag 4, Article 16Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura Kuhl
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paul H. Kirshen
    • 2
  • Matthias Ruth
    • 3
  • Ellen M. Douglas
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for International Environment and Resource Policy, The Fletcher SchoolTufts UniversityMedfordUSA
  2. 2.Environmental Research Group, Civil Engineering Department & Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and SpaceUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  3. 3.School of Public Policy and Urban Affairs, and Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA
  4. 4.School of the EnvironmentUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations