Climatic Change

, Volume 127, Issue 2, pp 381–389 | Cite as

Mapping the shadow of experience of extreme weather events

  • Peter D. HoweEmail author
  • Hilary Boudet
  • Anthony Leiserowitz
  • Edward W. Maibach


Climate change will increase the frequency and/or intensity of certain extreme weather events, and perceived experience with extreme weather may influence climate change beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. However, the aspects of extreme events that influence whether or not people perceive that they have personally experienced them remain unclear. We investigate (1) the correspondence of reported experience of extreme weather events with documented events, and (2) how characteristics of different extreme events shape the geographic area within which people are likely to report they have experienced it—the event’s perceived “shadow of experience.” We overlay geocoded survey responses indicating personal experience with hurricanes, tornadoes, and drought—from a 2012 nationally representative survey (N = 1,008) of U.S. residents—on maps of recorded event impacts. We find that reported experiences correspond well with recorded event impacts, particularly for hurricanes and tornadoes. Reported experiences were related to event type, proximity, magnitude and duration. The results suggest locations where disaster preparedness efforts and climate change education campaigns could be most effective after an extreme weather event.


Extreme Weather Event Distance Band Climate Change Education Climate Change Belief Cumulative Response Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Akerlof K, Maibach EW, Fitzgerald D et al (2013) Do people “personally experience” global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob Environ Chang 21:81–91. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley A, Turner R (2005) Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J Stat Softw 12:1–42Google Scholar
  3. Brody SD, Zahran S, Vedlitz A, Grover H (2008) Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ Behav 40:72–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callegaro M, DiSogra C (2008) Computing response metrics for online panels. Public Opin Q 72:1008–1032. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfn065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang L, Krosnick JA (2009) National surveys via RDD telephone interviewing versus the internet: comparing sample representativeness and response quality. Public Opin Q 73:641–678. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfp075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coumou D, Rahmstorf S (2012) A decade of weather extremes. Nat Clim Chang 2:491–496. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1452 Google Scholar
  7. Davies TM, Hazelton ML, Marshall JC (2011) Sparr: analyzing spatial relative risk using fixed and adaptive kernel density estimation in R. J Stat Softw 39:1–14Google Scholar
  8. Egan PJ, Mullin M (2012) Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. J Polit 74:796–809. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goebbert K, Jenkins-Smith HC, Klockow K et al (2012) Weather, climate and worldviews: the sources and consequences of public perceptions of changes in local weather patterns. Weather Clim Soc 4:132–144. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00044.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hamilton LC, Stampone MD (2013) Blowin’ in the wind: short-term weather and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Weather Clim Soc 5:112–119. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00048.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hartter J, Stampone MD, Ryan SJ et al (2012) Patterns and perceptions of climate change in a biodiversity conservation hotspot. PLoS ONE 7:e32408. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032408 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Howe PD, Leiserowitz A (2013) Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the U.S. Glob Environ Chang 23:1488–1500. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Howe PD, Markowitz EM, Lee TM et al (2013) Global perceptions of local temperature change. Nat Clim Chang 3:352–356. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1768 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Hmielowski JD (2012) Extreme weather, climate & preparedness in the American mind. Yale University and George Mason University, Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, New Haven, CTGoogle Scholar
  16. Maibach EW, Cobb S, Leiserowitz A et al (2011) A national survey of television meteorologists about climate change: education. George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication, FairfaxGoogle Scholar
  17. Marin A (2010) Riders under storms: contributions of nomadic herders’ observations to analysing climate change in Mongolia. Glob Environ Chang 20:162–176. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.10.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marx SM, Weber EU, Orlove BS et al (2007) Communication and mental processes: experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Glob Environ Chang 17:47–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGee TK, McFarlane BL, Varghese J (2009) An examination of the influence of hazard experience on wildfire risk perceptions and adoption of mitigation measures. Soc Nat Resour 22:308. doi: 10.1080/08941920801910765 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C et al (2013) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Chang 3:343–347. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1754 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NCDC (2013) Storm Events Database | National Climatic Data Center. In: Natl Ocean Atmospheric Adm. Accessed 17 Sept 2013
  22. NCDC (2012) State of the climate: annual 2011. National Climatic Data Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  23. Peterson TC, Stott PA, Herring S (2012) Explaining extreme events of 2011 from a climate perspective. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:1041–1067. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00021.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ruddell D, Harlan SL, Grossman-Clarke S, Chowell G (2012) Scales of perception: public awareness of regional and neighborhood climates. Clim Chang 111:581–607. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0165-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rudman LA, McLean MC, Bunzl M (2013) When truth is personally inconvenient, attitudes change: the impact of extreme weather on implicit support for green politicians and explicit climate-change beliefs. Psychol Sci 24:2290–2296. doi: 10.1177/0956797613492775 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Silver A, Andrey J (2014) The influence of previous disaster experience and sociodemographics on protective behaviors during two successive tornado events. Weather Clim Soc 6:91–103. doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-13-00026.1
  27. SPC (2013) Storm Prediction Center severe weather GIS (SVRGIS). In: Natl Ocean Atmospheric Adm Natl Weather Serv. Accessed 17 Sept 2013
  28. Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon NF (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang 1:46–49. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1059 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stoffle RW, Traugott MW, Stone JV et al (1991) Risk perception mapping: using ethnography to define the locally affected population for a low-level radioactive waste storage facility in Michigan. Am Anthropol 93:611–635. doi: 10.1525/aa.1991.93.3.02a00050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stone JV (2001) Risk perception mapping and the Fermi II nuclear power plant: toward an ethnography of social access to public participation in Great Lakes environmental management. Environ Sci Pol 4:205–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tierney KJ (2007) From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads. Annu Rev Sociol 33:503–525. doi: 10.1146/annurev.soc.33.040406.131743 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wachinger G, Renn O, Begg C, Kuhlicke C (2013) The risk perception paradox—implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Anal 33:1049–1065. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zaalberg R, Midden C, Meijnders A, McCalley T (2009) Prevention, adaptation, and threat denial: flooding experiences in the Netherlands. Risk Anal 29:1759–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zaval L, Keenan EA, Johnson EJ, Weber EU (2014) How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nat Clim Chang 4:143–147. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2093 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao X, Maibach E, Gandy J et al (2014) Climate change education through TV weathercasts: results of a field experiment. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 95:117–130. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00144.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter D. Howe
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hilary Boudet
    • 2
  • Anthony Leiserowitz
    • 3
  • Edward W. Maibach
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Environment and Society, Quinney College of Natural ResourcesUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, School of Public PolicyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  4. 4.Center for Climate Change CommunicationGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations