Climatic Change

, Volume 130, Issue 3, pp 383–395 | Cite as

North–south convergence and the allocation of CO2 emissions

  • Humberto Llavador
  • John E. Roemer
  • Joaquim Silvestre
Article

Abstract

Mankind must cooperate to reduce GHG emissions to prevent a catastrophic rise in global temperature. How can the costs of reducing GHG emissions be allocated across regions of the world and simultaneously address growth? We postulate a two-region world and, based on sustainability and egalitarian criteria, calculate optimal paths in which a South, like China, and a North, like the United States, converge in welfare per capita to a path of sustained growth of 1 % per year by 2085, while global CO2 emissions are restricted to a conservative path, constructed from the Representative Concentration Pathway RCP3-PD scenario, that leads to the stabilization of concentrations around 450 ppm CO2, providing an expected temperature change not exceeding 2 °C. It follows from our analysis that growth expectations in the North and the South should be scaled back substantially, not only after 2085, but also in the transition period. Feasible growth paths with low levels of emissions would require heavy investments in education and knowledge. Northern and Southern growth should be restricted to about 1 % and 2.5 % per year, respectively, over the next 75 years. Politicians who wish to solve the global-warming problem should prepare their polities to accept this reality.

JEL Classification

D63 F53 O40 O41 Q50 Q54 Q56 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to three referees and the guest editors of Climatic Change for detailed and useful suggestions. We thank the audiences in various presentations, in particular in the Workshop on Multi-disciplinary Perspectives on Climate Ethics, Como, Italy. We also thank Thomas Stoerk for very diligent research assistantship. Humberto Llavador acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the Severo Ochoa Programme for Centers of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2011-0075) and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the research grants (ECO2011-28965) and (EC-2012-36200).

Supplementary material

10584_2014_1227_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (4 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 4073 kb)

References

  1. Arrow K, Dasgupta P, Goulder L, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Heal G, Levin S, Mäler KG, Schneider S, Starrett D, Walker B (2004) Are we consuming too much? J Econ Perspect 18:147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benhabib J, Spiegel M (2005) Human capital and technology diffusion. In: Aghion P, Durlauf SN (eds) Handbook of Economic Growth, vol 1A North-Holland. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 935–966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnosky AD, Hadly EA, Bascompte J, Berlow EL, Brown JH, Fortelius M, Getz WM, Harte J, Hastings A, Marquet PA, Martinez ND, Mooers A, Roopnarine P, Vermeij G, Williams JW, Gillespie R, Kitzes J, Marshall C, Matzke N, Mindell DP, Revilla E, Smith AB (2012) Approaching a state shift in Earth’s biosphere. Nature 486:52–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eaton J, Kortum S (1999) International technology diffusion: Theory and measurement. Int. Econ Rev 40:537–70Google Scholar
  5. Gordon RJ (2012) Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds. NBER Working Paper 18315 Google Scholar
  6. Keller W (2004) International technology diffusion. J Econ Lit 42:752–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Llavador H, Roemer JE, Silvestre J (2010) Intergenerational justice when future worlds are uncertain. J Math Econ 46:728–761CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Llavador H, Roemer JE, Silvestre J (2011) A dynamic analysis of human welfare in a warming planet. J Pub Econ 95:1607–1620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Llavador H, Roemer JE, Silvestre J (2013) Should we sustain? And if so, sustain what? Consumption or quality of life? In: Fouquet R (ed) Handbook of energy and climate change. Palgrave, London, pp 639–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Meinshausen M, Smith SJ, Calvin K, Daniel JS, Kainuma MLT, Lamarque JF, Matsumoto K et al (2011) The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Climatic Change 109(1-2):213–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nelson RR, Phelps ES (1966) Investment in humans. technological diffusion, and economic growth. Am Econ Rev 56(1/2):69–75Google Scholar
  12. Neumayer E (2013) Weak versus strong sustainability: exploring the limits of two opposing paradigms. 4th. Edward Elgar Publishing, CheltenhamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nordhaus W (2008) A question of balance: Weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  14. Nordhaus W (2013) The climate casino: Risk. uncertainty and economics for a warming world. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  15. Roemer JE (2011) The ethics of intertemporal distribution in a warming planet. Environ Resour Econ 48:363–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rogoff K (2012) Rethinking the growth imperative. Project Syndicate. http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/rethinking-the-growth-imperative. Accessed 20 June 2013
  17. Skidelsky R, Skidelsky E (2012) How Much is Enough? Other Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Solow R (1993) An almost practical step toward sustainability. Res Pol 19:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. United Nations (2013) World population prospects: The 2012 revision. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp. Accessed August 8 2013
  21. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melilo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth’s ecosystem. Science 277:494–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Vuuren DP, Lucas P, Eickhout B, Strengers B, van Ruijven B, Wonink W, van Houdt R (2007) Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: An assessment of reduction strategies and costs. Climatic Change 81:119–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, den Elzen MGJ, Krarn T, van Vliet J, Deetman S, Isaac M et al (2011) RCP2. 6: Exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2°C. Climatic Change 109(1-2):95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. World Resources Institute (2013) Climate Analysis Indicators Tool (CAIT 2.0). http://cait2.wri.org/wri. Accessed 8 August 2013

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Humberto Llavador
    • 1
  • John E. Roemer
    • 2
  • Joaquim Silvestre
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF) and Barcelona GSEBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations