Climatic Change

, Volume 125, Issue 3–4, pp 413–427

A probabilistic framework for assessing vulnerability to climate variability and change: the case of the US water supply system

Article

Abstract

We introduce a probabilistic framework for vulnerability analysis and use it to quantify current and future vulnerability of the US water supply system. We also determine the contributions of hydro-climatic and socio-economic drivers to the changes in projected vulnerability. For all scenarios and global climate models examined, the US Southwest including California and the southern Great Plains was consistently found to be the most vulnerable. For most of the US, the largest contributions to changes in vulnerability come from changes in supply. However, for some areas of the West changes in vulnerability are caused mainly by changes in demand. These changes in supply and demand result mainly from changes in evapotranspiration rather than from changes in precipitation. Importantly, changes in vulnerability from projected changes in the standard deviations of precipitation and evapotranspiration are of about the same magnitude or larger than those from changes in the corresponding means over most of the US, except in large areas of the Great Plains, in central California and southern and central Texas.

Supplementary material

10584_2014_1111_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (3 mb)
ESM 1(PDF 3105 kb)

References

  1. Barnett TP, Pierce DW (2008) When will Lake Mead go dry? Water Resour Res 44, W03201Google Scholar
  2. Barnett TP, Pierce DW (2009) Sustainable water deliveries from the Colorado River in a changing climate. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106:7334–7338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnett T, Malone R, Pennell W, Stammer D, Semtner B, Washington W (2004) The effects of climate change on water resources in the West: introduction and overview. Clim Chang 62:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett TP, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Potential impacts of a warming climate on water availability in snow-dominated regions. Nature 438:303–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown TC (2000) Projecting U.S. freshwater withdrawals. Water Resour Res 36:769–780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown TC, Foti R, Ramirez JA (2013) Projected freshwater withdrawals in the United States under a changing climate. Water Resour Res 49:1259–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cayan DR, Das T, Pierce DW, Barnett TP, Tyree M, Gershunov A (2010) Future dryness in the southwest US and the hydrology of the early 21st century drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(50):21271–21276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen NS, Lettenmaier DP (2007) A multimodel ensemble approach to assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 11:1417–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen N, Wood A, Voisin N, Lettenmaier D, Palmer R (2004) The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River Basin. Clim Chang 62:337–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clow DW (2009) Changes in the timing of snowmelt and streamflow in Colorado: a response to recent warming. J Clim 23:2293–2306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawadi S, Ahmad S (2012) Changing climatic conditions in the Colorado River Basin: implications for water resources management. J Hydrol 430–431:127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dettinger M, Cayan D, Meyer M, Jeton A (2004) Simulated hydrologic responses to climate variations and change in the Merced, Carson, and American River Basins, Sierra Nevada, California, 1900–2099. Clim Chang 62:283–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eagleson PS (1978) Climate, soil, and vegetation. 6. Dynamics of annual water-balance. Water Resour Res 14:749–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Famiglietti JS, Lo M, Ho SL, Bethune J, Anderson KJ, Syed TH, Swenson SC, Linage CR, Rodell M (2011) Satellites measure recent reates of groundwater depletion in California’s Central Valley. Geophys Res Lett 38:L03403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foti R (2011) Part A: a probabilistic framework for assessing vulnerability to climate variability and change: the case of the US water supply system. Part B: dynamics of self-organized vegetation patterns. PhD thesis, Colorado State Univeristy, Fort CollinsGoogle Scholar
  16. Foti R, Ramirez JA, Brown TC (2012) Vulnerability of U.S. water supply to shortage: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, p 147Google Scholar
  17. Hamlet AF, Mote PW, Clark MP, Lettenmaier DP (2005) Effects of temperature and precipitation variability on snowpack trends in the Western United States*. J Clim 18:4545–4561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hurd B, Leary N, Jones R, Smith J (1999) Relative regional vulnerability of water resources to climate change. J Am Water Res Assoc 35:1399–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenny JF, Barber NL, Hutson SS, Linsey KS, Lovelace JK, Maupin MA (2009) Estimated use of water in the United States in 2005. U. S. Geological Survey, Reston, p 52Google Scholar
  20. Kochendorfer JP, Ramirez JA (1996) Integrated hydrological/ecological/economic modeling for examining the vulnerability of water resources to climate change. In: North American Water and Environment Congress ‘96 – ASCE. ASCE, New York, pp. 2157–2162Google Scholar
  21. Labadie JW, Larson R (2007) MODSIM 8.1: River basin management decision support system: user manual and documentation. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, p 123Google Scholar
  22. Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, Rovere ELL, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H-H, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, Sv R, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) Emissions scenarios: a special report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 599Google Scholar
  23. Price DT, McKenney DW, Papadopol P, Logan T, Hutchinson MF (2006) High-resolution climate change scenarios for North America. Canadian Forestry Service, Sault Ste, MarieGoogle Scholar
  24. Roy SB, Chen L, Girvetz E, Maurer EP, Mills WB, Grieb TM (2012) Projecting water withdrawal and supply for future decades in the U.S. under climate change scenarios. Environ Sci Technol 46:2545–2556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scanlon BR, Faunt CC, Longuevergne L, Reedy RC, Alley WM, McGuired VL, McMahone PB (2012) Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. PNAS 109:9320–9325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. U.S. Water Resources Council (1978) The nation’s water resources 1975–2000. U. S. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  27. Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerabilty from climate and population growth. Science 289:284–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zarnoch SJ, Cordell HK, Betz CJ, Langner L (2010) Projecting county-level populations under three climate change future scenarios: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA assessment. Southern Research Station, U. S. Forest Service, Ashville, p 8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Romano Foti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jorge A. Ramirez
    • 2
  • Thomas C. Brown
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringPrinceton UniversityPrincetonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  3. 3.Rocky Mountain Research Station, U. S. Forest ServiceFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations