Climatic Change

, Volume 123, Issue 3–4, pp 651–664 | Cite as

Transport electrification: A key element for energy system transformation and climate stabilization

  • David McCollum
  • Volker Krey
  • Peter Kolp
  • Yu Nagai
  • Keywan Riahi
Article

Abstract

This paper analyzes the role of transport electrification in the broader context of energy system transformation and climate stabilization. As part of the EMF27 model inter-comparison exercise, we employ the MESSAGE integrated assessment modeling framework to conduct a systematic variation of availability, cost, and performance of particular energy supply technologies, thereby deriving implications for feasibility of climate stabilization goals and the associated costs of mitigation. In addition, we explore a wide range of assumptions regarding the potential degree of electrification of the transportation sector. These analyses allow us to (i) test the extent to which the feasible attainment of stringent climate policy targets depends on transport electrification, and (ii) assess the far-reaching impacts that transport electrification could have throughout the rest of the energy system. A detailed analysis of the transition to electricity within the transport sector is not conducted. Our results indicate that while a low-carbon transport system built upon conventional liquid-based fuel delivery infrastructures is destined to become increasingly reliant on biofuels and synthetic liquids, electrification opens up a door through which nuclear energy and non-biomass renewables can flow. The latter has important implications for mitigation costs.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We recognize the technical contributions of Patrick Sullivan to this analysis. The Sankey-type flow diagrams were developed using the Fineo software made available by the DensityDesign Research Lab of the Politecnico di Milano. The comments of the editor and anonymous reviewers helped to substantially improve this paper.

Supplementary material

10584_2013_969_MOESM1_ESM.docx (512 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 512 kb)

References

  1. Anderson K, Bows A (2011) Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: Emission scenarios for a new world. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 369:20–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azar C, Lindgren K, Larson E, Möllersten K (2006) Carbon capture and storage from fossil fuels and biomass—costs and potential role in stabilizing the atmosphere. Clim Chang 74:47–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bosetti V, Longden T (2013) Light duty vehicle transportation and global climate policy: The importance of electric drive vehicles. Energy Policy 58:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calvin K, Wise M, Klein D, McCollum D, Tavoni M, van der Zwaan B, van Vuuren D (2013) A multi-model analysis of the regional and sectoral roles of bioenergy in near-term and long-term carbon mitigation. Climate Change Economics.Google Scholar
  5. Cherp A, Adenikinju A, Goldthau A, Hughes L, Jansen J, Jewell J, Olshanskaya M, Soares de Oliveira R, Sovacool B, Vakulenko S (2012) Chapter 5—energy and security. Global energy assessment—toward a sustainable future, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, pp. 325–384.Google Scholar
  6. Clarke L, Edmonds J, Krey V, Richels R, Rose S, Tavoni M (2009) International climate policy architectures: Overview of the EMF 22 International Scenarios. Energy Economics 31:S64–S81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Edenhofer O, Knopf B, Barker T, Baumstark L, Bellevrat E, Chateau B, Criqui P, Isaac M, Kitous A, Kypreos S, Leimbach M, Lessmann K, Magne B, Scrieciu Å, Turton H, Van Vuuren DP (2010) The economics of low stabilization: Model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. Energy Journal 31:11–48Google Scholar
  8. Edmonds J, Wilson T, Wise M, Weyant J (2006) Electrification of the economy and CO2 emissions mitigation. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 7:175–203Google Scholar
  9. Grahn M, Azar C, Lindgren K, Berndes G, Gielen D (2007) Biomass for heat or as transportation fuel? A comparison between two model-based studies. Biomass Bioenergy 31:747–758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gül T, Kypreos S, Turton H, Barreto L (2009) An energy-economic scenario analysis of alternative fuels for personal transport using the Global Multi-regional MARKAL model (GMM). Energy 34:1423–1437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedenus F, Karlsson S, Azar C, Sprei F (2010) Cost-effective energy carriers for transport—The role of the energy supply system in a carbon-constrained world. Int J Hydrog Energy 35:4638–4651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IEA (2012) Energy technology perspectives 2012: Pathways to a clean energy system. International Energy Agency (IEA), ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Krey V, Riahi K (2009) Implications of delayed participation and technology failure for the feasibility, costs, and likelihood of staying below temperature targets—greenhouse gas mitigation scenarios for the 21st century. Energy Economics 31:S94–S106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kriegler E, Weyant JP, Blanford GJ, Krey V, Clarke L, Edmonds J, Fawcett A, Luderer G, Riahi K, Richels R, Rose SK, Tavoni M, van Vuuren DP (2013) The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: Overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0953-7
  15. Kyle P, Kim SH (2011) Long-term implications of alternative light-duty vehicle technologies for global greenhouse gas emissions and primary energy demands. Energy Policy 39:3012–3024CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luderer G, Bosetti V, Jakob M, Leimbach M, Steckel JC, Waisman H, Edenhofer O (2012) The economics of decarbonizing the energy system-results and insights from the RECIPE model intercomparison. Clim Chang 114:9–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCollum DL, Krey V, Riahi K (2012) Beyond Rio: Sustainable energy scenarios for the 21st century. Natural Resources Forum.Google Scholar
  18. OECD/ITF (2012) Transport outlook 2012: Seamless transport for greener growth. International Transport Forum (ITF) of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), ParisGoogle Scholar
  19. Ogden J, Anderson L (eds.) (2011) Sustainable transportation energy pathways: A research summary for decision makers, The Regents of the University of California, Davis campus.Google Scholar
  20. Pacala S, Socolow R (2004) Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968–972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Riahi K, Dentener F, Gielen D, Grubler A, Jewell J, Klimont Z, Krey V, McCollum D, Pachauri S, Rao S, van Ruijven B, van Vuuren DP, Wilson C (2012) Chapter 17 - Energy Pathways for Sustainable Development. Global Energy Assessment—Toward a Sustainable Future, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA and the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, pp. 1203–1306.Google Scholar
  22. Riahi K, Grübler A, Nakicenovic N (2007) Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 74:887–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogelj J, McCollum DL, O’Neill BC, Riahi K (2013) 2020 emissions levels required to limit warming to below 2 C. Nat Clim Chang 3:405–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rose S, Kriegler E, Popp A (2013) Bioenergy in energy transformation and climate management. Climatic Change. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0965-3
  25. Skinner I, van Essen H, Smokers R, Hill N (2010) Towards the decarbonisation of EU’s transport sector by 2050. Final report produced under the contract ENV.C.3/SER/2008/0053 between European Commission Directorate-General Environment and AEA Technology plc; see www.eutransportghg2050.eu.
  26. Sugiyama M (2012) Climate change mitigation and electrification. Energy Policy 44:464–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tavoni M, Tol R (2010) Counting only the hits? The risk of underestimating the costs of stringent climate policy. Clim Chang 100:769–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Teske S, Pregger T, Simon S, Naegler T, O’Sullivan M, Schmid S, Pagenkopf J, Frieske B, Graus W, Kermeli K, Zittel W, Rutovitz J, Harris S, Ackermann T, Ruwahata R, Martensen N (2012) Energy [R]evolution: A sustainable world energy outlook, 4th ed. Greenpeace international, European Renewable Energy Council (EREC), Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC)Google Scholar
  29. Turton H (2006) Sustainable global automobile transport in the 21st century: An integrated scenario analysis. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 73:607–629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van Vliet O, Krey V, McCollum D, Pachauri S, Nagai Y, Rao S, Riahi K (2012) Synergies in the Asian energy system: Climate change, energy security, energy access and air pollution. Energy Economics.Google Scholar
  31. van Vuuren D, den Elzen M, Lucas P, Eickhout B, Strengers B, van Ruijven B, Wonink S, van Houdt R (2007) Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: An assessment of reduction strategies and costs. Clim Chang 81:119–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. WBCSD (2004) Mobility 2030: Meeting the challenges to sustainability. World business council for sustainable development.Google Scholar
  33. Williams JH, DeBenedictis A, Ghanadan R, Mahone A, Moore J, Morrow WR, Price S, Torn MS (2012) The technology path to deep greenhouse gas emissions cuts by 2050: The pivotal role of electricity. Science 335:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yang C, Ogden J, Sperling D, Hwang R (2011) California’s energy future: Transportation energy Use in California. California council on science and technology.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • David McCollum
    • 1
  • Volker Krey
    • 1
  • Peter Kolp
    • 1
  • Yu Nagai
    • 1
  • Keywan Riahi
    • 1
  1. 1.International Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisLaxenburgAustria

Personalised recommendations