Implications of uncertain future fossil energy resources on bioenergy use and terrestrial carbon emissions
- 598 Downloads
The magnitude and character of the global resource base of fossil fuels is a key determinant of the evolution of the future global energy system and corresponding fossil fuel carbon emissions. What is less well understood is the potential magnitude of impact of the availability of fossil fuels, due to the interaction with biomass energy, on agriculture, land use, ecosystems and therefore carbon emissions from land-use change. This paper explores these links and implications. We show that if oil resources are limited, then the consequently higher price for liquids induces both the use of coal-to-liquids technology deployment, but also enhanced production of bioenergy crops particularly in a business-as-usual scenario. This in turn implies greater pressure to convert unmanaged ecosystems to produce bioenergy, and higher rates of terrestrial carbon emissions from land use.
KeywordsFossil Fuel Carbon Emission Climate Policy Bioenergy Production Fossil Fuel Resource
The authors are grateful for research support provided by Stiftung Mercator (www.stiftung-mercator.de). The authors also wish to express appreciation to the Integrated Assessment Research Program in the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy for long-term support that enabled the development of the Global Change Assessment Model, which was used in the conduct of this research. This research also used Evergreen computing resources at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory’s Joint Global Change Research Institute at the University of Maryland in College Park, which is supported by DOE SC-IARP.
- Bruinsma J (2009) The resource outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water, and crop yields need to increase by 2050? Expert meeting on how to feed the world in 2050. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsGoogle Scholar
- Chum H, Faaij A, Moreira JR, Berndes G, Dharnija P, Dong H, Gabrielle B, Goss Eng A, Lucht W, Mapako M, Masera Cerutti O, McIntyre T, Minowa T, Pingoud K (2011) Bioenergy. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlomer S, von Stechow C (eds) IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- Clarke L, Kim SH, Edmonds JA, Dooley J (2007) Model Documentation for the MiniCAM Climate Change Science Program Stabilization Scenarios: CCSP Product 2.1a. PNNL Technical Report. PNNL-16735Google Scholar
- Edmonds J, Reilly J (1985) Global energy: assessing the future. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Havlik P, A S, Schmid E, Bottcher H, Fritz S, Skalsky R, Aoki K, de Cara S, Kindermann G, Kraxner F, Leduc S, McCallum L, Mosnier A, Sauer T, Obersteiner M (2011) Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy 39:5690–5702.Google Scholar
- Kim S, Edmonds J, Lurz J, Smith S, Wise M (2006) The ObjECTS: Framework for Integrated Assessment: Hybrid Modeling of Transportation. Journal Name: The Energy Journal, (Special Issue No. 2 2006):63Google Scholar
- Kriegler E, Mouratiadou I, Brecha R, Calvin K, de Cian E, Edmonds J, Jiang K, Luderer G, Tavoni M, Edenhofer O (2013) Will economic growth and fossil fuel scarcity help or hinder climate stabilization? Overview of the RoSE multi-model study. Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
- Monfreda C, Ramankutty N, Hertel T (2009) Global agricultural land use data for climate change analysis. In: Hertel T, Rose S, Tol R (eds) Economic analysis of land use in global climate change policy. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
- Nakicenovic N et al (2000) IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Wise M, Calvin K (2011) GCAM 3.0 Agriculture and land use: technical description of modeling approach. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WAGoogle Scholar