Climatic Change

, Volume 136, Issue 1, pp 57–68 | Cite as

Implications of uncertain future fossil energy resources on bioenergy use and terrestrial carbon emissions

  • Katherine Calvin
  • Marshall Wise
  • Patrick Luckow
  • Page Kyle
  • Leon Clarke
  • Jae Edmonds
Article

Abstract

The magnitude and character of the global resource base of fossil fuels is a key determinant of the evolution of the future global energy system and corresponding fossil fuel carbon emissions. What is less well understood is the potential magnitude of impact of the availability of fossil fuels, due to the interaction with biomass energy, on agriculture, land use, ecosystems and therefore carbon emissions from land-use change. This paper explores these links and implications. We show that if oil resources are limited, then the consequently higher price for liquids induces both the use of coal-to-liquids technology deployment, but also enhanced production of bioenergy crops particularly in a business-as-usual scenario. This in turn implies greater pressure to convert unmanaged ecosystems to produce bioenergy, and higher rates of terrestrial carbon emissions from land use.

Supplementary material

10584_2013_923_MOESM1_ESM.doc (147 kb)
Figure S1The High, Medium, and Low curves are the supply curves input into GCAM (labeled “Input”). The four BAU curves are the cumulative production/price mappings that result from the scenarios (labeled “Output”). Input costs and output prices differ due to the inclusion of transportation and other costs in the output price. (DOC 147 kb)
10584_2013_923_MOESM2_ESM.doc (64 kb)
Figure S2Total Global Fossil Fuel Production in the BAU Scenarios (DOC 64 kb)
10584_2013_923_MOESM3_ESM.doc (162 kb)
Figure S3Cropland and Bioenergy Land by Aggregate Region in the BAU Scenarios (DOC 162 kb)

References

  1. Bruinsma J (2009) The resource outlook to 2050: by how much do land, water, and crop yields need to increase by 2050? Expert meeting on how to feed the world in 2050. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsGoogle Scholar
  2. Chum H, Faaij A, Moreira JR, Berndes G, Dharnija P, Dong H, Gabrielle B, Goss Eng A, Lucht W, Mapako M, Masera Cerutti O, McIntyre T, Minowa T, Pingoud K (2011) Bioenergy. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Seyboth K, Matschoss P, Kadner S, Zwickel T, Eickemeier P, Hansen G, Schlomer S, von Stechow C (eds) IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke L, Kim SH, Edmonds JA, Dooley J (2007) Model Documentation for the MiniCAM Climate Change Science Program Stabilization Scenarios: CCSP Product 2.1a. PNNL Technical Report. PNNL-16735Google Scholar
  4. Edmonds J, Reilly J (1985) Global energy: assessing the future. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Havlik P, A S, Schmid E, Bottcher H, Fritz S, Skalsky R, Aoki K, de Cara S, Kindermann G, Kraxner F, Leduc S, McCallum L, Mosnier A, Sauer T, Obersteiner M (2011) Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets. Energy Policy 39:5690–5702.Google Scholar
  6. Kim S, Edmonds J, Lurz J, Smith S, Wise M (2006) The ObjECTS: Framework for Integrated Assessment: Hybrid Modeling of Transportation. Journal Name: The Energy Journal, (Special Issue No. 2 2006):63Google Scholar
  7. Kriegler E, Mouratiadou I, Brecha R, Calvin K, de Cian E, Edmonds J, Jiang K, Luderer G, Tavoni M, Edenhofer O (2013) Will economic growth and fossil fuel scarcity help or hinder climate stabilization? Overview of the RoSE multi-model study. Climatic ChangeGoogle Scholar
  8. Mellilo J, Reilly J, Kicklighter D, Gurgel A, Cronin T, Paltsev S, Felzer B, Wang X, Sokolov A, Schlosser A (2009) Indirect emissions from biofuels: How important? Science 326:1397–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Monfreda C, Ramankutty N, Hertel T (2009) Global agricultural land use data for climate change analysis. In: Hertel T, Rose S, Tol R (eds) Economic analysis of land use in global climate change policy. RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Nakicenovic N et al (2000) IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Popp A, Krause M, Dietrich JP, Lotze-Campen H, Leimbach M, Beringer T, Bauer N (2012) Additional CO2 Emissions from land use change - forest conservation as a precondition for sustainable production of second generation bioenergy. Ecol Econ 74:64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wise M, Calvin K (2011) GCAM 3.0 Agriculture and land use: technical description of modeling approach. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WAGoogle Scholar
  13. Wise M, Calvin K, Thomson A, Clarke L, Bond-Lamberty B, Sands R, Smith SJ, Janetos A, Edmonds J (2009) Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324:1183–1186CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katherine Calvin
    • 1
  • Marshall Wise
    • 1
  • Patrick Luckow
    • 2
  • Page Kyle
    • 1
  • Leon Clarke
    • 1
  • Jae Edmonds
    • 1
  1. 1.Joint Global Change Research InstitutePacific Northwest National LaboratoryCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.CambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations