Increased probability of fire during late Holocene droughts in northern New England
Understanding the role of fire in the Earth system, and particularly regional controls on its frequency and severity, is critical to risk assessment. Charcoal records from lake sediment and fire-scar networks from long-lived tree species have improved our understanding of long-term relationships between fire events and climate. This work has primarily focused on historically fire-prone ecosystems and regions. In the northeastern USA, where wildfire has been relatively infrequent in historical times, fire-risk assessments have incorporated little-to-no pre-historical data and little is known about long-term fire-climate relationships. We developed coupled, high-resolution records of moisture variability and fire from three ombrotrophic peatlands in Maine using testate amoebae and analysis of microscopic charcoal. Water-table depth reconstructions among the three sites were generally coherent, with high-magnitude dry and wet events corresponding within the uncertainty of age-depth models. At all sites, there was a significantly higher probability of fire events during high-magnitude droughts. However, although prolonged droughts were widespread and associated with higher probability of fire, the fire events were rarely synchronous among sites, with the exception of ~550 years before present (yr BP) when all three sites experienced both drought and fire. While fire has been relatively uncommon in the northeastern USA during the past century, our records clearly highlight the potential vulnerability of the region to future drought and fire impacts. Results also demonstrate the utility of coupled records of fire and climate in understanding regional fire-climate dynamics.
KeywordsFire Event Fire Occurrence Testate Amoeba Charcoal Fragment Ericaceous Shrub
This research was funded by the National Science Foundation Paleo Perspectives on Climate Change (EAR-0902441). J. Nichols generously provided samples and radiocarbon dates from Great Heath. A. Ireland, T. Andrews, K. LeBoeuf, and M. Spicer provided helpful discussions of the paper. The manuscript benefited from the reviews of G. Swindles and two anonymous reviewers.
- Amesbury MJ, Barber KE, Hughes PDM (2012) The relationship of fine-resolution, multi-proxy palaeoclimate records to meteorological data at Fågelmossen, Värmland, Sweden and the implications for the debate on climate drivers of the peat-based record. Quatern Int 268:77–86. doi: 10.1016/j.quaint.2011.05.027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Booth RK, Lamentowicz M, Charman DJ (2010) Preparation and analysis of testate amoebae in peatland paleoenvironmental studies. Mires Peat 7:1–7Google Scholar
- Bowman DMJS, Balch JK, Artaxo P, Bond WJ, Carlson JM, Cochrane MA, D’Antonio CM, DeFries RS, Doyle JC, Harrison SP, Johnston FH, Keeley JE, Krawchuk MA, Kull CA, Marston JB, Moritz MA, Prentice IC, Roos CI, Scott AC, Swetnam TW, van der Werf GR, Pyne SJ (2009) Fire in the Earth system. Science 324:481–484. doi: 10.1126/science.1163886 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bradshaw LS, Deeming JE, Burgan RE, Cohen JD (1984) The 1978 National Fire-Danger Rating System: technical documentation. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station General Tech. Rep. INT-169, pp 44Google Scholar
- French NHF, de Groot WJ, Jenkins LK, Rogers BM, Alvarado E, Amiro B, de Jong B, Goetz S, Hoy E, Hyer E, Keane R, Law BE, McKenzie D, McNulty SG, Ottmar R, Pérez–Salicrup DR, Randerson J, Robertson KM, Turetsky M (2011) Model comparisons for estimating carbon emissions from North American wildland fire. J Geophys Res 116:G00K05. doi: 10.1029/2010JG001469 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Frumhoff PC, McCarthy JJ, Melillo JM, Moser SC, Wuebbles DJ (2007) Confronting climate change in the U.S. Northeast: science, impacts, and solutions. Synthesis report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment (NECIA), Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
- Maine Forest Service (2010) Maine state forest assessment and strategies, Maine Forest Service, Department of Conservation. Augusta, Maine, pp 225Google Scholar
- Nichols JA, Huang Y (2012) Hydroclimate of the northeastern United States is highly sensitive to solar forcing. Geophysical Research Letters 39: L04707. doi: 10.1029/2011GL050720
- Power MJ et al (2008) Changes in fire regimes since the Last Glacial Maximum: an assessment based on global synthesis and analysis of charcoal data. Clim Chang 30:887–907Google Scholar
- Tweiten MA, Hotchkiss SC, Booth RK, Calcote RR, Lynch EA (2009) The response of a jack pine forest to late-Holocene climate variability in northwestern Wisconsin. The Holocene 19:1049–1061Google Scholar
- United States Forest Service (2010) Northeast Wildfire Risk Assessment. NWRA Steering Committee, Geospatial Working Group, pp 18Google Scholar
- van der Werf GR, Randerson JT, Giglio L, Collatz GJ, Mu M, Kasibhatla PS, Morton DC, DeFries RS, Jin Y, van Leeuwen TT (2010) Global fire emissions and the contribution of deforestation, savanna, forest, agricultural, and peat fires (1997–2009). Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 10:11707–11735. doi: 10.5194/acpd-10-16153-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar