Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 121, Issue 3, pp 513–525 | Cite as

Why geoengineering is not a ‘global public good’, and why it is ethically misleading to frame it as one

  • Stephen M. GardinerEmail author
Article

Abstract

In early policy work, climate engineering is often described as a global public good. This paper argues that the paradigm example of geoengineering—stratospheric sulfate injection (hereafter ‘SSI’)—does not fit the canonical technical definition of a global public good, and that more relaxed versions are unhelpful. More importantly, it claims that, regardless of the technicalities, the public good framing is seriously misleading, in part because it arbitrarily marginalizes ethical concerns. Both points suggest that more clarity is needed about the aims of geoengineering policy—and especially governance—and that this requires special attention to ethics.

Keywords

Public Good Political Legitimacy Global Public Good Pure Public Good Climate Engineering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for research support from the Environment Institute of the University of Washington College of the Environment, the Smith School for Energy and the Environment at Oxford University, the Netherlands Institute for Advanced Study in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NIAS), and the Center for Biological Futures (Prime Contract No. HHM 402-11-D-0017) at the University of Washington. He also thanks Simon Caney, Ben Gardiner, Lauren Hartzell Nichols, Clare Heyward, Dale Jamieson, Julian Savulescu, Henry Shue and two anonymous reviewers for their comments. The views expressed remain solely the responsibility of the author.

References

  1. Barrett S (2007) Why cooperate? The incentive to supply global public goods. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodansky D (2012) ‘What’s in a concept? Global public goods, international law, and legitimacy’ 23. Eur J Int LawGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldeira K (2012) Ethics of geoengineering (Food). Geoengineering Google group. April 12Google Scholar
  4. Carbone M (2007) Supporting or resisting global public goods? Glob Gov 13:179–198Google Scholar
  5. Gardiner SM (2011) A perfect moral storm. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Irvine PJ, Ridgwell A, Lunt DJ (2010) Assessing the regional disparities in geoengineering impacts. Geophys Res Lett 37Google Scholar
  7. Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern MA (eds) (1999) Global public goods. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Kaul I, Conceicao P (eds) (2006) The new public finance. OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Keith D (2000) Geoengineering: history and prospect. Annu Rev Energy Environ 25:245–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MacCracken M et al (2010) The Asilomar conference on principles for research into climate engineering techniques. Climate Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Nature (2012) A charter for geoengineering. Nature 485:415, EditorialGoogle Scholar
  12. Rayner S (2011) The challenges of geoengineering governance. In: RSIS Centre for Non-Traditional Security (NTS) studies, Pilot Workshop on Governing Geoengineering in the 21st Century: Asian Perspectives. Singapore. pp 10–11Google Scholar
  13. Rayner S, Redgwell C, Savulescu J, Pidgeon N, Kruger T (2009) Memorandum on draft principles for the conduct of geoengineering research. Available at http://www.geoengineering.ox.ac.uk/oxford-principles/history/
  14. Rayner S, Redgwell C, Savulescu J, Pidgeon N, Kruger T (2013) The Oxford principles. Clim ChangGoogle Scholar
  15. Ricke K, Granger Morgan M, Allen M (2010) Regional climate response to solar-radiation management. Nat Geosci 3:537–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Robock A, Oman L, Stenchikov GL (2008) Regional climate responses to geoengineering with tropical and Arctic SO2 injections. J Geophys Res 113:D16101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schmidt H et al (2012) Solar irradiance reduction to counteract radiative forcing from a quadrupling of CO2. Earth Syst Dyn 3:63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shepherd J et al (2009) Geoengineering the climate: Science, governance and uncertainty. Royal SocietyGoogle Scholar
  19. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the stern review. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Stiglitz J (2000) Economics of the public sector. NortonGoogle Scholar
  21. UK Government (2010) Government response to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee 5th report of session 2009–10: the regulation of geoengineering. The Stationary Office, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations