Climatic Change

, Volume 120, Issue 3, pp 517–530 | Cite as

Justice forward: Tribes, climate adaptation and responsibility

Article

Abstract

Federally-recognized tribes must adapt to many ecological challenges arising from climate change, from the effects of glacier retreat on the habitats of culturally significant species to how sea leave rise forces human communities to relocate. The governmental and social institutions supporting tribes in adapting to climate change are often constrained by political obstructions, raising concerns about justice. Beyond typical uses of justice, which call attention to violations of formal rights or to considerations about the degree to which some populations may have caused anthropogenic climate change, a justice framework should guide how leaders, scientists and professionals of all heritages and who work with or for federally-recognized tribes understand what actions are morally essential for supporting tribes’ adaptation efforts. This paper motivates a shift to a forward-looking framework of justice. The framework situates justice within the systems of responsibilities that matter to tribes and many others, which range from webs of inter-species relationships to government-to-government partnerships. Justice is achieved when these systems of responsibilities operate in ways that support the continued flourishing of tribal communities.

References

  1. (1941) Seminole Nation v. United States. U.S., p. 286Google Scholar
  2. Alessa L, Kliskey A, Williams P, Barton M (2008) Perception of change in freshwater in remote resource-dependent Arctic communities. Glob Environ Change-Human Policy Dimens 18:153–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alfred GR (1999) Peace, power, righteousness: An indigenous manifesto. Oxford University Press, Don MillsGoogle Scholar
  4. Anaya SJ (2004) Indigenous peoples in international law. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell K, De Melker S (2012) Northwest ‘Salmon People’ Face Future Without Fish. PBSGoogle Scholar
  6. Cochran P, Huntington OH, Pungowiyi C, Tom S, Chapin III FS, Huntington HP et al (2013) Indigenous frameworks for observing and responding to climate change in Alaska. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0735-2
  7. Cuomo CJ (2011) Climate change, vulnerability, and responsibility. Hypatia 26:690–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis L (ed) (2010) Alliances: Re/Envisioning Indigenous-Non-Indigenous Relationships. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  9. Dittmer K (2013) Changing streamflow on Columbia basin tribal lands- climate change and salmon. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0745-0
  10. Ebbin SA (2009) Institutional and ethical dimensions of resilience in fishing systems: perspectives from co-managed fisheries in the Pacific Northwest. Mar Policy 33:264–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Figueroa RM (2001) Other faces: Latinos and environmental justice. In: Lawson BE, Westra L (eds) Faces of environmental racism: Confronting issues of global justice. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Boston, pp 167–186Google Scholar
  12. Figueroa RM (2011) Indigenous peoples and cultural losses. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) The Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 232–250Google Scholar
  13. Frye M (1983) The politics of reality: Essays in feminist theory. Crossing Press, TrumansburgGoogle Scholar
  14. Gautam M, Chief K, Smith WJ Jr (2013) Climate change in Arid Lands and Native American socioeconomic vulnerability: the case of the Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0737-0
  15. Grah O, Beaulieu J (2013) The effect of climate change on glacier ablation and baseflow support in the Nooksack River Basin and implications on Pacific Salmon species protection and recovery. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0747-y
  16. Grossman Z (2008) Indigenous Nations’ Responses Climate Change Am Indian Cult Res J 32:5–27Google Scholar
  17. Harris G (ed.): (2011) Northwest Forest Plan - The First 15 Years [1994–2008]: Effectiveness of the Federal-Tribal Relationship, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  18. Holmes E, Lickers H, Barkley B (2002) A critical assessment of ten years of on-the-ground sustainable forestry in eastern Ontario s settled landscape. For Chron 78:643–647Google Scholar
  19. LaDuke W (1999) All our relations: Native struggles for land and life. South End Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Leonetti C (2010) Indigenous Stewardship Methods and NRCS Conservation Practices. United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Lynn K, MacKendrick K, Donoghue E (2011) Social vulnerability and climate change: Synthesis of literature. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, PortlandGoogle Scholar
  22. Lynn K, Daigle J, Hoffman J, Lake FK, Michelle N, Ranco D et al (2013) The impacts of climate change on tribal traditional foods. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0736-1
  23. Maldonado JK, Shearer C, Bronen R, Peterson K, Lazrus H (2013) The impact of climate change on tribal communities in the US: displacement, relocation, and human rights. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0746-z
  24. McGregor D (2008) Linking traditional ecological knowledge and Western science: aboriginal perspectives from the 2000 State of the Lakes Ecosystem Conference. Can J Nativ Stud XXVIII:139–158Google Scholar
  25. McGregor D (2009) Honouring our relations: An anishnaabe perspective on environmental justice. In: Agyeman J, Cole P, Haluza-Delay R (eds) Speaking for ourselves: Environmental justice in Canada. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, pp 27–41Google Scholar
  26. Mears J (2012) A Climate Change Focused Organization. First Stewards Symposium: Coastal Peoples Address Climate Change. First Stewards Symposium, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Merculieff L (2007) Native Perspectives on Sustainability: Larry Merculieff (Aleut) Native Perspectives on Sustainability. Interviewed by David HallGoogle Scholar
  28. Nelson DR, Adger WN, Brown K (2007) Adaptation to environmental change: contributions of a resilience framework. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:395–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nesper L (2002) The Walleye war: The struggle for Ojibwe spearfishing and treaty rights. University of Nebraska Press, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  30. Ortiz SJ, Chino M (1980) Fight Back: For the Sake of the People, for the Sake of the Land. [Albuquerque]: Institute for Native American Development, University of New MexicoGoogle Scholar
  31. Pardilla J (2011) Testimony on FY 2012 Appropriations House Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment & ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  32. Ranco D, O’Neill CA, Donatuto J, Harper BL (2011) Environmental justice, American Indians and the cultural dilemma: developing environmental management for tribal health and well-being. Environ Justice 4:221–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ross A, Sherman R, Snodgrass JG, Delcore HD (2010) Indigenous peoples and the collaborative stewardship of nature: Knowledge binds and institutional conflicts. Left Coast Press, Walnut CreekGoogle Scholar
  34. Runstrom A, Bruch R, Reiter D, Cox D (2002) Lake sturgeon (Acipenser fulvescens) on the Menominee Indian Reservation: an effort toward co-management and population restoration. J Appl Ichthyol 18:481–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schlosberg D, Carruthers D (2010) Indigenous struggles, environmental justice, and community capabilities. Global Environ Polit 10:12–35Google Scholar
  36. Shearer C (2011) Kivalina: A climate change story. Haymarket Books, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  37. Shearer C (2012) The social construction of Alaska native vulnerability to climate change. Race Gend Class 19:61–79Google Scholar
  38. Shockley K (2012) Human values and institutional responses to climate change. In: Thompson A, Bendik-Keymer J (eds) Ethical adaptation to climate change: Human virtues of the future. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 281–298Google Scholar
  39. Silvern SE (1999) Scales of justice: law, American Indian treaty rights and the political construction of scale. Polit Geogr 18:639–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Suagee D (2009) Tribal Sovereignty and the Green Energy Revolution. Indian Country TodayGoogle Scholar
  41. Tinker GE (2004) Spirit and resistance: Political theology and American Indian liberation. Fortress PrGoogle Scholar
  42. Trosper RL (2007) Indigenous influence on forest management on the Menominee Indian Reservation. For Ecol Manag 249:134–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Trosper RL (2009) Resilience, reciprocity and ecological economics: Northwest Coast sustainability. Routledge, New York, NY, USA Google Scholar
  44. Tsosie R (2010) Indigenous peoples and global climate change: intercultural models of climate equity. Environ Law Litig 25:7–18Google Scholar
  45. Tuana N (2013) Gendering Climate Knowledge for Justice: Catalyzing a New Research Agenda. in Alston M, Whittenbury K (eds.) Research, Action and Policy: Addressing the Gendered Impacts of Climate Change. Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 17–31Google Scholar
  46. Vennum T (1988) Wild rice and the Ojibway people. Minnesota historical society PressGoogle Scholar
  47. Voggesser G (2013) The tribal path forward: confronting climate change and conserving nature. Wildl Prof 4:24–30Google Scholar
  48. Voggesser G, Lynn K, Daigle J, Lake FK, Ranco D (2013) Cultural impacts to tribes from climate change influences on forests. Clim Chang. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0733-4
  49. Wildcat DR (2009) Red alert! saving the planet with indigenous knowledge. Fulcrum, GoldenGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilkinson CF (2005) Blood struggle: The rise of modern Indian nations. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Willow AJ (2011) Indigenizing invasive species management: native North Americans and the Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) Beetle. Cult Agric Food Environ 33:70–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Young OR, Agrawal A, King LA, Sand PH, Underdal A, Wasson M (1999) Institutional dimensions of global environmental change. Science Plan. IHDP, BonnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations