Climatic Change

, Volume 117, Issue 3, pp 515–530 | Cite as

The uncertainty about the social cost of carbon: A decomposition analysis using fund

  • David Anthoff
  • Richard S. J. TolEmail author


We report the results of an uncertainty decomposition analysis of the social cost of carbon as estimated by FUND, a model that has a more detailed representation of the economic impact of climate change than any other model. Some of the parameters particularly influence impacts in the short run whereas other parameters are important in the long run. Some parameters are influential in some regions only. Some parameters are known reasonably well, but others are not. Ethical values, such as the pure rate of time preference and the rate of risk aversion, therefore affect not only the social cost of carbon, but also the importance of the parameters that determine its value. Some parameters, however, are consistently important: cooling energy demand, migration, climate sensitivity, and agriculture. The last two are subject to a large research effort, but the first two are not.


Risk Aversion Social Cost Time Preference Climate Sensitivity Income Elasticity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Financial support by the CEC-DG RTD ClimateCost project is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Anthoff D, Tol RSJ (2010) On international equity weights and national decision making on climate change. J Environ Econ Manag 60(1):14–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthoff D, Tol RSJ (2012) Schelling’s conjecture on climate and development: A test, Chapter 14, pp 260–274, In: Hahn RW, Ulph AM (eds) Climate change and common sense: Essays in honour of Tom Schelling, Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Anthoff D, Hepburn CJ, Tol RSJ (2009a) Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecol Econ 68(3):836–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anthoff D, Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2009b) 'Discounting for Climate Change'. Economics -- the Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal 3(2009–24):1–24Google Scholar
  5. Anthoff D, Tol RSJ, Yohe GW (2009c) Risk Aversion, Time Preference, and the Social Cost of Carbon. Environ Res Lett 4(2–2):1–7Google Scholar
  6. Baker E (2005) Uncertainty and learning in a strategic environment: global climate change. Resource and Energy Economics 27:19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrios S, Bertinelli L, Strobl E (2006) Climatic change and rural–urban migration: The case of sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Urban Economics 60(3):357–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bates DC (2002) Environmental Refugees? Classifying Human Migrations Caused by Environmental Change. Popul Environ 23(5):465–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Batjes JJ, Goldewijk CGM (1994) The IMAGE 2 Hundred Year (1890–1990) Database of the Global Environment (HYDE) 410100082. RIVM, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
  10. Bessec M, Fouquau J (2008) The non-linear link between electricity consumption and temperature in Europe: A threshold panel approach. Energy Economics 30(5):2705–2721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blackorby C, Donaldson D (1984) Social Criteria for Evaluating Population Change. J Public Econ 25(1–2):13–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blackorby C, Bossert W, Donaldson D (2002) Rationalizable variable-population choice functions. Economic Theory 19(2):355–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Christenson M, Manz H, Gyalistras D (2006) Climate Warming Impact on Degree-Days and Building Energy Demand in Switzerland. Energy Conversion and Management 47:671–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cline WR (1992) Global Warming - The Benefits of Emission Abatement. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  15. Considine TJ (2000) The impacts of weather variations on energy demand and carbon emissions. Resource and Energy Economics 22:295–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cropper M, Hammitt JK, Robinson LA (2011) Valuing mortality risk reductions: Progress and challenges. Annual Review of Resource Economics 3:313–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fankhauser S (1994) Protection vs. Retreat – The Economic Costs of Sea Level Rise. Environment and Planning A 27:299–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fankhauser S, Tol RSJ, Pearce DW (1997) The Aggregation of Climate Change Damages: A Welfare Theoretic Approach. Environ Resour Econ 10(3):249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guo J, Hepburn CJ, Tol RSJ, Anthoff D (2006) Discounting and the Social Cost of Climate Change: A Closer Look at Uncertainty. Environmental Science & Policy 9:205–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hammitt JK, Lempert RJ, Schlesinger ME (1992) A Sequential-Decision Strategy for Abating Climate Change. Nature 357:315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hope CW (2006) The Marginal Impacts of CO2, CH4 and SF6 Emissions. Climate Policy 6(5):537–544Google Scholar
  22. Hope CW (2008) Discount rates, equity weights and the social cost of carbon. Energy Economics 30(3):1011–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kattenberg A, Giorgi F, Grassl H, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Stouffer RJ, Tokioka T, Weaver AJ, Wigley TML (1996) 'Climate Models - Projections of Future Climate. In: Houghton JT (ed) Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change -- Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 285–357Google Scholar
  24. Kuentzel WF, Ramaswamy VM (2005) Tourism and Amenity Migration - A Longitudinal Analysis. Ann Tour Res 32(2):419–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee CC, Chiu YB (2011) Electricity demand elasticities and temperature: Evidence from panel smooth transition regression with instrumental variable approach. Energy Economics 33(5):896–902CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leggett, J., W.J. Pepper, and R.J. Swart (1992), ‘Emissions Scenarios for the IPCC: An Update’, in Climate Change 1992 - The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, 1 edn, vol. 1J.T. Houghton, B.A. Callander, and S.K. Varney (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 71–95.Google Scholar
  27. Link PM, Tol RSJ (2004) Possible economic impacts of a shutdown of the thermohaline circulation: an application of FUND. Port Econ J 3(2):99–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Link PM, Tol RSJ (2011) The Economic Impact of a Shutdown of the Thermohaline Circulation: An Application of FUND. Clim Chang 104(2):287–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maier-Reimer E, Hasselmann K (1987) Transport and Storage of Carbon Dioxide in the Ocean: An Inorganic Ocean Circulation Carbon Cycle Model. Clim Dyn 2:63–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mansur ET, Mendelsohn RO, Morrison WN (2008) Climate change adaptation: A study of fuel choice and consumption in the US energy sector. J Environ Econ Manag 55(2):175–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendelsohn RO (2012) Development and climate adaptation. In: Hahn RW, Ulph AM (eds) Climate Change and Common Sense: Essays in Honour of Tom Schelling. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  32. Mendelsohn RO, Morrison WN, Schlesinger ME, Andronova NG (2000) Country-specific market impacts of climate change. Clim Chang 45(3–4):553–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moral-Carcedo J, Vicéns-Otero J (2005) Modelling the non-linear response of Spanish electricity demand to temperature variations. Energy Economics 27(3):477–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Narita D, Anthoff D, Tol RSJ (2009) Damage Costs of Climate Change through Intensification of Tropical Cyclone Activities: An Application of FUND. Clim Res 39:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Narita D, Anthoff D, Tol RSJ (2010) Economic Costs of Extratropical Storms under Climate Change: An Application of FUND. J Environ Plan Manag 53(3):371–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nordhaus WD (2008) A Question of Balance – Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  37. Nordhaus WD (2011) Estimates of the social cost of carbon: Background and results from the RICE-2011 Model, Discussion Paper 1826, Cowles Foundation, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  38. Nordhaus WD, Popp D (1997) What is the Value of Scientific Knowledge? An Application to Global Warming Using the PRICE Model. Energy Journal 18(1):1–45Google Scholar
  39. Peck SC, Teisberg TJ (1993) Global Warming Uncertainties and the Value of Information: An Analysis using CETA. Resource and Energy Economics 15:71–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ramaswamy V, Boucher O, Haigh J, Hauglustaine D, Haywood J, Myhre G, Nakajima T, Shi GY, Solomon S (2001) Radiative Forcing of Climate Change. In: Houghton JT, Ding Y (eds) Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis – Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 349–416Google Scholar
  41. Reuveny R (2007) Climate change-induced migration and violent conflict. Political Geography 26(6):656–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schroeder LD, Sjoquist DL, Stephan PE (1986) Understanding Regression Analysis. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  43. Tol RSJ (1995) The Damage Costs of Climate Change Toward More Comprehensive Calculations. Environ Resour Econ 5(4):353–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tol RSJ (1997) On the Optimal Control of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Application of FUND. Environ Model Assess 2:151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tol RSJ (2002a) Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change - Part 1: Benchmark Estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(1):47–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tol RSJ (2002b) Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change - Part II: Dynamic Estimates. Environ Resour Econ 21(2):135–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tol, R.S.J. (2006), ‘Multi-Gas Emission Reduction for Climate Change Policy: An Application of FUND’, Energy Journal (Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy Special Issue), 235–250.Google Scholar
  48. Tol RSJ (2009) The Economic Effects of Climate Change. J Econ Perspect 23(2):29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Natural Resources and EnvironmentUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of SussexEast SussexUK
  3. 3.Institute for Environmental StudiesVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Spatial EconomicsVrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations