Climatic Change

, Volume 118, Issue 3–4, pp 729–743 | Cite as

Does temperature contain a stochastic trend: linking statistical results to physical mechanisms

  • Robert K. Kaufmann
  • Heikki Kauppi
  • Michael L. Mann
  • James H. Stock
Article

Abstract

By construction, the time series for radiative forcing that are used to run the 20c3m experiments, which are implemented by climate models, impart non-stationary movements (either stochastic or deterministic) to the simulated time series for global surface temperature. Here, we determine whether stochastic or deterministic trends are present in the simulated time series for global surface temperature by examining the time series for radiative forcing. Statistical tests indicate that the forcings contain a stochastic trend against the alternative hypothesis that the series are trend stationary with a one-time structural change. This result is consistent with the economic processes that impart a stochastic trend to anthropogenic emissions and the physical processes that integrate emissions in the atmosphere. Furthermore, the stochastic trend in the aggregate measure of radiative forcing also is present in the simulated time series for global surface temperature, which is consistent with the relation between these two variables that is represented by a zero dimensional energy balance model. Finally, we propose that internal weather variability imposed on the stochastic trend in radiative forcings is responsible for statistical results, which gives the impression that global surface temperature is trend stationary with a one-time structural change. We conclude that using the ideas of stochastic trends, cointegration, and error correction can generate reliable conclusions regarding the causes of changes in global surface temperature during the instrumental temperature record.

References

  1. Archer DM, Eby V, Brovkin A, Ridgwell L, Cao U, Mikolajewicz K, Caldeira K, Matsumoto G, Munhoven AM, Tokos K (2009) Atmospheric lifetime of fossil fuel carbon dioxide. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 37:117–134. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.031208.100206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee A, Lumsdaine RL, Stock JH (1992) Recursive and sequential tests of the unit-root and trend-break hypotheses: theory and international evidence. J Bus Econ Stat 10(3):271–288Google Scholar
  3. Bloomfield P, Nychka D (1992) Climate spectra and detecting climate change. Climate Change 21:275–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crowley TJ (2000) Causes of climate change over the past 1000 years. Science 289:270–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431Google Scholar
  6. Dinda S, Coondoo D (2006) Income and emissions: panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecol Econ 57(2):167–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Estrada F, Gay C, Sanchez A (2010) Reply to “Does temperature contain a stochastic trend? Evaluating conflicting results by Kaufmann et al. Clim Chang 101(3–4):407–414. doi:10.1007//s10584-010-9928-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Estrada F, Perron P, Gay-Garcia C, Martinez-Lopez B (2011), A time-series analysis of the 20th century climate simulations produced for the IPCC’s AR4, http://ideas.repec.org/p/bos/wpaper/wp2011-051.html
  9. Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schulz M, Van Dorland R (2007) Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. Gay C, Estrada F, Sanchez A (2009) Global and hemispheric temperature revisited. Clim Chang 94:333–349. doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9524-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansen JE, Sato M (2001) Trends of measured climate forcing agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98:14778–14783. doi:10.1073/pnas.261553698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harvey LD, Kaufmann RK (2002) Simultaneously constraining climate sensitivity and aerosol radiative forcing. J Clim 15(20):2837–2861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Houghton RA (2008) Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes: 1850–2005. In TRENDS: A compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.AGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaufmann RK, Kauppi H, Stock JH (2006a) Emission, concentrations, & temperature: a time series analysis. Clim Chang 77:249–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaufmann RK, Kauppi H, Stock JH (2006b) The relationship between radiative forcing and temperature: what do statistical analyses of the instrumental temperature record measure? Clim Chang 77:279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaufmann RK, Kauppi H, Stock JH (2010) Does temperature contain a stochastic trend? Evaluating conflicting statistical results. Clim Chang 101:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaufmann RK, Kauppi H, Mann ML, Stock JH (2011) Reconciling anthropogenic climate change with observed temperature 1998–2008. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(29):11790–11793. doi:10.073/pnas.1102467108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaufmann RK, Stern DI (2002) Cointegration analysis of hemispheric temperature relations. J Geophys Res. 107 D2 10.1029, 2000JD000174Google Scholar
  19. King RG, Plosser CI, Stock JH, Watson MW (1991) Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 81(4):819–840Google Scholar
  20. Lean J (2004). Solar irradiance reconstruction. IGBP PAGES/World Data Center for Paleoclimatology Data Contribution Series # 2004–035. NOAA/NGDC Paleoclimatology Program, Boulder CO, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindzen RS, Giannitsis C (1998) On the climatic implications of volcanic cooling. J Geophys Res 103:5929–5941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lumsdaine RL and Papell DH (1997) Multiple trend breaks and the unit-root hypothesis, The Review of Economics and Statistics, pp 212–218Google Scholar
  23. Mann ME (2011) On long range temperature dependence in global surface temperature series. Clim Chang 107:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marland G, Boden TA, Andres RJ (2008) Global, regional, and national fossil fuel CO2 emissions. In Trends: A compendium of data on global change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A.Google Scholar
  25. Meehl GA, Stocker TF, Collins WD, Friedlingstein P, Gaye AT, Gregory JM, Kitoh A, Knutti R, Murphy JM, Noda A, Raper SCB, Watterson IG, Weaver AJ, Zhao Z-C (2007) Global climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. Mills TC (2009) How robust is the long-run relationship between temperature and radiative forcing? Clim Chang 94:351–361. doi:10.1007/S10584-008-9525-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Molina MJ, Rowland FS (1974) Stratospheric sink for chloroflouromethanes: chlorine atom-catalyzed destruction of ozone. Nature 249:810–812. doi:10.1038/249810a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nelson CR, Plosser CI (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: some evidence and implications. J Monetary Econ 10:139–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perron P (1997) Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. J Econometrics 80(2):355–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rea W, Reale M, Brown J (2011) Long memory in temperature reconstructions. Clim Chang 107:247–265. doi:10.1007/s10584-011-0068-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Said E, Dickey DA (1984) Testing for unit roots in autoregressive moving average models of unknown order. Biometrika 71:599–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sato M, Hansen JE, McCormick MP, Pollack JB (1993) Stratospheric aerosol optical depths, 1850–1990. J Geophys Res 98:22987–22994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stern DI, Kaufmann RK (1996) Estimates of global anthropogenic methane emissions 1860–1993. Chemosphere 33(1):159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stern DI, Kaufmann RK (2000) Is there a global warming signal in hemispheric temperature series: a structural time series approach. Clim Chang 47:411–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stock JH (1994) Unit roots, structural breaks, and trends, ch. 46. In: Engle R, McFadden D (eds) Handbook of econometrics, volume IV. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2740–2843Google Scholar
  36. Volk CM, Elkins JW, Fahey DW, Dutton GS, Gilligan JM, Loewenstein M, Podolske JR, Chan KR, Gunson MR (1997) Evaluation of source gas lifetimes from stratospheric observations. J Geophys Res-Atmos 102(D21):25543–25564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. West KD (1988) Asymptotic normality when regressors have a unit root. Econometrica 56:1397–1418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Woodward WA, Gray HL (1993) Global warming and the problem of testing for trend in time series data. J Clim 6:953–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woodward WA, Gray HL (1995) Selecting a model for detecting the presence of a trend. J Clim 8:1929–1937CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert K. Kaufmann
    • 1
  • Heikki Kauppi
    • 2
  • Michael L. Mann
    • 3
  • James H. Stock
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Earth and Environment, Center for Energy & Environmental StudiesBoston UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
  3. 3.Geography DepartmentGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations