Climatic Change

, Volume 118, Issue 2, pp 367–379 | Cite as

An economic approach to adaptation: illustrations from Europe

Article

Abstract

Policy makers are still struggling to find a rational and effective way to handle adaptation to climate change. This paper discusses a more strategic, economic approach to public adaptation and compares it with adaptation practice in Europe. An economic approach to adaptation involves setting priorities, both spatially (where to adapt) and inter-temporally (when to adapt). The paper reviews what we know about Europe’s geographic adaptation priorities. On inter-temporal priorities, it recommends fast-tracking two types of action: Win-win measures that yield an immediate return, such as water efficiency, and strategic decisions on infrastructure and spatial planning that have long-term consequences for Europe’s vulnerability profile. An economic approach to adaptation involves careful project design to ensure adaptation measures are cost-effective and flexible in the light of climate uncertainty (how to adapt). The final element of an economic approach to adaptation is the division of labour between the state and private actors (who should adapt). The paper argues that the traditional functions of the state—the provision of public goods, creation of an enabling environment and protection of the vulnerable—also apply to adaptation.

References

  1. Agrawala S, Fankhauser S (2008) Economic aspects of adaptation to climate change. Costs, benefits and policy instruments. OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  2. ASC (2010) How well prepared is the UK for climate change? UK Adaptation Sub-Committee, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. ASC (2011) Adapting to climate change in the UK. Measuring progress. UK Adaptation Sub-Committee, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. ASC (2012) Climate change. Is the UK preparing for flooding and water scarcity. UK Adaptation Sub-Committee, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bowen A, Cochrane S, Fankhauser S (2012) Climate change, adaptation and growth. Clim Chang 113(2):95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter T, Parry M, Harasawa H, Nishioka S (1994) IPCC technical guidelines for assessing change impacts and adaptations. Department of Geography, University College London, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter T et al (2007) New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Parry M et al (eds) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Cimato F, Mullan M (2010) Adapting to Climate Change: Analysing the Role of Government, Defra Evidence and Analysis Series, Paper 1, UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  9. Ciscar JC (2011) The impacts of climate change in Europe (the PESETA research project). Clim Chang 112(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corfee-Morlot J, Cochran I, Teasdale JP, Hallegatte S (2011) Multilevel risk governance and urban adaptation policy. Clim Chang 104(1):169–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. DEFRA (2012a) Climate Change Risk Assessment. UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  12. DEFRA (2012b) Climate Ready: Co-creation progress update and an invitation to respond. UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, JulyGoogle Scholar
  13. Deltacommissie (2008) Working together with water: findings of the DeltacommissieGoogle Scholar
  14. Dessai S, Hulme M (2007) Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: a case study on water resources management in the East of England. Glob Environ Chang 17(1):59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ecologic, Institute for International and European Environmental Policy (2007) EU water saving potential (Part 1—Report, Part 2—Case Studies): final report. JulyGoogle Scholar
  16. EEA (2008) Impacts of Europe’s Changing Climate. 2008 Indicator-based Assessment, EEA Report 4/2008, European Environment AgencyGoogle Scholar
  17. Environment Agency (2009) Managing flood risk with a long-term contract. Flood and Coastal Risk Management Case Studies, JuneGoogle Scholar
  18. ESPON (2011) Climate change and territorial effects on regions and local economies: Final report. European Spatial Planning Observation Network, MayGoogle Scholar
  19. European Commission (2007) Accompanying Document to the Communication of the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee on the Regions on Limiting Global Climate Change to 2 degrees Celsius, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  20. European Mortgage Federation (2010) HYPOSTAT 2010: a review of Europe’s mortgage and housing marketsGoogle Scholar
  21. Fankhauser S (2010) The costs of adaptation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1(1):23–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fankhauser S, Smith JB, Tol R (1999) Weathering climate change. Some simple rules to guide adaptation investments. Ecol Econ 30(1):67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Field C et al (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation a special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. CUP, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fothergill A, Peek L (2004) Poverty and disasters in the United States: a review of recent sociological findings. Nat Hazard 32(1):89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Füssel M (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Chang 17:155–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Füssel M, Klein R (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Chang 75(3):301–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Chang 15(3):199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hallegatte S, Lecocq F, de Perthuis C (2011a) Designing Climate Change Adaptation Policies. An Economic Framework. Policy Research Working Paper 5568, World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  29. Hallegatte S, Henriet F, Corfee-Morlot J (2011b) The economics of climate change impacts and policy benefits at city scale. Clim Chang 104(1):51–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hanemann M (2008) Observations on the Economics of Adaptation: Uncertainty and Timing, Presentation at the OECD Workshop on the Economics of Adaptation, Paris, AprilGoogle Scholar
  31. Jenkins G, Murphy J, Sexton D, Lowe J, Jones P, Kilsby C (2010) UK Climate Projections: Briefing Report. Version 2. Met Office Hadley Centre, DecemberGoogle Scholar
  32. McKenzie-Hedger M, Connell R, Bramwell P (2006) Bridging the gap: empowering decision-making for adaptation through the UK Climate Impacts Programme. Clim Pol 6(2):201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Parry M, Carter T (1998) Climate impact and adaptation assessment: A guide to the IPCC approach. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Parry M et al (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Pascal M et al (2006) France’s heat health watch warning system. Int J Biometeorol 50:144–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ranger N et al (2010) Adaptation in the UK: A Decision Making Process. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  37. Reeder T, Ranger N (2010) How do you adapt in an uncertain world? Lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 project. Grantham Research Institute, London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  38. Repetto R (2008) The Climate Crisis and the Adaptation Myth. Working Paper 13. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesGoogle Scholar
  39. Schröter D et al (2005) Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310:1333–1337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sobel R, Leeson P (2006) Government’s Response to Hurricane Katrina: a public choice analysis. Public Choice 127(1):55–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stainforth D, Allen MR, Tredger ER, Smith LA (2007) Confidence, uncertainty and decision-support relevance in climate predictions. Phil Trans R Soc 365:2145–2161. doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2074 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Subak S (2000) Climate change adaptation in the U.K. Water industry: managers’ perceptions of past variability and future scenarios. Water Resour Manag 14(2):137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Surminski S, Oramas-Dorta D (2011) Building effective and sustainable risk transfer initiatives in low- and middle-income economies: what can we learn from existing insurance schemes? Policy paper, Grantham Research Institute and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of EconomicsGoogle Scholar
  44. Swart R et al (2009) Europe adapts to climate change: Comparing National Adaptation Strategies. PEER Report No 1 Helsinki: Partnership for European Environmental ResearchGoogle Scholar
  45. Swiss Re (2009) Shaping Climate Resilient Development, Economics of Adaptation Working Group, http://www.swissre.com/rethinking/climate/shaping_climate_resilient_development.html
  46. Tol R (2008) The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes. Economics (e-Journal) 2 (2008–25), AugustGoogle Scholar
  47. Tol R, Yohe G (2007) The weakest link hypothesis for adaptive capacity: an empirical test. Glob Environ Chang 17:218–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Grantham Research Institute and Centre for Climate Change Economics and PolicyLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
  2. 2.Vivid EconomicsLondonUK

Personalised recommendations