Climatic Change

, Volume 117, Issue 1–2, pp 55–67 | Cite as

On the simulation of Laurentian Great Lakes water levels under projections of global climate change

  • Murray MacKayEmail author
  • Frank Seglenieks


A new method is proposed to estimate future net basin supplies and lake levels for the Laurentian Great Lakes based on GCM projections of global climate change. The method first dynamically downscales the GCM simulation with a regional climate model, and then bias—corrects the simulated net basin supply in order to be used directly in a river—routing/lake level scheme. This technique addresses two weaknesses in the traditional approach, whereby observed sequences of climate variables are perturbed with fixed ratios or differences derived directly from GCMs in order to run evaporation and runoff models. Specifically, (1) land surface—atmosphere feedback processes are represented, and (2) changes in variability can be analyzed with the new approach.

The method is demonstrated with a single, high resolution simulation, where small changes in future mean lake levels for all the upper Great Lakes are found, and an increase in seasonal range—especially for Lake Superior—is indicated. Analysis of a small ensemble of eight lower resolution regional climate model simulations supports these findings. In addition, a direct comparison with the traditional approach based on the same GCM projections used as the driving simulations in this ensemble shows that the new method indicates smaller declines in level for all the upper Great Lakes than has been reported previously based on the traditional method, though median differences are only a few centimetres in each case.


Great Lake Regional Climate Model Lake Level Great Lake Region Climate Period 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The CRCM4.2.3 data has been generated and supplied by Ouranos. We would also like to thank the Canadian Center for Climate Modelling and Analysis for providing the CGCM3 archives. Jim Angel is kindly acknowledged for providing the data from Angel and Kunkel 2010. Funding for this research was provided by the International Upper Great Lakes Study.


  1. Angel JR, Kunkel KE (2010) The response of Great Lakes water levels to future climate scenarios with an emphasis on Lake Michigan – Huron. J Great Lakes Res 36:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caya D, Laprise R (1999) A semi-implicit, semi-Lagrangian regional climate model: the Canadian RCM. Mon Weather Rev 127:341–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chao P (1999) Great Lakes water resources: climate change impact analysis with transient GCM scenarios. J Amer Wat Res Assoc 35(6):1499–1507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clites AH, Lee DE (1998) MIDLAKES: A Coordinated Hydrologic Response Model for the Middle Great Lakes. NOAA Technical Memorandum ERL GLERL-109. Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, Ann Arbor, p 48Google Scholar
  5. Cohen SJ (1986) Impacts of CO2—induced climatic change on water resources in the Great Lakes basin. Clim Change 8:135–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croley TE II (1983a) Great Lakes basin (U.S.A.-Canada) runoff modeling. J Hydrology 64:135–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Croley TE II (1983b) Lake Ontario basin (U.S.A.-Canada) runoff modeling. J Hydrology 66:101–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Croley TE II (1989) Verifiable evaporation modeling on the Laurentian Great Lakes. Wat Resour Res 25(5):781–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Croley TE II (1990) Laurentian Great Lakes double—CO2 climate change hydrological impacts. Clim Change 17:27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Croley TE II (2003) Great Lakes climate change hydrologic impact assessment. I.J.C. Lake Ontario—St. Lawrence River Regulation Study. NOAA Technical Memorandum GLERL – 126Google Scholar
  11. Hagedorn R, Doblas-Reyes FJ, Palmer TN (2005) The rationale behind the success of multi—model ensembles in seasonal forecasting—I. Basic concept. Tellus 57A:219–233Google Scholar
  12. Hartmann HC (1990) Climate change impacts on Laurentian Great Lakes levels. Clim Change 17:49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K (Eds) (1996) Climate Change 1995: the science of climate change. Contribution of WGI to the second assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 584Google Scholar
  14. International Upper Great Lakes Study (2009) Impacts on upper Great Lakes water levels: St. Clair River. Final report to the International Joint Commission, December 2009Google Scholar
  15. Jungclaus JH, Keenlyside N, Botzet M, Haak H, Luo J-J, Latif M, Marotzke J, Mikolajewicz U, Roeckner E (2006) Ocean circulation and tropical variability in the AOGCM ECHAM5/MPI-OM. J Clim 19:3952–3972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kristovich DAR et al (2000) The lake induced convection experiment and the snowband dynamics project. Bull Amer Met Soc 81:519–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lettenmaier DP, Gan TY (1990) Hydrologic sensitivities of the Sacramento—San Joaquin River basin, California, to global warming. Wat Resour Res 26(1):69–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leung LR, Qian Y, Bian X, Washington WM, Han J, Roads JO (2004) Mid-century ensemble regional climate change scenarios for the western United States. Clim Change 62:75–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lofgren BM, Quinn FH, Clites AH, Assel RA, Eberhardt AJ, Luukkonen CL (2002) Evaluation of potential impacts on Great Lakes water resources based on climate scenarios of two GCMs. J Great Lakes Res 28(4):537–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lofgren BM, Hunter TS, Wilbarger J (2011) Effects of using air temperature as a proxy for potential evapotranspiration in climate change scenarios of Great Lakes basin hydrology. J Great Lakes Res 37:744–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacKay M, Bartlett P, Chan E, Verseghy D, Soulis ED, Seglenieks FR (2008) The MAGS regional climate modeling system: CRCM-MAGS. IN Cold Region Atmospheric and Hydrologic Studies, the Mackenzie GEWEX Experience, Vol 1: Atmospheric Dynamics, 433–450, Ming-ko Woo ed., Springer, pp. 470Google Scholar
  22. Marchand D, Sanderson M, Howe D, Alpaugh C (1988) Climatic change and Great Lakes levels: the impact on shipping. Clim Change 12:107–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mortsch LD, Quinn FH (1996) Climate change scenarios for Great Lakes basin ecosystem studies. Limnol Oceanogr 41(5):903–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mortsch LD, Ingram J, Hebb A, Doka S (eds) (2006) Great Lakes coastal wetlands communities: vulnerabilities to climate change and response to adaptation strategies. Final report submitted to the Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Programme, Natural Resources CanadaGoogle Scholar
  25. Quinn FH (1978) Hydrologic response model of the North American Great Lakes. J Hydrology 37:295–307Google Scholar
  26. Salas-Melia D, Chauvin F, Deque M, Douville H, Gueremy J-F, Planton S, Royer J-F, Tyteca S (2005) Description and validation of the CNRM-CM3 global coupled model. CNRM Tech Rep 103Google Scholar
  27. Scinocca JF, McFarlane NA, Lazare M, Li J, Plummer D (2008) The CCCma third generation AGCM and its extension into the middle atmosphere. Atmos Chem Phys Discuss 8:7883–7930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott RW, Huff FA (1996) Impacts of the Great Lakes on regional climate conditions. J Great Lakes Res 22:845–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds.) (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA,pp. 996Google Scholar
  30. Tebaldi C, Knutti R (2007) The use of the multi—model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Phil Trans R Soc A 365:2053–2075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989) The potential effects of global climate change on the United States. Report to Congress. Smith JB and Tirpak DA (Eds) Report EPA-230-05-89-050, EPA Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  32. Wilcock D, Wilcock F (1995) Modelling the hydrological impacts of channelization on streamflow characteristics in a Northern Ireland Catchment in Modelling and Management of Sustainable Basin-scale Water Resource Systems (Proceedings of a Boulder Symposium, July 1995). IAHS Publ. no. 231Google Scholar
  33. Wittenberg H (1994) Nonlinear analysis of flow recession curves. Flow Regimes from International Experimental and Network Data (Proceedings of the Braunschweig Conference, October 1993). IAHS Publ. no. 221Google Scholar
  34. Wood AW, Leung LR, Sridhar V, Lettenmaier DP (2004) Hydrological implications of dynamical and statistical approaches to downscaling climate model outputs. Clim Change 62:189–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Crown Copyright (Canada) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environment CanadaClimate Research DivisionTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations