Climatic Change

, Volume 117, Issue 1–2, pp 289–303

Tracking suitable habitat for tree populations under climate change in western North America

Article

Abstract

An important criticism of bioclimate envelope models is that many wide-ranging species consist of locally adapted populations that may all lag behind their optimal climate habitat under climate change, and thus should be modeled separately. Here, we apply a bioclimate envelope model that tracks habitat of individual populations to estimate adaptational lags for 15 wide-ranging forest tree species in western North America. An ensemble classifier modeling approach (RandomForest) was used to spatially project the climate space of tree populations under observed climate trends (1970s to 2000s) and multi-model projections for the 2020s, 2050s and 2080s. We find that, on average, populations already lag behind their optimal climate niche by approximately 130 km in latitude, or 60 m in elevation. For the 2020s we expect an average lag of approximately 310 km in latitude or 140 m in elevation, with the most pronounced geographic lags in the Rocky Mountains and the boreal forest. We show that our results could in principle be applied to guide assisted migration of planting stock in reforestation programs using a general formula where 100 km north shift is equivalent to approximately 44 m upward shift in elevation. However, additional non-climatic factors should be considered when matching reforestation stock to suitable planting environments.

Supplementary material

10584_2012_548_MOESM10_ESM.pdf (1.5 mb)
ESM 1(PDF 1575 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM11_ESM.pdf (889 kb)
ESM 2(PDF 889 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM12_ESM.pdf (1.4 mb)
ESM 3(PDF 1410 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM13_ESM.pdf (977 kb)
ESM 4(PDF 976 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM14_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
ESM 5(PDF 1652 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM15_ESM.pdf (858 kb)
ESM 6(PDF 857 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
ESM 7(PDF 1591 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (2.1 mb)
ESM 8(PDF 2157 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
ESM 9(PDF 1688 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM4_ESM.pdf (2.2 mb)
ESM 10(PDF 2225 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM5_ESM.pdf (1.1 mb)
ESM 11(PDF 1090 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM6_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
ESM 12(PDF 1670 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM7_ESM.pdf (1000 kb)
ESM 13(PDF 1000 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM8_ESM.pdf (990 kb)
ESM 14(PDF 989 kb)
10584_2012_548_MOESM9_ESM.pdf (2.1 mb)
ESM 15(PDF 2173 kb)

References

  1. Allen CD, Macalady AK, Chenchouni H, Bachelet D, McDowell N, Vennetier M, Kitzberger T, Rigling A, Breshears DD, Hogg EH, Gonzalez P, Fensham R, Zhang Z, Castro J, Demidova N, Lim JH, Allard G, Running SW, Semerci A, Cobb N (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecol Manage 259(4):660–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber VA, Juday GP, Finney BP (2000) Reduced growth of Alaskan white spruce in the twentieth century from temperature-induced drought stress. Nature 405(6787):668–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechtold WA, Patterson PL (2005) The enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis program- a national sampling design and estimation procedures. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report, SRS-80, Ashville, NCGoogle Scholar
  4. Black RA, Bliss LC (1980) Reproductive ecology of Picea mariana (Mill.)BSP., at tree line near Inuvik, Northwest Territories, Canada. Ecol Monogr 50:331–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Botkin DB, Saxe H, Araujo MB, Betts R, Bradshaw RHW, Cedhagen T, Chesson P, Dawson TP, Etterson JR, Faith DP, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hansen AS, Hilbert DW, Loehle C, Margules C, New M, Sobel MJ, Stockwell DRB (2007) Forecasting the effects of global warming on biodiversity. BioScience 57(3):227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45(1):5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen P, Welsh C, Hamann A (2010) Geographic variation in growth response of Douglas-fir to interannual climate variability and projected climate change. Glob Chang Biol 16(12):3374–3385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cutler DR, Edwards TC, Beard KH, Cutler A, Hess KT (2007) Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88(11):2783–2792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daly C, Halbleib M, Smith JI, Gibson WP, Doggett MK, Taylor GH, Curtis J, Pasteris PP (2008) Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int J Climatol 28(15):2031–2064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis MB, Shaw RG (2001) Range shifts and adaptive responses to Quaternary climate change. Science 292(5517):673–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donovan LA, McLeod KW, Sherrod KCJ, Stumpff NJ (1988) Response of woody swamp seedlings to flooding and increased water temperatues (I) Growth, biomass, and survivorship. Am J Bot 75:1181–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. EPA (2007) Ecoregion maps and GIS resources. U.S. Environmental protection agency, western ecology division official website, Available online at: http://www.epa.gov/wed, accessed 10 May 2008, Corvallis, OR
  13. Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 27(8):861–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24(1):38–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (eds) (1993+) Flora of North America of Mexico. 15 vols., New York and OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray LK, Gylander T, Mbogga M, Chen P, Hamann A (2011) Assisted migration to address climate change: recommendations for aspen reforestation in western Canada. Ecol Appl 21:1591–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol Model 135(2–3):147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hamann A, Wang T (2005) Models of climatic normals for genecology and climate change studies in British Columbia. Agric For Meteorol 128(3–4):211–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamann A, Wang T (2006) Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 87(11):2773–2786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamann A, Gylander T, Chen P (2011) Developing seed zones and transfer guidelines with multivariate regression trees. Tree Genetics & Genomes 7:399–408Google Scholar
  21. Hamann A, Smets P, Yanchuk AD, Aitken SN (2005) An ecogeographic framework for in situ conservation of forest trees in British Columbia. Can J For Res 35:2553–2561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hampe A (2004) Bioclimate envelope models: what they detect and what they hide. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12(5):469–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hennon P, D’Amore D, Wittwer D, Johnson A, Schaberg P, Hawley G, Beier C, Sink S, Juday G (2006) Climate warming, reduced snow, and freezing injury could explain the demise of yellow-cedar in southeast Alaska, USA. World Resource Review 18(2):427–450Google Scholar
  24. Hogg EH (1997) Temporal scaling of moisture and the forest-grassland boundary in western Canada. Agric For Meteorol 84(1–2):115–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matyas C (1990) Adaptational lag: a general feature of natural populations. In: Joint meeting of the Western Forest Genetics Association and IUFRO Working Parties, Douglas-fir, Contorta Pine, Sitka Spruce and Abies Breeding and Genetic Resources, 20–24 August, Olympia, Washington, 11ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Mbogga MS, Hamann A, Wang T (2009) Historical and projected climate data for natural resource management in western Canada. Agric For Meteorol 149(5):881–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mbogga MS, Wang XL, Hamann A (2010) Bioclimate envelope model predictions for natural resource management: dealing with uncertainty. J Appl Ecol 47(4):731–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McDowell NG, Allen CD, Marshall L (2010) Growth, carbon-isotope discrimination, and drought-associated mortality across a Pinus ponderosa elevational transect. Glob Chang Biol 16(1):399–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meidinger D, Pojar J (1991) Ecosystems of British Columbia. Special report series 6. Research Branch, BC Ministry of Forests and Ranges, Victoria, ISBN 0843-6452Google Scholar
  30. Michaelian M, Hogg EH, Hall RJ, Arsenault E (2010) Massive mortality of aspen following severe drought along the southern edge of the Canadian boreal forest. Glob Chang Biol 17:2084–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol Appl 17(8):2145–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morgenstern E (1996) Geographic variation in forest trees. Genetic basis and application of knowledge in silviculture. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, p 208Google Scholar
  33. NRC (2006) Natural regions and subregions of Alberta. Natural Regions Committee, Government of Alberta, Alberta Environment, Edmonton. ISBN 0-7785-4572-5Google Scholar
  34. O’Neill GA, Hamann A, Wang TL (2008) Accounting for population variation improves estimates of the impact of climate change on species' growth and distribution. J Appl Ecol 45(4):1040–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Overpeck JT, Bartlein PJ, Webb T (1991) Potential magnitude of future vegetation change in eastern North-America—comparisons with the past. Science 254(5032):692–695CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Peng CH, Ma ZH, Lei XD (2011) A drought-induced pervasive increase in tree mortality across Canada’s boreal forests. Nat Clim Chang 1:467–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. ISBN 3-900051-07-0Google Scholar
  38. Rehfeldt GE, Ferguson DE, Crookston NL (2009) Aspen, climate, and sudden decline in western USA. Forest Ecol Manage 258(11):2353–2364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roberts DR, Hamann A (2012) Method selection for species distribution modelling: are temporally or spatially independent evaluations necessary? Ecography 35:792–802Google Scholar
  40. Schroeder TA, Hamann A, Wang T, Coops NC (2010) Occurrence and dominance of six Pacific Northwest conifer species. J Veg Sci 21(3):586–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Selby CJ, Santry MJ (1996) A national ecological framework for Canada: data model, database and programs. Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research, Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada and State of the Environment Directorate, Environment Canada, Ottawa. ISBN 0-662-24107-XGoogle Scholar
  42. Sing T, Sander O, Beerenwinkel N, Lengauer T (2005) ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics 21(20):3940–3941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Green RE, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, Ferreira de Slquelra M, Grainger A, Hannah L, Huges L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinciton risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thuiller W, Albert C, Araujo MB, Berry PM, Cabeza M, Guisan A, Hickler T, Midgely GF, Paterson J, Schurr FM, Sykes MT, Zimmermann NE (2008) Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: future challenges. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9(3–4):137–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse DL, Aitken SN (2006a) Development of scale-free climate data for western Canada for use in resource management. Int J Climatol 26(3):383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang T, Hamann A, Yanchuk A, O’Neill GA, Aitken SN (2006b) Use of response functions in selecting lodgepole pine populations for future climates. Glob Chang Biol 12(12):2404–2416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wang T, O’Neill GA, Aitken SN (2010) Integrating environmental and genetic effects to predict responses of tree populations to climate. Ecol Appl 20(1):153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse DL, Murdock TQ (2012) ClimateWNA—high-resolution spatial climate data for western North America. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 51:16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Woods A, Coates KD, Hamann A (2005) Is an unprecedented dothistroma needle blight epidemic related to climate change? Bioscience 55(9):761–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ying CC, Yanchuk AD (2006) The development of British Columbia’s tree seed transfer guidelines: purpose, concept, methodology, and implementation. Forest Ecol Manage 227(1–2):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Renewable ResourcesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations