Climatic Change

, Volume 117, Issue 1–2, pp 345–361 | Cite as

Climate change adaptation advantage for African road infrastructure

  • Paul Chinowsky
  • Amy Schweikert
  • Niko Strzepek
  • Kyle Manahan
  • Kenneth Strzepek
  • C. Adam Schlosser
Article

Abstract

The African continent is facing the potential of a $183.6 billion USD liability to repair and maintain roads damaged from temperature and precipitation changes directly related to predicted climate change through 2100. This cost is strictly to retain the current road inventory. This cost does not include costs associated with impacts to critically needed new roads. In many African countries, limited or non-existent funds for adaptation and mitigation are challenging these countries to identify the threats that are posed by climate change, develop adaptation approaches to the predicted changes, incorporate changes into mid-range and long-term development plans, and secure funding for the proposed and necessary adaptations. Existing studies have attempted to quantify the impact of climate change on infrastructure assets that will be affected by climate change in the coming decades. The current study extends these efforts by specifically addressing the effect of climate change on the African road infrastructure. The study identifies both total costs and opportunity costs of repairing and maintaining infrastructure due to increased stressors from climate change. Proactive and reactive costs are examined for six climate scenarios, with costs ranging, respectively, from an average of $22 million USD to $54 million USD annually per country. A regional analysis shows contrast between impacts in five areas of the continent, with impacts ranging from 22 % opportunity cost to 168 %. These costs have the potential to delay critical infrastructure development on the continent and present a challenge to policy makers balancing short-term needs with long-term planning.

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research is partly funded by a grant from the University of Copenhagen. The authors also recognize the World Bank for supporting the initial work in that enabled the final comparison study. The authors acknowledge the modeling groups, the Program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison (PCMDI) and the WCRP’s Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM) for their roles in making available the WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset. Support of this dataset is provided by the Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy. Finally, the authors acknowledge Xiang Guo, David Johnson and William Farmer JP, for data analysis.

Supplementary material

10584_2012_536_MOESM1_ESM.docx (34 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 34 kb)

References

  1. AUSTROADS (2004) Impact of climate change on road infrastructure, Austroads Publication No. AP–R243/04, Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  2. CCSP (2006) Effects of climate change on energy production and use in the United States. US Climate Change Science Program, Department of Energy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Chinowsky PS, Hayles C, Schweikert A and, Strzepek N (2011) “Climate change as organizational challenge: comparative impact on developing and developed countries.” Eng Proj Organ JGoogle Scholar
  4. Galbraith RM, Price DJ, and Shackman L (2005) Scottish road network climate change study, Scottish ExecutiveGoogle Scholar
  5. Gwilliam K, Foster V, Archondo-Callao R, Briceño-Garmendia C, Nogales A, and Kavita S (2008) Africa infrastructure country diagnostic: roads in Sub-Saharan Africa, Summary of Background Paper 14, World BankGoogle Scholar
  6. Industrial Economics (2010) Costing climate impacts and adaptation: a Canadian study on public infrastructure, prepared for: National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy, Industrial Economics, Inc.Google Scholar
  7. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K and Reisinger, A. (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 ppGoogle Scholar
  8. IRF (2009) World road statistics 2009. International Road Federation, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaberuka D (2009) “Kaberuka: Africa needs USD 40 Billion/Year in Climate Aid”. African Development Bank Group, 12/02/2009. http://www.afdb.org/en/news-events/article/climate-change-conference-an-opportunity-for-africa-6671/
  10. Khandker SR, Koolwal GB (2010) How infrastructure and financial institutions affect rural income and poverty: evidence from Bangladesh. J Dev Stud 46(6):1109–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Larsen PH, Goldsmith S, Smith O, Wilson M, Strzepek K, Chinowsky P, Saylor B (2008) Estimating the future costs of Alaska public infrastructure at risk from climate change. Glob Environ Chang 18(3):442–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lohmann U, Sausen R, Bengtsson L, Cubasch U, Perlwitz J, Roeckner E (1993) The K¨oppen climate classification as a diagnostic tool for general circulation models. Clim Res 3:177–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meehl GA, Covey C, Delworth T, Latif M, McAvaney B, Mitchell JFB, Stouffer RJ, Taylor KE (2007) The WCRP CMIP3 multi-model dataset: a new era in climate change research. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 88:1383–1394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mills B and Andrey J (2002) “Climate change and transportation: potential interactions and impacts.” In: The potential impacts of climate change on transportation: workshop summary, U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Workshop, 1–2 October, http://climate.volpe.dot.gov/workshop1002/.
  15. Mutume G (2002) Building an efficient road network: public-private partnerships hold the key to regional infrastructure. Africa Recovery 16(2-3):23Google Scholar
  16. Stratus Consulting (2010) Climate change impacts on transportation infrastructure, Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGoogle Scholar
  17. TRB (2008) Potential impacts of climate change on US transportation, TRB Special Report 290. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  18. UNFCCC (2009) “Support needed to fully implement National Adaptation Programmes of Action (NAPA’s), least developed countries”. LDC Expert Group 2009. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  19. World Bank (2009). The costs to developing countries of adapting to climate change new methods and estimates, Consultation Draft, World BankGoogle Scholar
  20. World Bank (2010). Economics of adaptation to climate change. World Bank, EthiopiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Chinowsky
    • 1
  • Amy Schweikert
    • 2
  • Niko Strzepek
    • 2
  • Kyle Manahan
    • 2
  • Kenneth Strzepek
    • 3
  • C. Adam Schlosser
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental and Architectural EngineeringUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Climate and Civil Systems GroupUniversity of ColoradoBoulderUSA
  3. 3.MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global ChangeBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations