Climatic Change

, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 373–387 | Cite as

Impacts of a nuclear war in South Asia on soybean and maize production in the Midwest United States

  • Mutlu Özdoğan
  • Alan Robock
  • Christopher J. Kucharik
Article

Abstract

Crop production would decline in the Midwestern United States from climate change following a regional nuclear conflict between India and Pakistan. Using Agro-IBIS, a dynamic agroecosystem model, we simulated the response of maize and soybeans to cooler, drier, and darker conditions from war-related smoke. We combined observed climate conditions for the states of Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, and Missouri with output from a general circulation climate model simulation that injected 5 Tg of elemental carbon into the upper troposphere. Both maize and soybeans showed notable yield reductions for a decade after the event. Maize yields declined 10–40 % while soybean yields dropped 2–20 %. Temporal variation in magnitude of yield for both crops generally followed the variation in climatic anomalies, with the greatest decline in the 5 years following the 5 Tg event and then less, but still substantial yield decline, for the rest of the decade. Yield reduction for both crops was linked to changes in growing period duration and, less markedly, to reduced precipitation and altered maximum daily temperature during the growing season. The seasonal average of daily maximum temperature anomalies, combined with precipitation and radiation changes, had a quadratic relationship to yield differences; small (0 °C) and large (−3 °C) maximum temperature anomalies combined with other changes led to increased yield loss, but medium changes (−1 °C) had small to neutral effects on yield. The exact timing of the temperature changes during the various crop growth phases also had an important effect.

References

  1. Ainsworth EA, Ort DR (2010) How do we improve crop production in a warming world? Plant Physiol 154:526–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Donner SD, Kucharik CJ (2003) Evaluating the impacts of land management and climate variability on crop production and nitrate export across the Upper Mississippi Basin. Global Biogeochem Cycles 17(3):1085. doi:10.1029/2001GB001808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ehrlich PR, Harte J, Harwell MA, Raven PH, Sagan C, Woodwell GM, Berry J, Ayensu ES, Ehrlich AH, Eisner T, Gould Sl, Grover HD, Herrera R, May RM, Mayr E, McKay CP, Mooney HA, Myers N, Pimentel D, Teal JM (1983) Long-term biological consequences of nuclear war. Science 222:1293–1300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Foley JA, Prentice IC, Ramunkutty N, Levis S, Pollard D, Sitch S, Haxeltine A (1996) An integrated biosphere model of land surface processes, terrestrial carbon balance and vegetation dynamics. Global Biogeochem Cycles 10:603–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Harington CR (ed) (1992) The year without a summer? World climate in 1816. Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, p 576Google Scholar
  6. Harwell MA, Cropper WP (1985) Potential effects of nuclear war on agricultural productivity. In: Harwell MA, Hutchinson TC (eds) SCOPE 28—environmental consequences of nuclear war volume II: ecological and agricultural effects. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 271–355Google Scholar
  7. Kucharik CJ (2003) Evaluation of a process-based agro-ecosystem model (Agro-IBIS) across the U.S. cornbelt: simulations of the inter-annual variability in maize yield. Earth Interact 7:1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kucharik CJ (2006) A multidecadal trend of earlier corn planting in the central U.S. Agron J 98:1544–1550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kucharik CJ (2008) Contribution of planting date trends to increased maize yields in the central United States. Agron J 100:328–336. doi:10.2134/agronjnl2007.0145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kucharik CJ, Brye KR (2003) Integrated BIosphere Simulator (IBIS) yield and nitrate loss predictions for Wisconsin maize receiving varied amounts of nitrogen fertilizer. J Environ Qual 32:247–268Google Scholar
  11. Kucharik CJ, Twine TE (2007) Residue, respiration, and residuals: evaluation of a dynamic agroecosystem model using eddy flux measurements and biometric data. Agric For Meteorol 146:134–158. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.05.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kucharik CJ, Foley JA, Delire C, Fisher VA, Coe MT, Gower ST, Lenters J, Molling C, Norman JM, Ramankutty N (2000) Testing the performance of a dynamic global ecosystem model: water balance, carbon balance, and vegetation structure. Global Biogeochem Cycles 14:795–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lobell DB, Field CB (2007) Global scale climate-crop yield relationships and the impacts of recent warming. Environ Res Lett 2:014002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (2008) Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030. Science 319:607–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lopes M, Araus JL, van Heerden PDR, Foyer CH (2011) Enhancing drought tolerance in C4 crops. J Exp Bot 62(9):3135–3153. doi:10.1093/jxb/err105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mills MJ, Toon OB, Turco RP, Kinnison DE, Garcia RR (2008) Massive global ozone loss predicted following regional nuclear conflict. P Nat Acad Sci 105:5307–5312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) (2011) Environmental database—http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_Subject/Environmental/index.asp
  18. Oppenheimer C (2003) Climatic, environmental and human consequences of the largest known historic eruption: Tambora volcano (Indonesia) 1815. Prog Phys Geogr 27(2):230–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Post JD (1977) The last great subsistence crisis in the western world. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, p 240Google Scholar
  20. Robock A (1988) Enhancement of surface cooling due to forest fire smoke. Science 242:911–913Google Scholar
  21. Robock A (1991) Surface cooling due to forest fire smoke. J Geophys Res 96:20,869–20,878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Robock A, Oman L, Stenchikov GL, Toon OB, Bardeen C, Turco RP (2007) Climatic consequences of regional nuclear conflicts. Atm Chem Phys 7:2003–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sacks WJ, Kucharik CJ (2011) Trends in crop management and phenology in the U.S. corn belt, and impacts on yields, evapotranspiration, and energy balance. Agric For Meteorol. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2011.02.010
  24. Schmidt GA, Ruedy R, Hansen JE et al (2006) Present-day atmospheric simulations using GISS ModelE: comparison to in situ, satellite, and reanalysis data. J Clim 19:153–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sinclair TR (1986) Simulated soya bean production during the recovery phase of a nuclear winter. Agr Ecosyst Environ 17:181–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Spitters CJT (1986) Separating the diffuse and direct component of global radiation and its implications for modeling canopy photosynthesis Part II. Calculation of canopy photosynthesis. Agr Forest Meteorol 38(1–3):231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stommel H, Stommel E (1979) The year without a summer. Sci Am 240:176–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tollenaar M, Lee EA (2010) Strategies for enhancing grain yield in maize. In: Janick J (ed) Plant breeding reviews, vol 34. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken. doi:10.1002/9780470880579.ch2 Google Scholar
  29. Toon OB, Robock A, Turco RP (2008) Environmental consequences of nuclear war. Phys Today 61(12):37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Twine TE, Kucharik CJ (2008) Evaluating a terrestrial ecosystem model with satellite information of greenness. J Geophys Res 113:G03027. doi:10.1029/2007JG000599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xia L, Robock A (2012) Impacts of nuclear war in South Asia on rice production in Mainland China, Climatic Change, this issueGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mutlu Özdoğan
    • 1
  • Alan Robock
    • 2
  • Christopher J. Kucharik
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment & Department of Forest and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental SciencesRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment & Department of AgronomyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations