Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 115, Issue 3–4, pp 741–757 | Cite as

Seeing the trees for the carbon: agroforestry for development and carbon mitigation

  • Emily K. AndersonEmail author
  • Hisham Zerriffi
Article

Abstract

Land-use, land-use change and forestry (LULUCF) activities will play an important role in global climate change mitigation. Many carbon schemes require the delivery of both climate and rural development benefits by mitigation activities conducted in developing countries. Agroforestry is a LULUCF activity that is gaining attention because of its potential to deliver climate benefits as well as rural development benefits to smallholders. There is hope that agroforestry can deliver co-benefits for climate and development; however experience with early projects suggests co-benefits are difficult to achieve in practice. We review the literature on agroforestry, participatory rural development, tree-based carbon projects and co-benefit carbon projects to look at how recommended project characteristics align when trying to generate different types of benefits. We conclude that there is considerable tension inherent in designing co-benefit smallholder agroforestry projects. We suggest that designing projects to seek ancillary benefits rather than co-benefits may help to reduce this tension.

Keywords

Project Design Carbon Credit Project Characteristic Carbon Mitigation Development Benefit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge funding support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, the Government of British Columbia and the Faculty of Graduate Studies at the University of British Columbia. The authors are grateful to Gary Bull, James Tansey and three anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and feedback, and to Rita Zamluk for editing assistance.

Supplementary material

10584_2012_456_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 38 kb)
10584_2012_456_MOESM2_ESM.docx (74 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 73 kb)

References

  1. Albrecht A, Kandji ST (2003) Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 99(1–3):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson EK (2010) Can planting trees bring co-benefits? Smallholder tree planting for development and carbon mitigation. Dissertation. The University of British Columbia, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  3. Appiah M, Blay D, Damnyag L, Dwomoh F, Pappinen A, Luukkanen O (2009) Dependence on forest resources and tropical deforestation in Ghana. Environ Dev Sustain 11(3):471–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashley C, Carney D (1999) Sustainable livelihoods: lessons from early experience. Department for International Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Aunan K, Fang J, Vennemo H, Oye K, Seip HM (2004) Co-benefits of climate policy–lessons learned from a study in Shanxi, China. Energy Pol 32(4):567–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bailis R (2006) Climate change mitigation and sustainable development through carbon sequestration: experiences in Latin America. Energy Sustain Dev X(4):74–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard HR (2006) Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 4th edn. AltaMira Press, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  8. Bognetteau E, Haile A, Wiersum KF (2007) Linking forests and people, a potential for sustainable development of the Southwest Ethiopian highlands. In: Proceedings International Conference on Participatory Forest Management, Biodiversity and Livelihoods in Africa, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
  9. Boyd E, Gutierrez M, Chang M (2007) Small-scale forest carbon projects: adapting CDM to low-income communities. Glob Environ Chang 17(2):250–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown K, Corbera E (2003) Exploring equity and sustainable development in the new carbon economy. Climate Pol 3(S1):s41–s56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown S, Burnham M, Delaney M, Powell M, Vaca R, Moreno A (2000) Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon-offset projects: a case study of the Noel Kempff climate action project in Bolivia. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 5(1):99–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bull GQ, Hegde R, Gong Y, Han K (2008) Impacts of forest carbon markets on local livelihoods: China, Mozambique and Afghanistan. In: Forests, Rights and Climate Change, OsloGoogle Scholar
  13. Cacho OJ, Lipper L (2007) Abatement and transaction costs of carbon-sink projects involving smallholders. Working Paper 32. FondazioneEni Enrico Mattei, Rome. Berkley Electronic PressGoogle Scholar
  14. Cacho OJ, Marshall GR, Milne M (2002) Smallholder agroforestry projects: potential for carbon sequestration and poverty alleviation. FAO ES technical series working paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  15. Cacho OJ, Wise RM, MacDicken KG (2004) Carbon monitoring costs and their effect on incentives to sequester carbon through forestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 9(3):273–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cacho OJ, Marshall GR, Milne M (2005) Transaction and abatement costs of carbon-sink projects in developing countries. Environ Dev Econ 10(05):597–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Campbell LM, Vainio-Mattila A (2003) Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned? Hum Ecol 31(3):417–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chivinge O (2006) Capacity building in agroforestry in Africa and Southeast Asia. In: Garrity D, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrott S (eds) World agroforestry into the future. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, pp 135–140Google Scholar
  19. Corbera E, Brown K (2008) Building institutions to trade ecosystem services: marketing forest carbon in Mexico. World Dev 36(10):1956–1979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cosbey A, Parry JE, Browne J, Babu YD, Bhandari P, Drexhage J, Murphy D (2005) Realizing the development dividend: making the CDM work for developing countries. International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), WinnipegGoogle Scholar
  21. Council of the European Union (2009) Summary: joint ACP-EU declaration on climate change and development. Council of the European Union. www.europa-eu-un.org/articles/en/article_8763_en.htm. Accessed 13 October 2010
  22. Current D, Scherr S (1995) Farmer costs and benefits from agroforestry and farm forestry projects in central America and the Caribbean: implications for policy. Agrofor Syst 30(1):87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Current D, Lutz E, Scherr SJ (1995) The costs and benefits of agroforestry to farmers. World Bank Res Obs 10(2):151–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dixon R (1995) Agroforestry systems: sources of sinks of greenhouse gases? Agrofor Syst 31(2):99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dixon RK, Winjum JK, Andrasko KJ, Lee JJ, Schroeder PE (1994) Integrated land-use systems: assessment of promising agroforest and alternative land-use practices to enhance carbon conservation and sequestration. Clim Chang 27(1):71–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dolan T (2006) Sustainable agriculture and rural development–a response to the realities of rural Africa. In: Garrity D, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrott S (eds) World agroforestry into the future. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, pp 129–133Google Scholar
  27. FAO (2010) Trees outside forests/agroforestry systems. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations.www.fao.org/forestry/9469/en/ Accessed 5 October 2010
  28. Fischer A, Vasseur L (2000) The crisis in shifting cultivation practices and the promise of agroforestry: a review of the Panamanian experience. Biodivers Conserv 9(6):739–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fischer A, Vasseur L (2002) Smallholder perceptions of agroforestry projects in Panama. Agrofor Syst 54(2):103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garrity D (2004) Agroforestry and the achievement of the millennium development goals. Agrofor Syst 61–62(1):5–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gong Y, Bull G, Baylis K (2010) Participation in the world’s first clean development mechanism forest project: the role of property rights, social capital and contractual rules. Ecol Econ 69(6):1292–1302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grieg-Gran M, Porras I, Wunder S (2005) How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Dev 33(9):1511–1527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton K, Chokkalingam U, Bendana M (2010) State of the forest carbon markets 2009: taking root and branching out. Forest Trends Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  34. Harris E (2007) The voluntary carbon offsets market: an analysis of market characteristics and opportunities for sustainable development. Markets for environmental services 10. International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Haupt F, von Lüpke H (2007) Obstacles and opportunities for afforestation and reforestation projects under the clean development mechanism of the Kyoto protocol. Advisory Committee on Paper and Wood Products, FAO, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  36. Hayward C, Simpson L, Wood L (2004) Still left out in the cold: problematising participatory research and development. Sociol Rural 44(1):95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Heifer International (2010) Sustainable livelihood assessment for communities living around kikonda forest reserve, kiboga district. Heifer International, KibogaGoogle Scholar
  38. ICRAF (2010) Agroforestry and our role. World Agroforestry Centre. www.worldagroforestry.org/about_us/our_role_in_agroforestry. Accessed 5 October 2010
  39. Jama B, Elias E, Mogotsi K (2006) Role of agroforestry in improving food security and natural resource management in the drylands: a regional overview. J Dryland 1(2):206–211Google Scholar
  40. Jindal R, Swallow B, Kerr J (2008) Forestry-based carbon sequestration projects in Africa: potential benefits and challenges. Nat Resour Forum 32:116–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kossoy A, Ambrosi P (2010) State and trends of the carbon market 2010. World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  42. Lal R (2004a) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304(5677):1623–1627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lal R (2004b) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123(1–2):1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Leach G, Leach M (2004) Carbonising forest landscapes? Linking climate change mitigation and rural livelihoods. IDS Bull 35(3):76–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leakey RRB, Tchoundjeu Z, Schreckenberg K, Shackleton SE, Shackleton CM (2005) Agroforestry Tree Products (AFTPs): targeting poverty reduction and enhanced livelihoods. Int J Agric Sustain 3(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lile R, Powell M, Toman M (1998) Implementing the clean development mechanism: lessons from US private-sector participation in activities implemented jointly. Discussion paper 99–08. Resources for the Future, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  47. Locatelli B, Evans V, Wardell A, Andreade A, Vignola R (2011) Forests and climate change in Latin America: linking adaptation and mitigation. Forests 2:431–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lövbrand E, Rindefjäll T, Nordqvist J (2009) Closing the legitimacy gap in global environmental governance? Lessons from the emerging CDM market. Global Environ Polit 9(2):74–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Macqueen D (2009) Roots of success: cultivating viable community forestry. IIED briefing papers. International Institute for Environment and Development, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Makundi WR, Okiting’ati A (1995) Carbon flows and economic evaluation of mitigation options in Tanzania’s forest sector. Biomass Bioenergy 8(5):381–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. May P, Boyd E, Chang M, Veiga Neto F (2005) Incorporating sustainable development into carbon forest projects in Brazil and Bolivia. Estudos Sociedade e Agricultura 13(1):5–50Google Scholar
  52. Milne M (1999) Transaction costs of forest carbon projects. Working paper CC05. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), BogorGoogle Scholar
  53. Milne M, Arroyo P (2003) Assessing the livelihood benefits to local communities from the Profafor Carbon Sequestration Project, Ecuador. In: Developing Mechanisms for Rewarding the Upland Poor in Asia for the Environmental Services They Provide. ICRAF and RUPES Regional Inception/Planning Workshop, PuncakGoogle Scholar
  54. Mohan G (2007) Participatory development: from epistemological reversals to active citizenship. Geogr Compass 1(4):779–796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Montagnini F, Nair PR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61–62(1):281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Murdiyarso D, van Noordwijk M, Puntodewo A, Widayati A, Lusiana B (2008) District-scale prioritization for A/R CDM project activities in Indonesia in line with sustainable development objectives. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126(1–2):59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mutuo P, Cadisch G, Albrecht A, Palm C, Verchot L (2005) Potential of agroforestry for carbon sequestration and mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions from soils in the tropics. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 71(1):43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers in cooperation with International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nair PKR (2007) The coming of age of agroforestry. J Sci Food Agric 87(9):1613–1619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172(1):10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Nelson KC, de Jong BHJ (2003) Making global initiatives local realities: carbon mitigation projects in Chiapas, Mexico. Glob Environ Chang 13(1):19–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Niles JO, Brown S, Pretty J, Ball AS, Fay J (2002) Potential carbon mitigation and income in developing countries from changes in use and management of agricultural and forest lands. Phil Trans Math, Phys Eng Sci 360(1797):1621–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nishiki M (2007) The clean development mechanism and local sustainability. Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  64. Noble IR, Dirzo R (1997) Forests as human-dominated ecosystems. Science 277(5325):522–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Oelbermann M, Paul Voroney R, Gordon AM (2004) Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104(3):359–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Olsen K (2007) The clean development mechanism’s contribution to sustainable development: a review of the literature. Clim Chang 84(1):59–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Palm C, Tomich T, van Noordwijk M, Vosti S, Gockowski J, Alegre J, Verchot L (2004) Mitigating GHG emissions in the humid tropics: case studies from the alternatives to slash-and-burn program (ASB). Environ Dev Sustain 6(1):145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pandey DN (2007) Multifunctional agroforestry systems in India. Curr Sci 92(4):455–463Google Scholar
  69. Pieterse JN (1998) My paradigm or yours? Alternative development, post–development, reflexive development. Dev Chang 29(2):343–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Pittel K, Rübbelke DT (2008) Climate policy and ancillary benefits: a survey and integration into the modeling of international negotiations on climate change. Ecol Econ 68(1–2):210–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reynolds PE, Simpson JA, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM (2007) Effects of tree competition on corn and soybean photosynthesis, growth, and yield in a temperate tree-based agroforestry intercropping system in southern Ontario, Canada. Ecol Eng 29(4):362–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Roshetko J, Lasco R, Angeles M (2007) Smallholder agroforestry systems for carbon storage. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12(2):219–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rudebjer PG, Van So N, Kaboggoza JR (2006) Institutional collaboration in agroforestry: networking and knowledge management. In: Garrity D, Okono A, Grayson M, Parrott S (eds) World agroforestry into the future. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi, pp 142–146Google Scholar
  74. Sanchez PA (1999) Delivering on the promise of agroforestry. Environ Dev Sustain 1(3):275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sanchez PA (2000) Linking climate change research with food security and poverty reduction in the tropics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82(1–3):371–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sathaye JA, Makundi WR, Andrasko K, Boer R, Ravindranath NH, Sudha P, Rao S, Lasco R, Pulhin F, Masera O, Ceron A, Ordonez J, Deying X, Zhang X, Zuomin S (2001) Carbon mitigation potential and costs of forestry options in Brazil, China, India, Indonesia, Mexico, the Philippines and Tanzania. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 6(3):185–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Schroeder P (1994) Carbon storage benefits of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 27(1):89–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Seeberg-Elverfeldt C, Schwarze S, Zeller M (2009) Payments for environmental services—carbon finance options for smallholders’ agroforestry in Indonesia. Intern J Common 3(1):108–130Google Scholar
  79. Shiferaw BA, Okello J, Reddy RV (2009) Adoption and adaptation of natural resource management innovations in smallholder agriculture: reflections on key lessons and best practices. Environ Dev Sustain 11(3):601–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Siriri D, Ong CK, Wilson J, Boffa JM, Black CR (2009) Tree species and pruning regime affect crop yield on bench terraces in SW Uganda. Agrofor Syst 78(1):65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Skutsch MM (2004) Reducing carbon transaction costs in community based forest management. Centre for Clean Technology and Environmental Policy (CSTM), University of Twente, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  82. Smith J, Scherr SJ (2003) Capturing the value of forest carbon for local livelihoods. World Dev 31(12):2143–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Sutter C, Parreño J (2007) Does the current Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) deliver its sustainable development claim? An analysis of officially registered CDM projects. Clim Chang 84(1):75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Torres AB, Marchant R, Lovett JC, Smart JCR, Tipper R (2010) Analysis of the carbon sequestration costs of afforestation and reforestation agroforestry practices and the use of cost curves to evaluate their potential for implementation of climate change mitigation. Ecol Econ 69(3):469–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tschakert P, Coomes OT, Potvin C (2007) Indigenous livelihoods, slash-and-burn agriculture and carbon stocks in Eastern Panama. Ecol Econ 69(3):807–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. UNFCCC (2009) Draft decision -/CP.15 Copenhagen Accord, 15th Conference of Parties to the UNFCCC. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  87. van Noordwijk M, Suyamto DA, Lusiana B, Ekadinata A, Hairiah K (2008) Facilitating agroforestation of landscapes for sustainable benefits: tradeoffs between carbon stocks and local development benefits in Indonesia according to the FALLOW model. Agric Ecosyst Environ 126(1–2):98–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Van Vliet OPR, Faaij APC, Dieperink C (2003) Forestry projects under the clean development mechanism? Clim Chang 61(1):123–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Vatn A (2010) An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecol Econ 69(6):1245–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Watson RT, Noble IR, Bolin B, Ravindranath NH, Verardo DJ, Dokken DJ (eds) (2000) Land use, land-use change, and forestry. Published for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change by Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  91. Williams G (2004) Evaluating participatory development: tyranny, power and (re)politicisation. Third World Q 25(3):557–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wittman HK, Caron C (2009) Carbon offsets and inequality: social costs and co-benefits in Guatemala and Sri Lanka. Soc Nat Resour: An Intern J 22(8):710–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Resources, Environment and SustainabilityThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Liu Institute for Global IssuesThe University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations