Climatic Change

, Volume 114, Issue 3–4, pp 479–495 | Cite as

Is climate change an ethical issue? Examining young adults’ beliefs about climate and morality

Article

Abstract

Moral philosophers argue that climate change poses an ‘ethical problem’ for humanity and thus that humans have moral obligations to respond. Little empirical research has explored whether non-philosophers agree with these conclusions. This is unfortunate, because non-experts’ moral intuitions (or lack thereof) about climate change likely hold important implications for willingness to engage cognitively, emotionally and behaviorally with the issue. After reviewing the moral philosophical position on climate change, I present results of two studies conducted with a total of 922 U.S. undergraduate students that explored beliefs about the ‘ethics of climate change.’ Forty-five percent of the students sampled stated unequivocally that climate change represents a moral or ethical issue; a full quarter of students said it was not an ethical issue and roughly 30% were unsure. Participants’ beliefs regarding the causes of climate change were predictive of intentions to perform pro-environmental actions, and this relationship was fully mediated by ascriptions of personal moral obligation to respond. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

References

  1. Baron J (2012) Parochialism as a result of cognitive biases. In: Woods AK, Goodman R, Jinks D (eds) Understanding social action, promoting human rights. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  2. Benedict XVI (2009) Caritas in veritae: encyclical letter on integral human development in charity and truth. St. Pauls Publications, VaticanGoogle Scholar
  3. Bord RJ, Fisher A, O’Connor RE (1998) Public perceptions of global warming: United States and international perspectives. Clim Res 11:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Broome J (2008) The ethics of climate change: pay now or pay more later? Sci Am 298:96–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butler C (2010) Morality and climate change: is leaving your TV on standby a risky behaviour? Environ Val 19:169–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cushman F (2008) Crime and punishment: distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition 108:353–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davidson MD (2008) Wrongful harm to future generations: the case of climate change. Environ Val 17:471–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dessai S, Adger WN, Hulme M, Turnpenny J, Kohler J, Warren R (2004) Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change. Clim Change 64:11–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ditto PH, Pizarro DA, Tannenbaum D (2009) Motivated moral reasoning. Psychol Learn Motiv 50:307–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doherty TJ, Clayton S (2011) The psychological impacts of global climate change. Am Psychol 66:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feinberg M, Willer R (2011) Apocalypse soon? Dire messages reduce belief in global warming by contradicting just-world beliefs. Psychol Science 22:34–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feinberg M, Willer R (Under review) The moral roots of environmental attitudesGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferguson MA, Branscombe NR (2010) Collective guilt mediates the effect o beliefs about global warming on willingness to engage in mitigation behavior. J Environ Psychol 30:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feygina I, Jost JT, Goldsmith RE (2010) System justification, the denial of global warming, and the possibility of “system-sanctioned change. Per Soc Psychol Bull 36:326–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gardiner SM (2006) A perfect moral storm: climate change, intergenerational ethics and the problem of moral corruption. Environ Val 15:397–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Guglielmo S, Monroe AE, Malle BF (2009) At the heart of morality lies folk psychology. Inquiry 52:449–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haidt J (2007) The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science 316:998–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haidt J (2008) Morality. Perspect Psychol Sci 3:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haidt J, Graham J (2007) When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Soc Justice Res 20:98–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardin G (1968) Tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Helm D (2008) Climate-change policy: why has so little been achieved? Oxf Rev Econ Pol 24:211–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hourdequin M (2010) Climate, collective action and individual ethical obligations. Environ Val 19:443–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. IPCC (2007) Summary for Policymakers, Synthesis Report. In: Bernstein L et al (eds) Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Jamieson D (2007) The moral and political challenges of climate change. In: Moser S, Dilling L (eds) Creating a climate for change. Communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 119–138Google Scholar
  25. Jamieson D (2009) Climate change, responsibility, and justice. Sci Eng Ethics 16:431–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L, Visser PS (2006) The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming. Clim Change 77:7–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull 108:480–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C (2009) Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ climate change beliefs, attitudes, policy preferences, and actions. New Haven, Yale Project On Climate Change, http://environment.yale.edu/climate/
  29. Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2011) Climate change in the American mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in May 2011. New Haven, Yale Project on Climate Change, http://environment.yale.edu/climate/
  30. Lord CG, Ross L, Lepper MR (1979) Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol 37:2098–2109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Markowitz EM, Shariff AF (2012) Climate change and moral judgement. Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/NCLIMATE1378
  32. Moore KD, Nelson MP (2010) Moral ground: Ethical action for a planet in Peril. Trinity University Press, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  33. Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Norgaard KM (2006) “People just want to protect themselves a little bit”: Emotions, denial, and social movement nonparticipation. Sociol Inq 76:372–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norgaard KM (2011) Living in denial: Climate change, emotions and everyday life. MIT, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav Res Meth 40:879–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shue H (1993) Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions. Law Pol 15:39–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shwom R, Bidwell D, Dan A, Dietz T (2010) Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Glob Environ Change 20:472–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singer P (2006) Ethics and climate change: a commentary on MacCracken, Toman, and Gardiner. Environ Val 15:415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stern N (2006) Stern review on the economics of climate change. HM Treasury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Stoll-Kleemann S, O’Riodan T, Jaeger CC (2001) The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups. Glob Environ Change 11:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swim J et al (2009) Psychology and global climate change: Addressing a multi-faceted phenomenon and set of challenges. American Psychological Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  43. Wardekker A, Petersen AC, van der Sluijs JP (2009) Ethics and public perception of climate change: exploring the Christian voices in the U.S. public debate. Glob Environ Change 19:512–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weber E (2006) Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Clim Change 77:103–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. World Health Organization (2010) The solid facts on climate change and health. WHO, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  46. Yeager DS, Larson SB, Krosnick J, Tompson T (2011) Measuring Americans’ issue priorities: a new version of the most important problem question reveals more concern about global warming and the environment. Pub Opin Q 75:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Environmental Studies Program, Department of PsychologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations