Climatic Change

, Volume 111, Issue 3–4, pp 983–991 | Cite as

Complex aspen forest carbon and root dynamics during drought

A letter
  • William R. L. AndereggEmail author


Drought-induced vegetation mortality has been documented on every vegetated continent in recent decades and constitutes a major uncertainty in climate change impacts on terrestrial ecosystems and carbon cycle feedbacks. While recent research has focused on specific failure mechanisms during drought-induced forest die-off, a broader understanding of the physiology of trees under drought, especially changes in growth and carbon allocation, is needed for determining the sensitivity of forests to drought and interacting mechanisms during forest mortality. I present here multi-tissue and high-resolution temporal dynamics of tree carbon resources during moderate experimental and natural drought in trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) forests, a major forest type in western North America that recently experienced widespread drought-induced die-off. Drought led to substantial declines in inferred carbon uptake. Tree carbohydrate concentrations, however, largely increased in concert with substantial decreases in growth and severe declines in root biomass. These findings highlight that growth declines, especially in fine roots which are important to water uptake, and increased carbon allocation to root non-structural carbohydrates are key responses to drought in aspen and could play an important role in widespread die-off. They suggest multi-year consequences of drought and carbon-hydraulic interconnections. They underscore the need for a more integrated multi-tissue, multi-process, and multi-year perspective of climate-induced forest mortality.


Fine Root Drought Tree Fine Root Biomass Carbon Uptake Moderate Drought 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



I thank E. Callaway, L. Anderegg, M. Anderegg, M. Love, C. Sherman for assistance with fieldwork. I thank E. Pringle, T. Raab, L. Anderegg, A. Winslow, A. Hauslade, N. Bitler, A. Lunny, W. Lagrandeur, J. Burr, A. Hines, M. Erviti, G. Griffin, M. Dini, S. Shin for assistance in laboratory work. I thank H. Mooney, J. Berry, and C. Field for helpful comments on the manuscript and A. Nees for providing the landscape fine root data. I thank the Bill Lane Center for the American West, Morrison Institute of Population and Resource Studies, Phi Beta Kappa Northern California Association, Jasper Ridge Biological Preserve, Stanford Biology SCORE Program for research equipment and funding. W.R.L.A. was supported in part by an award from the Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Science Graduate Fellowship Program (DOE SCGF). The DOE SCGF Program was made possible in part by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. The DOE SCGF program is administered by the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education for the DOE. ORISE is managed by Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) under DOE contract number DE-AC05-06OR23100. All opinions expressed in this paper are the author’s and do not necessarily reflect the policies and views of DOE, ORAU, or ORISE.

Supplementary material

10584_2012_421_MOESM1_ESM.doc (40 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 40 kb)
10584_2012_421_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (39 kb)
Figure S1 Sap-flow (mean +/− SEM; kg H2O/m2 sapwood area/day) of a the healthier, northwest-facing stand (Site H; gray) and more stressed, south-facing stand (Site S; black) during seasonal drought. (PDF 38 kb)
10584_2012_421_MOESM3_ESM.pdf (52 kb)
Figure S2 Percent dry mass (mean +/− SEM) of starch (A) and sucrose (B) in tissues from potted trees on a bi-weekly basis. Blue bars are those of control trees; Red bars are those of drought trees. (PDF 52 kb)


  1. Adams HD et al (2009) Temperature sensitivity of drought-induced tree mortality portends increased regional die-off under global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:7063–7066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen CD et al (2010) A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecol Manag 259:660–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderegg WRL, et al (In Review) Drought characteristics explain patterns in widespread aspen forest mortality across the western United States. OecologiaGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderegg WRL et al (2011) The roles of hydraulic and carbon stress in a widespread drought-induced forest mortality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107891109
  5. Barr AG et al (2007) Climatic controls on the carbon and water balances of a boreal aspen forest, 1994–2003. Glob Chang Biol 13:561–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonan GB (2008) Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320:1444–1448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Breshears DD et al (2005) Regional vegetation die-off in response to global-change-type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:15144–15148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dale VH, Joyce LA, McNulty S, Neilson RP (2000) The interplay between climate change, forests, and disturbances. Sci Total Environ 262:201–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galvez DA, Landhäusser SM, Tyree MT. (2011) Root carbon reserve dynamics in aspen seedlings: does simulated drought induce reserve limitation? Tree Physiol 31:250–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gower ST, Vogel JG, Norman JM, Kucharik CJ, Steele SJ, Stow TK (1997) Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. J Geophys Res 102(29):029–041Google Scholar
  11. Hartmann H (2011) Will a 385 million year-struggle for light become a struggle for water and for carbon? – how trees may cope with more frequent climate change-type drought events. Glob Chang Biol 17:642–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hogg EH, Brandt JP, Kochtubajda B (2005) Factors affecting interannual variation in growth of western Canadian aspen forests during 1951–2000. Can J For Res 35:610–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hsiao TC (1973) Plant responses to water stress. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 24:519–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang C, Anderegg WRL (2012) Large regional drought-induced biomass losses of the rocky mountain aspen forests. Glob Change Biol 18:1016–1027. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02592.x
  15. Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7362–7366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kurz W et al (2008a) Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 452:987–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kurz W, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Dymond CC, Neilson ET (2008b) Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada’s forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:1551–1556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maurer EP, Wood AW, Adam JC, Lettenmaier DP, Nijssen B (2002) A long-term hydrologically based dataset of land surface fluxes and states for the conterminous United States. J Clim 15:3237–3251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McDowell N et al (2008) Mechanisms of plant survival and mortality during drought: why do some plants survive while others succumb to drought? New Phytol 178:719–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McDowell N, Beerling DJ, Breashers DD, Fisher RA, Raffa K, Stitt M (2011) Interrelated mechanisms of drought-induced tree mortality. Trends Ecol Evol 26:523–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Perala DA (1990) Populus tremuloides. In: Burns RM, Honkala BH (eds) Silvics of North America. Hardwoods. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Washington, DC, pp 555–569Google Scholar
  22. Phillips OL et al (2009) Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science 323:1344–1348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pinno BD, Wilson SD, Steinaker DF, Van Rees KCJ, McDonald SA (2010) Fine root dynamics of trembling aspen in boreal forest and aspen parkland in central Canada. Ann For Sci 67:710–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rehfeldt GE, Ferguson DE, Crookston NL (2009) Aspen, climate, and sudden decline in western USA. Forest Ecol Manag 258:2353–2364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sala A (2009) Lack of direct evidence for the carbon-starvation hypothesis to explain drought-induced mortality in trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:E68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sala A, Piper F, Hoch G (2010) Physiological mechanisms of drought induced tree mortality are far from being resolved. New Phytol 186:274–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schulze ED, Robichaux RH, Grace J, Rundel PW, Ehleringer JR (1987) Plant water balance. BioScience 37:30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sperry JS, Perry A, Sullivan JEM (1991) Pit membrane degradation and air-embolism formation in aging xylem vessels of Populus tremuloides. J Exp Bot 42:1399–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Van Mantgem PJ et al (2009) Widespread increase of tree mortality rates in the western United States. Science 323:521–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Worrall JJ et al (2010) Effects and etiology of sudden aspen decline in southwestern Colorado. Forest Ecol Manag 250:638–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Department of Global EcologyCarnegie Institution for ScienceStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations