Is it possible to limit global warming to no more than 1.5°C?
- 574 Downloads
This study explores the feasibility of limiting increases in global temperature to 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. A probabilistic simple climate model is used to identify emissions paths that offer at least a 50% chance of achieving this goal. We conclude that it is more likely than not that warming would exceed 1.5°C, at least temporarily, under plausible mitigation scenarios. We have identified three criteria of emissions paths that could meet the 1.5°C goal with a temporary overshoot of no more than 50 years: early and strong reductions in emissions, with global emissions peaking in 2015 and falling to at most 44–48 GtCO2e in 2020; rapid reductions in annual global emissions after 2020 (of at least 3–4% per year); very low annual global emissions by 2100 (less than 2–4 GtCO2e) and falling to zero (or below) in the 22nd century. The feasibility of these characteristics is uncertain. We conclude that the proposed date of review of the 1.5°C goal, set at 2015, may be too late to achieve the necessary scaling up of emissions cuts to achieve this goal.
KeywordsEmission Reduction Global Emission Global Average Temperature Emission Path Negative Emission
The authors wish to thank Brian Hoskins, Andrew Gouldson, Piers Forster, Nicholas Stern and the two anonymous reviewers for their comments. Nicola Ranger, Alex Bowen and Robert Ward were supported during this project by Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment and the UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). Laila Gohar and Jason Lowe were supported during this project by the AVOID programme funded by the UK Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), under contract DECC/Defra GA0215. The Met Office Hadley Centre provided scientific input to this work but does not advocate particular policy choices.
- Arora VK, Scinocca JF, Boer GJ, Christian JR, Denman KL, Flato GM, Kharin VV, Lee WG, Merryfield WJ (2011) Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases. Geophys Res Lett 38:L05805. doi: 10.1029/2010GL046270
- Edenhofer O, Carraro C, Hourcade J-C et al (2009) The Economics of Decarbonization. Report of the RECIPE project. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
- Gohar LK and Lowe JA (2009) Summary of the emissions mitigation scenarios: part 1.Work stream 1, Report 2 of the AVOID programme (AV/WS1/D1/R02). Available online at www.avoid.uk.net
- Good P, Gregory JM, Lowe JA and Andrew T Predicting and understanding CMIP5 representive concentration pathway projections using the response to abrupt CO2 change. Submitted to Climate DynamicsGoogle Scholar
- Knopf B, Edenhofer O, Barker T et al (2009) The economics of low stabilisation: implications for technological change and policy. In: Hulme M, Neufeldt H (eds) Making climate change work for us: ADAM synthesis book. Cambridge University Press, UKGoogle Scholar
- Lowe JA, Huntingford C, Raper SCB, Jones CD, Liddicoat SK, Gohar LK (2009) How difficult is it to recover from dangerous levels of global warming? Environ Res Lett. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/4/1/014012
- Magné B, Kypreos S, Turton H (2010) Technological options for low stabilisation pathways with MERGE. Energ J 31:83–107Google Scholar
- Moss RH, Edmonds JA, Hibbard KA et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature. doi: 10.1038/nature08823
- Ranger N, Bowen A, Lowe J and Gohar L (2009) Mitigating climate change through reductions in greenhouse gas emissions: climate science constraints on annual global emissions targets for 2020 and 2050. In “Mitigating climate change through reductions in greenhouse gas emissions: the science and economics of future paths for global annual emissions” [Bowen, A and Ranger, N.] Grantham/CCCEP Policy Brief No. 2. http://www2.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/publications/Policy/docs/PBMitigatingBowenRangerDec09.pdf
- Royal Society (2009) Geoengineering the climate: science, governance and uncertainty, Royal Society Policy document 10/09, ISBN: 978-0-85403-773-5Google Scholar
- United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) (2010) The Emissions Gap Report: are the Copenhagen Accord Pledges sufficient to limit global warming to 2C or 1.5C. http://www.unep.org/publications/ebooks/emissionsgapreport. Accessed 5th September 2011
- UNEP (2011) Bridging the Emissions Gap. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). http://www.unep.org/pdf/UNEP_bridging_gap.. Accessed 21st December 2011