Climatic Change

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 169–188 | Cite as

Shifting public opinion on climate change: an empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U.S., 2002–2010

  • Robert J. Brulle
  • Jason Carmichael
  • J. Craig Jenkins
Article

Abstract

This paper conducts an empirical analysis of the factors affecting U.S. public concern about the threat of climate change between January 2002 and December 2010. Utilizing Stimson’s method of constructing aggregate opinion measures, data from 74 separate surveys over a 9-year period are used to construct quarterly measures of public concern over global climate change. We examine five factors that should account for changes in levels of concern: 1) extreme weather events, 2) public access to accurate scientific information, 3) media coverage, 4) elite cues, and 5) movement/countermovement advocacy. A time-series analysis indicates that elite cues and structural economic factors have the largest effect on the level of public concern about climate change. While media coverage exerts an important influence, this coverage is itself largely a function of elite cues and economic factors. Weather extremes have no effect on aggregate public opinion. Promulgation of scientific information to the public on climate change has a minimal effect. The implication would seem to be that information-based science advocacy has had only a minor effect on public concern, while political mobilization by elites and advocacy groups is critical in influencing climate change concern.

Supplementary material

10584_2012_403_MOESM1_ESM.docx (77 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 77 kb)

References

  1. Achen C (2001) Why lagged dependent variables can suppress the explanatory power of other independent variables. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, 2000Google Scholar
  2. Agnone J (2007) Amplifying public opinion: the policy impact of the U.S. environmental movement. Soc Forces 85(4):1593–1620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews K, Caren N (2010) Making the news: movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. Am Sociol Rev 75(6):841–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkinson M, Baumgartner F, Coggins K, Stimson J (2011) Mood and agendas: developing policy-specific conceptions of mood. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago IL. March 31, 2011Google Scholar
  5. Bauer M, Allum N, Miller S (2007) What can we learn from 25-years of PUS research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Underst Sci 16:79–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Best S (1999) The sampling problem in measuring policy mood: an alternative solution. J Polit 61(3):721–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolsen T, Cook F (2008) The polls-trends: public opinion on energy policy: 1974–2006. Public Opin Quart 72(2):364–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bord RJ, O’Connor RE, Fisher (2000) A. In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Public Underst Sci 9:199–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borick C, Rabe B (2010) A reason to believe; examining the factors that determine individual views on global warming. Soc Sci Q 91(3):777–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brewer PR, Pease A (2008) Federal climate politics in the United States: polarization and paralysis. In: Compston H, Bailey I (eds) Turning down the heat: the politics of climate policy in affluent democracies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 85–103Google Scholar
  11. Brick P, McGreggor Cawley R (2008) Producing political climate change; the hidden life of U.S. environmentalism. Environ Polit 17(2):200–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Darmofal D (2009) Elite cues and citizen disagreement with expert opinion. Polit Res Quart 58(3):381–395Google Scholar
  13. Dumitrescu D, Mughan A (2010) Mass media and democratic politics. In: Leicht KT, Craig Jenkins J (eds) The handbook of politics: state and civil society in global perspective. Springer Publishers, New York, pp 477–491Google Scholar
  14. Enns PK, Kellstedt P (2008) Policy mood and political sophistication: why everybody moves mood. British J Polit Sci 38:433–454Google Scholar
  15. Erikson, Mackuen RM, Stimson J (2002) The Macro Polity, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Gamson W, Wolfsfeld G (1993) Movements and media as interacting systems. Ann Am Acad Polit Soc Sci 528:114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gamson WA, Croteau D, Hoynes W, Sasson T (1992) Media images and the social construction of reality. Annu Rev Sociol 18:373–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gelpi C, Feaver P, Reifler J (2009) Paying the human costs of war: American public opinion and casualties in military conflicts. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  19. Gleason K, Lawrimore J, Levinson D, Karl T, Karoly D (2008) A revised U.S. climate extremes index. J Clim 21:2124–2137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenberg J, Knight G, Westersund E (2011) Spinning climate change: corporate and NGO public relations strategies in Canada and the United States. Int Commun Gaz 73(1–2):65–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habermas J (1989) The public sphere: an encyclopedia article. In: Bronner E, Kellner D (eds) Critical theory and society. Routledge, New York, pp 102–107Google Scholar
  22. Hamilton L (2010) Education, politics and opinions about climate change evidence for interaction effects. Clim Chang 104(2):379–422Google Scholar
  23. Hindman DB (2009) Mass media flow and differential distribution of politically disputed beliefs: the belief gap hypothesis. Journal Mass Commun Quart 86(4):790–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahn ME, Kotchen MJ (2010) Environmental concern and the business cycle: the chilling effect of recession. NBER Working Paper No. 16241, issued July 2010.Google Scholar
  25. Keele L, Kelly N (2005) Dynamic models for dynamic theories: the ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis 14(2):186–205Google Scholar
  26. Kellstedt PM (2003) The mass media and the dynamics of American racial attitudes. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Kellstedt, Zahran PS, Vedlitz A (2008) Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Anal 28(1):113–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koopmans R (2004) Movements and media: selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory Soc 33:367–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krosnick J, Holbrook A, Lowe L, Visser P (2008) The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming, Climatic Change SpringGoogle Scholar
  30. Lenz G (2009) Learning and opinion change, not priming; reconsidering the priming hypothesis. Am J Polit Sci 53(4):821–837Google Scholar
  31. Lowry W (2008) Disentangling energy policy from environmental policy. Soc Sci Q 89(5):1195–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Luke T (2005) The death of environmentalism or the advent of public ecology? Organ Environ 18:489–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacKuen M (1981) Social communication and the mass policy agenda. In: Mackuen MB, Coombs SL (eds) More than news; media power in public affairs. Sage, Beverly hills, pp 19–144Google Scholar
  34. Malka A, Krosnick J, Langer G (2009) The association of knowledge with concern about global warming; trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal 29(5):633–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marquart-Pyatt SR, Shwom T, Dietz R, Dunlap S, Kaplowitz AMcCright, Zahran S (2011) Understanding public opinion on climate change: a call for research. Environment 53(4):38–42Google Scholar
  36. Mazur A (1998) Global environmental change in the news: 1987-90 vs. 1992–1996. Int Sociol 13:457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazur A (2009) American generation of environmental warnings: avian influenza and global warming. Human Ecol Rev 16(1):17–26Google Scholar
  38. Mazur A, Lee J (1993) Sounding the global alarm: environmental issues in the U.S. national news. Soc Stud Sci 23:681–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCombs M (2004) Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion. Polity, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  40. McCright A, Dunlap R (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52(2):155–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McDonald S (2009) Changing climate, changing minds; applying the literature on media effects, public opinion, and the issue-attention cycle to increase public understanding of climate change. Int J Sustain Commun 4:45–63Google Scholar
  42. Oreskes N, Conway E (2010) Merchants of doubt. Bloomsbury Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Orr D (2005) Death and resurrection: the future of environmentalism. Conserv Biol 19:992–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pfau M, Haigh M, Sims J, Wigley S (2007) The influence of corporate front-group stealth campaigns. Commun Res 34(1):73–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pidgeon N, Fischoff B (2011) The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat Clim Change 1:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pooley E (2010) The climate war: true believers, power brokers, and the fight to save the earth. Hyperion Press, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Reynolds T, Bostrom A, Read D, Granger Morgan M (2010) Now what do people know about global climate change? survey sudies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal 80(10):1520–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sampei Y, Aoyagi-Usui M (2008) Mass-media coverage, its influence on public awareness of climate-change issues, and implications for Japan’s national campaign to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Glob Environ Chang 19:203–212Google Scholar
  49. Shipan C, Lowry W (2001) Environmental policy and party divergence in congress. Polit Res Quart 54(2):245–263Google Scholar
  50. Smith G (2010) Politicians and the news media; how elite attacks influence perceptions of media bias. Int J Press/Polit 15:319–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon N (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Change 1:46–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sterman J (2011) Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world. Clim Chang 108:811–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stimson JA (1999) Public opinion in America; moods, cycles and swings, 2nd edn. Westview Press, Boulder CoGoogle Scholar
  54. Stimson JA (2004) Tides of consent: how public opinion shapes American politics. Cambridge University Press, NYCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strömbäch J, Kiousis S (2011) Political public relations: principles and applications. Routledge Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Wanta W, Hu Yu (1994) Time-lag differences in the agenda setting process; an examination of five news media. Int J Public Opin Res 6:225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watt JH, Mazza M, Snyder L (1993) Agenda-setting effects of television news coverage and the effects decay curve. Commun Res 20:408–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weber E (2011) Climate change hits home. Nat Clim Change 1:25–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Weber E, Stern P (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66(4):315–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yin J (1999) Elite Opinion and Media Diffusion: Exploring Environmental Attitudes. Harvard Int J Press/Polit 4(3):62–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zaller JR (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion. University Press, New York: CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhao X (2009) Media use and global warming perceptions: a snapshot of the reinforcing spirals. Commun Res 36:698–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhao X, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C (2011) Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. J Commun. (in press)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert J. Brulle
    • 1
  • Jason Carmichael
    • 2
  • J. Craig Jenkins
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Culture and CommunicationsDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of SociologyOhio State UniversityColumbusCanada

Personalised recommendations