Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 112, Issue 1, pp 127–142 | Cite as

The integration of PESETA sectoral economic impacts into the GEM-E3 Europe model: methodology and results

  • Juan-Carlos CiscarEmail author
  • László Szabó
  • Denise van Regemorter
  • Antonio Soria
Article

Abstract

The PESETA project has estimated the physical effects of climate change in Europe for the following impact categories with a market valuation: agriculture, river floods, coastal systems and tourism. Four alternative scenarios of future climate change have been considered. The computable general equilibrium (CGE) GEM-E3 model for Europe has been used to integrate the PESETA damages under a consistent economic framework. The approach followed has been to assess the effects of future climate (as of 2080s) on today’s economy. This article details the way each sectoral impact has been integrated into the CGE model. The EU welfare loss is estimated to be in a range of 0.2% to 1%, depending on the climate future and the projected sea level rise. Results show that the Southern Europe region appears as the most vulnerable area to climate change. Impacts in coastal systems, agriculture and river floods determine the overall and regional pattern of impacts within Europe.

Keywords

Total Factor Productivity Impact Category Welfare Loss Coastal System Computable General Equilibrium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Ana Iglesias and Sonia Quiroga for discussions on the agriculture application. We also thank Marc Mueller (IPTS) for providing us with the EEA data, and Bert Saveyn and Ignacio Pérez (both at IPTS) for reviewing the document.

We would like to thank Samuel Fankhauser, Hans-Martin Füssel, Ger Klaassen, and Leonidas Paroussos, and two anonymous referees for their comments.

References

  1. Ackerman F, Stanton EA, Hope C, Alberth S (2009) Did the Stern review underestimate US and global climate damages? Energ Pol 37:2717–2721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amelung B, Moreno A (2011) Costing the impact of climate change on tourism in Europe: results from the PESETA project. Clim ChangGoogle Scholar
  3. Armington PS (1969) A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. Int Monetary Fund Staff Paper 16:159–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosello F, Zhang J (2005) Assessing climate change impacts: agriculture. FEEM Nota di Lavoro 94.2005Google Scholar
  5. Bosello F, Lazzarin M, Roson R, Tol R (2004) Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: sea level rise. FEEM Nota di Lavoro 96.2004Google Scholar
  6. Bosello F, Nicholls R, Richards J, Roson R, Tol RSJ (2011) Economic impacts of climate change in Europe: sea-level rise. Clim ChangGoogle Scholar
  7. Carter TR (ed) (2007) Assessing the adaptive capacity of the Finnish environment and society under a changing climate: FINADAPT. Fin Environ 1/2007Google Scholar
  8. Christensen OB, Goodess CM, Ciscar JC (2011) Methodological framework of the PESETA project on the impacts of climate change in Europe. Clim ChangGoogle Scholar
  9. Ciscar JC, Iglesias A, Feyen L, Szabó L, Van Regemorter D, Amelung B, Nicholls R, Watkiss P, Christensen OB, Dankers R, Garrote L, Goodess CM, Hunt A, Moreno A, Richards J, Soria A (2011) Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:2678–2683. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011612108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Darwin RF, Tol RSJ (2001) Estimates of the economic effects of sea level rise. Environ Resour Econ 19:129–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. E3MLAB (2010) General equilibrium model for economy–energy–environment, model manual, http://www.e3mlab.ntua.gr/manuals/Manual_of_GEM-E3.pdf
  12. Fankhauser S, Tol RSJ (1996) Climate change costs. Recent advancements in the economic assessment. Energ Pol 24:665–673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fankhauser S, Tol RSJ (2005) On climate change and economic growth. Resource Energ Econ 27:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feyen L, Dankers R, Bódis, K, Salamon P, Barredo JI (2011) Climate warming and future flood risk in Europe. Clim ChangGoogle Scholar
  15. Halsnæs K, Kühl J, Olesen JE (2007) Turning climate change information into economic and health impacts. Clim Chang 81:145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB, Frumhoff PC, Maurer EP, Miller NL, Moser SC, Schneider SH, Cahill KN, Cleland EE, Dale L, Drapek R, Hanemann RM, Kalkstein LS, Lenihan J, Lunch CK, Neilson RP, Sheridan SC, Verville JH (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:12422–12427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Iglesias A, Garrote L, Quiroga, M, Moneo M (2011) A regional comparison of the effects of climate change on agriculture in Europe. Clim ChangGoogle Scholar
  18. Jorgenson DW, Goette R J, Hurd BH, Smith JB (2004) US market consequences of global climate change. Pew Center on Global Climate ChangeGoogle Scholar
  19. Mendelsohn R, Neumann JE (1999) The impact of climate change on the Unites States economy. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Nordhaus WD (1994) Managing the global commons. The Economics of Climate Change. The MIT PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Shoven JB, Whalley J (1992) Applying general equilibrium. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Stern N (2007) The Stern review of the economics of climate change. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Regemorter D (2005) GEM-E3. Computable general equilibrium model for studying economy-energy-environment interactions for Europe and the World, http://www.gem-e3.net/download/GEMmodel.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan-Carlos Ciscar
    • 1
    Email author
  • László Szabó
    • 1
  • Denise van Regemorter
    • 1
  • Antonio Soria
    • 1
  1. 1.Joint Research Center (JRC)Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS)SevillaSpain

Personalised recommendations