Advertisement

Climatic Change

, Volume 109, Supplement 1, pp 485–503 | Cite as

The climate gap: environmental health and equity implications of climate change and mitigation policies in California—a review of the literature

  • Seth B. Shonkoff
  • Rachel Morello-FroschEmail author
  • Manuel Pastor
  • James Sadd
Article
First Online:

Abstract

Climate change is an issue of great importance for human rights, public health, and socioeconomic equity because of its diverse consequences overall as well as its disproportionate impact on vulnerable and socially marginalized populations. Vulnerability to climate change is determined by a community’s ability to anticipate, cope with, resist, and recover from the impact of major weather events. Climate change will affect industrial and agricultural sectors, as well as transportation, health, and energy infrastructure. These shifts will have significant health and economic consequences for diverse communities throughout California. Without proactive policies to address these equity concerns, climate change will likely reinforce and amplify current as well as future socioeconomic disparities, leaving low-income, minority, and politically marginalized groups with fewer economic opportunities and more environmental and health burdens. This review explores the disproportionate impacts of climate change on vulnerable groups in California and investigates the costs and benefits of the climate change mitigation strategies specified for implementation in the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 (AB 32). Lastly, knowledge gaps, future research priorities, and policy implications are identified.

Keywords

Gross Domestic Product Heat Wave Extreme Weather Event Climate Change Policy Extreme Heat Event 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Work for this project was supported by: the California Air Resources Board, the California Environmental Protection Agency, the Annenberg Foundation, the Energy Foundation, and the Hewlett Foundation.

References

  1. Ackerman F, Stanton E (2008) The cost of climate change: what we’ll pay if global warming continues unchecked. NRDC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. ALA (2011) State of the air: 2011. American Lung Association, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  4. Bailey D, Knowlton K, Rotkin-Ellman M, NRDC (2008) Boosting the benefits: improving air quality and health by reducing global warming pollution in California. Natural Recources Defense Council, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Basu R, Ostro BD (2008) A multicounty analysis identifying the populations vulnerable to mortality associated with high ambient temperature in California. Am J Epidemiol 168(6):632–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Basu R, Feng WY, Ostro BD (2008) Characterizing temperature and mortality in nine California counties. Epidemiology 19(1):138–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. BLS (2002) Consumer expenditure survey. Bureau of Labor Statistics, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolin R, Bolton P (1986) Race, religion, and ethnicity in disaster recovery, program on environment and behavior. University of Colorado, Institute of Behavioral Science, Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  10. CARB (2006a) Assembly Bill No. 32: California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006Google Scholar
  11. CARB (2006b) Emission reduction plan for ports and goods movement in California. SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  12. CARB (2008a) Methodology for estimating premature deaths associated with long-term exposures to fine airborne particulate matter in California. California Air Resources Board, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  13. CARB (2008b) AB 32 Climate change scoping plan: a framework for change. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  14. CARB (2008c) Diesel particulate matter health risk assessment for the West Oakland community: preliminary summary of results. California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  15. CASS (2002) California agriculture statistical review. California Agriculture Statistics Service, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  16. CBO (2007) Trade-offs in allocating allowances for CO2 emissions. A series of issue summaries from the Congressional Budget Office. Congressional Budget Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  17. Corburn J (2005) Street science: community knowledge and environmental health justice. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Corburn J (2009) Cities, climate change and urban heat island mitigation: localising global environmental science. Urban Stud 46(2):413–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cordova R, Gelobter M, Hoerner A, Love J, Miller A, Saenger C, Zaidi D (2006) Climate change in California: health, economic and equity impacts. Redefining Progress, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  20. Costello C, Deschênes O, Kolstad C (2009) Economic impacts of climate change on California agriculture. Climate action team report. California Energy Commission; California Air Resources Board, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  21. CRAG (2002) Preparing for a changing climate: the potential consequences of climate variability and change for California. California Regional Assessment Group, US Global Change Research Program, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Curriero FC, Heiner KS, Samet JM, Zeger SL, Strug L, Patz JA (2002) Temperature and mortality in 11 cities of the eastern United States. Am J Epidemiol 155(1):80–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drury R, Belliveau M, Kuhn J, Bansal S (1999) Pollution trading and environmental injustice: Los Angeles’ failed experiment in air quality. Duke Environ Law Pol Forum 9:231–289Google Scholar
  24. EDD (2004) Occupational employment (2002) and wage (2003) data, occupational employment statistics survey results. California Employment Development Department. http://www.calmis.cahwnet.gov/file/occup$/oeswages/Cal$oes2003.htm. 2004
  25. Ellerman A, Buchner B (2007) The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme: origins, allocation, and early results. Rev Environ Econ Pol 1(1):66–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. English P, Fitzsimmons K, Hoshiko S, Kim T, Margolis H, McKone T, Rotkin-Ellman M, Solomon G, Trent R, Ross Z (2007) Public health impacts of climate change in California: community vulnerability assessments and adaptation strategies. Climate Change Public Health Impacts Assessment and Response Collaborative, California Department of Public Health Institute, RichmondGoogle Scholar
  27. EPA (2005) Toxics release inventory (TRI) basis of OSHA carcinogens. United States Environemental Protection Agency, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  28. Fothergill A, Peek L (2004) Poverty and disasters in the United States: a review of recent sociological findings. Nat Hazards J 32(1):89–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gage KL, Burkot TR, Eisen RJ, Hayes EB (2008) Climate and vectorborne diseases. Am J Prev Med 35(5):436–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenberg JH, Bromberg J, Reed CM, Gustafson TL, Beauchamp RA (1983) The epidemiology of heat-related deaths, Texas—1950, 1970–79, and 1980. Am J Public Health 73(7):805–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Greenough PG, Kirsch TD (2005) Hurricane Katrina. Public health response—assessing needs. N Engl J Med 353(15):1544–1546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Greenough G, McGeehin M, Bernard SM, Trtanj J, Riad J, Engelberg D (2001) The potential impacts of climate variability and change on health impacts of extreme weather events in the United States. Environ Health Perspect 109(Suppl 2):191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harlan S, Brazel A, Jenerette G, Jones N, Larsen L, Prashad L, Stefanov WItSoATIDotHIEatE, Research in Social Problems and Public Policy V, 173–202. (2008) In the shade of affluence: the inequitable distribution of the heat island. equity and the environment. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy 15 (173–202)Google Scholar
  34. Hassett K, Mathur A, Metcalf G (2008) The incidence of a U.S. carbon tax: a lifetime and regional analysis. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB, Frumhoff PC, Maurer EP, Miller NL, Moser SC, Schneider SH, Cahill KN, Cleland EE, Dale L, Drapek R, Hanemann RM, Kalkstein LS, Lenihan J, Lunch CK, Neilson RP, Sheridan SC, Verville JH (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(34):12422–12427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hepburn C, Grubb M, Neuhoff K, Matthes F, Tse M (2006) Auctioning of EU ETS phase II allowances: how and why? Clim Policy 6(1):137–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Howitt R, Medellín-Azuara J, MacEwan D (2009) Estimating the economic impact of agricultural yield related changes for California climate action team report. California Energy Commission; California Air Resources Board, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  38. Pacific Institute (2009) The impacts of sea-level rise on the California coast. The Pacific Institute, OaklandGoogle Scholar
  39. Jackson L, Santos-Martin F, Hollander A, Horwath W, Howitt R, Kramer J, O’Geen A, Orlove B, Six J, Sokolow S, Sumner D, Tomich T, Wheeler S (2009) Potential for adaptation to climate change in an agricultural landscape in the Central Valley of California of California. Climate Action Team Report. California Energy Commission; California Air Resources Board, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  40. Jacobson MZ (2007) Effects of ethanol (E85) versus gasoline vehicles on cancer and mortality in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 41(11):4150–4157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jacobson M (2008) On the causal link between carbon dioxide and air pollution mortality. Geophys Res Let 35 (L03809)Google Scholar
  42. Jerrett M, Burnett RT, Pope CA 3rd, Ito K, Thurston G, Krewski D, Shi Y, Calle E, Thun M (2009) Long-term ozone exposure and mortality. N Engl J Med 360(11):1085–1095. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0803894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaur S, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ (2009) Determinants of personal exposure to PM2.5, ultrafine particle counts, and CO in a transport microenvironment. Environ Sci Technol 43(13):4737–4743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kilbourne E (1997) Heat waves and hot environments. In: Noji E (ed) The public health consequences of disasters. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Klinenberg E (2002) Race, place, and vulnerability. In: Heat WaveGoogle Scholar
  46. Knowlton K, Rotkin-Ellman M, King G, Margolis H, Smith D, Solomon G, Trent R, English P (2009) The 2006 California heat wave: impacts on hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Environ Health Perspect 117(1):61–67Google Scholar
  47. Kovats RS, Hajat S (2008) Heat stress and public health: a critical review. Annu Rev Public Health 29:41–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kunzli N, McConnell R, Bates D, Bastain T, Hricko A, Lurmann F, Avol E, Gilliland F, Peters J (2003) Breathless in Los Angeles: the exhausting search for clean air. Am J Public Health 93 (9):1494–1499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lejano R, Hirose R (2005) Testing the assumptions behind emissions trading in non-market goods: the RECLAIM program in Southern California. Environ Sci Pol 8:367–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. MMWR (2008) Heat-related deaths among crop workers - United States, 1992–2006. Mortality and Morbidity Weekly Report 57(24):649–653Google Scholar
  51. Madsen AM (2006) Exposure to airborne microbial components in autumn and spring during work at Danish biofuel plants. Annals of Occupational Hygiene 50 (8):821–831. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mel052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Meleux F, Solmon F, Giorgi F (2007) Increase in summer European ozone amounts due to climate change. Atmos Environ 41(35):7577–7587. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.05.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Minkler M, Wallerstein N (2003) Community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  54. Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale B (2006) Separate and unequal: residential segregation and estimated cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics in U.S. metropolitan areas. Environ Health Perspect 114(3):386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morello-Frosch R, Lopez R (2006) The riskscape and the color line: examining the role of segregation in environmental health disparities. Environ Res 102(2):181–196. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2006.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M Jr, Porras C, Sadd J (2002) Environmental justice and regional inequality in southern California: implications for future research. Environ Health Perspect 110(Suppl 2):149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Sadd J, Shonkoff S (2009) The climate gap: inequalities in how climate change hurts Americans & how to close the gap. The Program for Environmental and Regional Equity (PERE), University of Southern CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  58. Ojerio R, Moseley C, Bania N, Lynn K (2010) The limited involvement of socially vulnerable populations in federal programs to mitigate wildfire risk in Arizona. Natural Hazards Review Posted ahead of print 10 June 2010Google Scholar
  59. Oke T (1973) City size and the urban heat island. Atmos Environ 7:769–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Neill C (2004) Mercury, risk and justice. ELR News and Analysis 34:11070–11115Google Scholar
  61. O’Neill MS, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J (2003) Modifiers of the temperature and mortality association in seven US cities. Am J Epidemiol 157(12):1074–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. O’Neill MS, Zanobetti A, Schwartz J (2005) Disparities by race in heat-related mortality in four US cities: the role of air conditioning prevalence. J Urban Health 82(2):191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. O’Neill MS, Kinney PL, Cohen AJ (2008) Environmental equity in air quality management: local and international implications for human health and climate change. J Toxicol Environ Health A 71(9–10):570–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pastor M, Morello-Frosch R, Sadd J (2010a) Air pollution and environmental justice: integrating indicators of cumulative impact and socio-economic vulnerability into regulatory decision-making. California Air Resources BoardGoogle Scholar
  65. Pastor M, Morello-Frosch R, Sadd J, Scoggins J (2010b) Minding the climate gap: what’s at stake if California’s climate law isn’t done right and right away. Program for Environmental and Regional Equity, University of Southern California, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  66. Phelan JC, Link BG, Diez-Roux A, Kawachi I, Levin B (2004) “Fundamental causes” of social inequalities in mortality: a test of the theory. J Health Soc Behav 45(3):265–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pittock B, Wratt D, Basher R, Bates B, Finlayson M, Gitay H, Woodward A, Arthington A, Beets P, Biggs B (2001) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Cambridge Univ Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  68. Poumadere M, Mays C, Le Mer S, Blong R (2005) The 2003 heat wave in France: dangerous climate change here and now. Risk Anal 25(6):1483–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rogot E, Sorlie PD, Backlund E (1992) Air-conditioning and mortality in hot weather. Am J Epidemiol 136(1):106–116Google Scholar
  70. Sadd J, Pastor M, Morello-Frosch R, Scoggins J, Jesdale B (2011) Playing it safe: Assessing Cumulative Impact and Social Vulnerability through an Environmental Justice Screening Method in the South Coast Air Basin, California. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 8:1441–1459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schulz A, Williams D, Israel BA, Lempert LB (2002) Racial and spatial relations as fundamental determinants of health in Detroit. Milbank Q 80(4):677–707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Semenza JC, Rubin CH, Falter KH, Selanikio JD, Flanders WD, Howe HL, Wilhelm JL (1996) Heat-related deaths during the July 1995 heat wave in Chicago. N Engl J Med 335(2):84–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shonkoff S, Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Sadd J (2009a) Environmental health and equity impacts from climate change and mitigation policies in California: a review of the literature. Climate Action Team Report, CARB, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  74. Shonkoff S, Morello-Frosch R, Pastor M, Sadd J (2009b) Minding the climate gap: environmental health and equity implications of climate change mitigation policies in California. Environ Justice 2(4):173–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith K, Jerrett M, Anderson H, Burnett R, Stone V, Derwent R, Atkinson R, Cohen A, Shonkoff S, Krewski D, Pope C III, Thun M, Thurston G (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: health implications of short-lived greenhouse pollutants. Lancet 6736(9):56–69Google Scholar
  76. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KT, M, Miller H, (Eds.) (2007) Working Group I Report: “The Physical Science Basis”. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USGoogle Scholar
  77. Stathopoulou E, Mihalakakou G, Santamouris M, Bagiorgas HS (2008) On the impact of temperature on tropospheric ozone concentration levels in urban environments. J Earth Syst Sci 117(3):227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Su J, Morello-Frosch R, Jesdale B, Kyle A, Shamasunder B, Jerrett M (2009) An index for assessing demographic inequalities in cumulative environmental hazards with application to Los Angeles, California. Environ Sci Technol 43(20):7626–7634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Swiss Re (2006) Natural catastrophes and man-made disasters 2005: high earthquake casualties, new dimension in windstorm lossesGoogle Scholar
  80. Tenenbaum D (2008) Food vs. fuel: diversion of crops could cause more hunger. Environ Health Perspect 116(6):A254–A257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Thomalla F, Downing T, Spanger-Siegfried E, Han G, Rockström J (2006) Reducing hazard vulnerability: towards a common approach between disaster risk reduction and climate adaptation. Disasters 30(1):39–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tierney K (1988) The Whittier Narrows, California earthquake of October 1, 1987—social aspects. Earthquake Spectra 4(1):11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. USCB (2004) Current housing reports, American Housing Survey for the Los Angeles-Long Beach Metropolitan Area: 2003. U.S. Census BureauGoogle Scholar
  85. USCB (2005) California—County. Percent of people below poverty level in the past 12 months (for whom poverty status is determined): 2005. United States Census Bureau. http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/GCTTable?_bm=y&-geo_id=04000US06&-_box_head_nbr=GCT1701&-ds_name=ACS_2005_EST_G00_&-_lang=en&-mt_name=ACS_2005_EST_G00_GCT1701_ST2&-format=ST-2. Accessed July 2008 2008
  86. Walls M, Hanson J (1996) Distributional impacts of an environmental tax shift: the case of motor vehicle emissions taxes. Resources for the Future, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  87. Whitman S, Good G, Donoghue ER, Benbow N, Shou W, Mou S (1997) Mortality in Chicago attributed to the July 1995 heat wave. Am J Public Health 87(9):1515–1518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Williams D, Collins C (2001) Racial residential segregation: a fundamental cause of racial disparities in health. Publ Health Rep 116:404–416Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seth B. Shonkoff
    • 1
  • Rachel Morello-Frosch
    • 2
    Email author
  • Manuel Pastor
    • 3
  • James Sadd
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, Division of Society and EnvironmentUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management & School of Public HealthUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Departments of Geography and American Studies and EthnicityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.Department of Environmental Science and GeologyOccidental CollegeLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options