The impact of climate change on California timberlands
- 459 Downloads
California timber production has been declining in an era of warming, increased wildfires, land conversion, and growing emphasis on recreation. Climate change has the potential to further affect California timber production through changes in individual tree growth rates, forest dieback, and shifts in species ranges and ecosystem composition. Coupled with changes in global timber prices, themselves the result of productivity effects, these production impacts hold important consequences for California’s private timberlands. This study uses models that project tree species productivity and movement across the landscape under climate change, coupled with economic models of landowner adaptation and returns from multiple harvest strategies. Our results show that under likely price scenarios, climate change will result in an overall decline in harvested timber value relative to no climate change, with decreases of 4.9 to 8.5% by the end of the century. The magnitude of decrease depends on climate change scenario, price scenario and management option – with dollar losses totaling up to $8.1 billion in total land value (−$2.7 billion given a 4% discount rate). There is substantial spatial variation in these changes; most areas show significant declines in timber value while some show modest increases relative to a no climate change baseline. If prices are not affected by climate change, more areas experience gains in value. We find that forestry management strategies can mitigate lost value, indicating that climate change adaptation programs can yield important economic benefits. Declining timber value corresponds disproportionately to areas already experiencing timberland conversion to housing or agriculture. Policy measures to stem conversion of devalued timberlands may warrant consideration.
KeywordsClimate Change Timber Climate Change Impact Carbon Market Price Series
C. Guo was supported by the ConvEne IGERT program of NSF.
- Alig R, Adans D, McCarl B, Callaway JM, Winnett S (1997) Assessing effects of mitigation strategies for global climate change with an intertemporal model of the U.S. Forest and Agriculture Sectors. Environ Resource Econ 9:259–274Google Scholar
- California State Board of Equalization (2010) California timber harvest statistics. http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/pdf/harvyr2.pdf
- Callaway J, Smith J, Keefe S (1994) The economic effects of climate change for U.S. forests. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Adaptation Branch, Climate Change Division, Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- Joyce L, Aber J, McNulty S, Dale V, Hansen A, Irland L, Neilson1 R, Skog K (2001) Potential consequences of climate variability and change for the forests of the United States. Climate change impacts in the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change (Ch. 17). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
- Mendelsohn R, Smith J (2006) The impact of climate change on regional systems: a comprehensive analysis of California. Elgar, NorthamptonGoogle Scholar
- Perez-Garcia J, Joyce L, Binkley A, Clark S, McGuire A (1997) Economic Impacts of Climatic Change on the Global Forest Sector: An Integrated Ecological Economic Assessment. Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
- Sands PJ (2001) 3PGPJS—a user-friendly interface to 3-PG, the Landsberg and Waring model of forest productivity. Tech. Rep. 29(2). CRC for Sustainable Production Forestry and CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, Hobart, TasmaniaGoogle Scholar
- Spero J (2006) California timber yield tax volume and value trends: historical BOE timber harvest data by species, county, ownership. http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/projects/BOE/BOETimberTax.html
- Sohngen B, Mendelsohn R, Sedjo R (2001) A global model of climate change impacts on timber markets. Am J Agr Econ 26(2):326–343Google Scholar
- State Board of Equalization (2007) Harvest value schedule, effective July 1, 2007–December 31, 2007Google Scholar