Climatic Change

, Volume 109, Supplement 1, pp 407–427 | Cite as

Case study on potential agricultural responses to climate change in a California landscape

  • L. E. JacksonEmail author
  • S. M. Wheeler
  • A. D. Hollander
  • A. T. O’Geen
  • B. S. Orlove
  • J. Six
  • D. A. Sumner
  • F. Santos-Martin
  • J. B. Kramer
  • W. R. Horwath
  • R. E. Howitt
  • T. P. Tomich


Agriculture in the Central Valley of California, one of the USA’s main sources of fruits, nuts, and vegetables, is highly vulnerable to climate change impacts in the next 50 years. This interdisciplinary case study in Yolo County shows the urgency for building adaptation strategies to climate change. Climate change and the effects of greenhouse gas emissions are complex, and several of the county’s current crops will be less viable in 2050. The study uses a variety of methods to assemble information relevant to Yolo County’s agriculture, including literature reviews, models, geographic information system analysis, interviews with agency personnel, and a survey of farmers. Potential adaptation and mitigation responses by growers include changes in crop taxa, irrigation methods, fertilization practices, tillage practices, and land use. On a regional basis, planning must consider the vulnerability of agricultural production and the tradeoffs associated with diversified farmlands, drought, flooding of cropland, loss of habitat for wild species of concern, and urbanization.


Climate Change Heat Wave Cover Crop Conservation Tillage Vegetative Filter Strip 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Backlund P, Janetos A, Schimel D (2008) The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity. Climate Change Science Program. Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.3Google Scholar
  2. Baldocchi D, Wong S (2006) An assessment of the impacts of future CO2 and climate on California agriculture. CEC-500-2005-187. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research ProgramGoogle Scholar
  3. Barbour M, Pavlik B, Drysdale F, Lindstron S (1993) California’s changing landscapes. California Native Plant Society, SacramentoGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett TP, Pierce DW, Hidalgo HG, Bonfils C, Santer BD, Das T, Bala G, Wood AW, Nozawa T, Mirin AA, Cayan DR, Dettinger MD (2008) Human-induced changes in the hydrology of the western United States. Science 319:1080–1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bazzaz FA, Sombroek W (1996) Global climate change and agricultural production. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloom AJ (2009) As carbon dioxide rises, food quality will decline without careful nitrogen management. Calif Agr 63:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brodt S, Klonsky K, Jackson LE, Brush SB, Smukler SM (2009) Factors affecting adoption of hedgerows and other biodiversity-enhancing features on farms in California, USA. Agroforestry Systems 76:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broome JC, Worthington M (2009) Research and extension needs assessment for organic growers in Sacramento, Solano and Yolo Counties. Univ of California Agriculture and Natural Resources.
  9. California Department of Water Resources (1997) Yolo County Land Use DatabaseGoogle Scholar
  10. California Department of Water Resources (2006) Progress on incorporating climate change into planning and management of California’s water resources.
  11. Cavagnaro T, Jackson LE, Scow KM (2006) Climate change: challenges and solutions for California agricultural landscapes. CEC-500-2005-189-SF. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research ProgramGoogle Scholar
  12. Cayan D, Tyree M, Dettinger M, Hidalgo H, Das T, Maurer E, Bromirski P, Graham N, Flick R (2009) Climate change scenarios and sea level rise estimates for the California Climate Change Scenarios Assessment. CEC-500-2009-014-D. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research ProgramGoogle Scholar
  13. CEC (California Energy Commission) (2005) Research roadmap for greenhouse gas inventory methods. CEC-500-2005-097. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research ProgramGoogle Scholar
  14. CEC (California Energy Commission) (2006) Inventory of California greenhouse gas emissions and sinks: 1990 to 2004. Sacramento, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  15. Condon AG, Hall AE (1997) Adaptation to diverse environments: variation in water-use efficiency within crop species. In: Jackson LE (ed) Ecology in agriculture. Academic, San Diego, pp 79–116, ISBN 0126312605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conrad JH (1985) Feeding of farm animals in hot and cold environments. In: Yousef MK (ed) Stress physiology in livestock: ungulates, vol 2. CRC Press Inc, Florida, pp 205–226Google Scholar
  17. de Graaff MA, van Groenigen KJ, Six J, Hungate B, van Kessel C (2006) Interactions between plant growth and soil nutrient cycling under elevated CO2: a meta-analysis. Glob Chang Biol 12:2077–2091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De Gryze S, Wolf A, Kaffka SR, Mitchell JP, Rolston DE, Temple SR, Lee J, Six J (2010) Simulating greenhouse gas budgets of four California cropping systems under conventional and alternative management. Ecol Appl 20:1805–1819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. deJong TM (2005) Using physiological concepts to understand early spring temperature effects on fruit growth and anticipating fruit size problems at harvest. Summerfruit Australia Quarterly 7:10–13Google Scholar
  20. Del Grosso S, Ojima D, Parton W, Mosier A, Peterson G, Schimel D (2002) Simulated effects of dryland cropping intensification on soil organic matter and greenhouse gas exchanges using the DAYCENT ecosystem model. Environ Pollut 116:S75–S83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dukes JS, Chiariello NR, Cleland EE, Moore LA, Shaw MR, Thayer S, Tobeck T, Mooney HA, Field CB (2005) Responses of grassland production to single and multiple global environmental changes. PLoS Biol 3:1829–1837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Field CB, Daily GC, Davis FW, Gaines S, Matson PA, Melack J, Miller NL (1999) Confronting climate change in California: ecological impacts on the Golden State. Report of the Union of Concerned Scientists and the Ecological Society of America. Cambridge, MA and Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  23. Grismer ME, O’Geen AT, Lewis DJ (2005) Sediment control with vegetative filter strips (VFSs). Publ. 8195. Univ of California Department of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanson B, Hopmans JW, Simonek J (2008) Leaching with subsurface drip irrigation under saline, shallow groundwater conditions. Vadose Zone Journal 7:810–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB, Frumhoff PC, Maurer EP, Miller NL, Moser SC, Schneider SH, Cahill KN, Cleland EE, Dale L, Drapek R, Hanemann RM, Kalkstein LS, Lenihan J, Lunch CK, Neilson RP, Sheridan SC, Verville JH (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12422–12427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Herzog SK (1996) Wintering Swainson’s Hawks in California’s Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta. The condor. 98:876–879Google Scholar
  27. Hill JK, Thomas CD, Huntley B (1999) Climate and habitat availability determine 20th century changes in a butterfly’s range margin. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:1197–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horwath WR, Devêvre OC, Doane TA, Kramer AW, van Kessel C (2002) Soil C sequestration management effects on N cycling and availability. In: Lal R, Follett RF, Kimble JM (eds) Agricultural practices and policies for carbon sequestration in soil. Lewis, Florida, pp 155–164Google Scholar
  29. Hungate BA, Stiling PD, Dijkstra P, Johnson DW, Ketterer ME, Hymus GJ, Hinkle CR, Drake BG (2004) CO2 elicits long-term decline in nitrogen fixation. Science 304:1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jackson LE, Ramirez I, Yokota R, Fennimore SA, Koike ST, Henderson D, Chaney WE, Calderón FJ, Klonsky K (2004) On-farm assessment of organic matter and tillage management on vegetable yield, soil, weeds, pests, and economics in California. Agric Ecosyst Environ 103:443–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jackson LE, Pascual U, Hodgkin T (2007) Utilizing and conserving agrobiodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 121:196–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackson LE, Santos-Martin F, Hollander AD, Horwath WR, Howitt RE, Kramer JB, O’Geen AT, Orlove BS, Six JW, Sokolow SK, Sumner DA, Tomich TP, Wheeler SM (2009) Potential for adaptation to climate change in an agricultural landscape in the Central Valley of California. CEC-500-2009-044-D. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research ProgramGoogle Scholar
  33. Johnston WE, McCalla AF (2004) Whither California agriculture: up, down, or out? Giannini Foundation Special Report, Univ of CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  34. Kallenbach CM, Rolston DE, Horwath WR (2010) Cover cropping affects soil N2O and CO2 emissions differently depending on type of irrigation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 137:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kong AYY, Fonte SJ, van Kessel C, Six J (2009) Transitioning from standard to minimum tillage: trade-offs between soil organic matter stabilization, nitrous oxide emissions, and N availability in irrigated cropping systems. Soil Till Res 104:256–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krusekopf HH, Mitchell JP, Hartz TK, May DM, Miyao EM, Cahn MD (2002) Pre-sidedress soil nitrate testing identifies processing tomato fields not requiring sidedress N fertilizer. Hortscience 37:520–524Google Scholar
  37. Kueppers LM, Snyder MA, Sloan LC, Zavaleta ES, Fulfrost B (2005) Modeled regional climate change and California endemic oak ranges. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:16281–16286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Landon R (2009) Wetlands—problems and solutions. Yolo County Farm Bureau News. September issue, p. 12Google Scholar
  39. Lee H, Sumner D (2009) Economics of biofuels feedstock in California: Projections based on policy and market conditions, Chevron-UC Davis Research Agreement Final Report (Project Number, RSO #8)Google Scholar
  40. Lee H, Sumner DA, Howitt RE (2001) Potential economic impacts of irrigation-water reductions estimated for Sacramento Valley. Calif Agr 55:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee J, De Gryze S, Six J (2010) Effect of climate change on field crop production in the Central Valley of California. Climatic Change, this issueGoogle Scholar
  42. Lobell DB, Field CB (2009) California perennial crops in a changing climate. CEC-500-2009-039-F. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research ProgramGoogle Scholar
  43. Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Leakey ADB, Nosberger J, Ort DR (2006) Food for thought: lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science 312:1918–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Luedeling E, Zhang M, Girvetz EH (2009) Climatic changes lead to declining winter chill for fruit and nut trees in California during 1950–2099. PLoS One 4(7):e6166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mikkelsen DS (1983) Field crops. In: Scheuring AF (ed) A guidebook to California agriculture. Univ of California Press, Berkeley, pp 109–135Google Scholar
  46. Miller NL, Jin J, Hayhoe K, Auffhammer M (2007) Climate change, extreme heat, and electricity demand in California. CEC-500-2007-023. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research ProgramGoogle Scholar
  47. Mitloehner FM, Sun H, Karlik JF (2009) Direct measurements improve estimates of dairy greenhouse-gas emissions. Calif Agr 63:79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mitsch WJ, Gosselink JG (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Moya TB, Ziska LH, Namuco OS, Olszyk D (1998) Growth dynamics and genotypic variation in tropical, field-grown paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.) in response to increasing carbon dioxide and temperature. Glob Chang Biol 4:645–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. NCCP/HCP (Yolo County Natural Community Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan) (2006) Yolo County natural community conservation plan/habitat conservation planGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Farrell PJ, Anderson PML (2010) Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. O’Geen AT, Schwankl LJ (2006) Understanding soil erosion in irrigated agriculture. Publ. 8196. Univ of California Department of Agriculture and National ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  53. O’Geen AT, Prichard TL, Elkins R, Pettygrove GS (2006) Orchard floor management to reduce erosion. Publ. 8202. Univ of California Department of Agriculture and Natural ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  54. Palm CA, Smukler SM, Sullivan CC, Mutuo PK, Nyadzi GI, Walsh MG (2010) Identifying potential synergies and trade-offs for meeting food security and climate change objectives in sub-Saharan Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 46:19661–19666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peng SB, Huang JL, Sheehy JE, Laza RC, Visperas RM, Zhong XH, Centeno GS, Khush GS, Cassman KG (2004) Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:9971–9975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Poudel DD, Horwath WR, Mitchell JP, Temple SR (2001) Impacts of cropping systems on soil nitrogen storage and loss. Agr Syst 68:253–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Purcell AH, Hopkins DL (1996) Fastidious xylem-limited bacterial plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 34:131–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rachmilevitch S, Cousins AB, Bloom AJ (2004) Nitrate assimilation in plant shoots depends on photorespiration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11506–11510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reich PB, Hobbie SE, Lee T, Ellsworth DS, West JB, Tilman D, Knops JMH, Naeem S, Trost J (2006) Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2. Nature 440:922–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reilly JM, Graham J (2001) Agriculture: the potential consequences of climate variability and change for the United States. Cambridge Univ Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Robins P, Holmes RB, Laddish K (2001) Bringing farm edges back to life. Yolo County Resource Conservation District.
  63. Sato S, Peet MM, Thomas JF (2000) Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under chronic, mild heat stress. Plant Cell Environ 23:719–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scherm H (2004) Climate change: can we predict the impacts on plant pathology and pest management? Can J Plant Pathol 26:267–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schneider MK, Lüscher A, Richter M, Aeschlimann U, Hartwig UA, Blum H, Frossard E, Nosberger J (2004) Ten years of free-air CO2 enrichment altered the mobilization of N from soil in Lolium perenne L. swards. Glob Chang Biol 10:1377–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shaw MR, Zavaleta ES, Chiariello NR, Cleland EE, Mooney HA, Field CB (2002) Grassland responses to global environmental changes suppressed by elevated CO2. Science 298:1987–1990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Six J, Ogle SM, Breidt FJ, Conant RT, Mosier AR, Paustian K (2004) The potential to mitigate global warming with no-tillage is only realized when practiced in the long-term. Glob Chang Biol 10:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smit B, Skinner MW (2002) Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 7:85–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smukler SM, Jackson LE, Moreno SS, Fonte SJ, Ferris H, Klonsky K, O’Geen AT, Scow KM, Steenwerth KL (2010) Biodiversity and multiple ecosystem functions in an organic farmscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139:80–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sokolow AD, Kuminoff NV (2000) Farmland, urbanization, and agriculture in the Sacramento region. Prepared for Capital Region Institute, Regional Futures CompendiumGoogle Scholar
  71. Southwick SM, Uyemoto J (1999) Cherry crinkle-leaf and deep suture disorders. Publ. 8007. Univ of California Department of Agriculture and National ResourcesGoogle Scholar
  72. Spencer W, Noss R, Marty J, Schwartz M, Soderstrom E, Bloom P, Wylie G (2006) Report of independent science advisors for Yolo County, natural community conservation plan/habitat conservation plan (NCCP/HCP). Conservation Biology InstituteGoogle Scholar
  73. Jones and Stokes (2001) A framework for the future: Yolo bypass management strategy: (J&S 99079) August. Prepared for Yolo Basin Foundation, Davis, CA. Sacramento, CAGoogle Scholar
  74. UC Davis Agriculture and Resource Economics Department (2008) University of California at Davis.
  75. Van Groenigen KJ, Six J, Hungate BA, de Graaff MA, van Breemen N, van Kessel C (2006) Element interactions limit soil C storage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6571–6574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Veenstra JJ, Horwath WR, Mitchell JP, Munk D (2006) Conservation tillage and cover crop influences soil properties in the San Joaquin Valley. Calif Agr 60:146–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weaver W, Shannon CE (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Univ of Illinois, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  78. West JW (2003) Effects of heat-stress on production in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 86:2131–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wheeler TR, Hadley P, Morison JIL, Ellis RH (1993) Effects of temperature on the growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) and the implications for assessing the impacts of potential climate change. Eur J Agron 2:305–311Google Scholar
  80. Williams JW, Seabloom EW, Slayback D, Stoms DM, Viers JH (2005) Anthropogenic impacts upon plant species richness and net primary productivity in California. Ecol Lett 8:127–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yamamura K, Kiritani K (1998) A simple method to estimate the potential increase in the number of generations under global warming in temperate zones. Appl Entomol Zool 33:289–298Google Scholar
  82. Yolo County (2007) Integrated regional water management plan. Water Resources Association of Yolo County
  83. Yolo County Agricultural Commissioner (1984–2007) Crop statistics.
  84. Young-Matthews A, Culman S, Sanchez-Moreno S, O’Geen AT, Ferris H, Hollander AD, Jackson LE (2010) Plant-soil biodiversity relationships and nutrient retention in agricultural riparian zones of the Sacramento Valley, California. Agroforestry Systems 80:41–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Ziska LH, Namuco O, Moya T, Quilang J (1997) Growth and yield response of field-grown tropical rice to increasing carbon dioxide and air temperature. Agron J 89:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. E. Jackson
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. M. Wheeler
    • 2
  • A. D. Hollander
    • 3
  • A. T. O’Geen
    • 1
  • B. S. Orlove
    • 4
  • J. Six
    • 5
  • D. A. Sumner
    • 6
  • F. Santos-Martin
    • 1
  • J. B. Kramer
    • 1
  • W. R. Horwath
    • 1
  • R. E. Howitt
    • 7
  • T. P. Tomich
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Land, Air and Water ResourcesUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental DesignUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  3. 3.Information Center for the EnvironmentUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  4. 4.Division School of International and Public Affairs and Center for Research on Environmental DecisionsColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  6. 6.Agricultural Issues CenterUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  7. 7.Department of Agricultural and Resource EconomicsUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  8. 8.Agricultural Sustainability InstituteUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations