Climatic Change

, Volume 109, Supplement 1, pp 119–132 | Cite as

Human-induced changes in wind, temperature and relative humidity during Santa Ana events

  • Mimi HughesEmail author
  • Alex Hall
  • Jinwon Kim


The frequency and character of Southern California’s Santa Ana wind events are investigated within a 12-km-resolution downscaling of late-20th and mid-21st century time periods of the National Center for Atmospheric Research Community Climate System Model global climate change scenario run. The number of Santa Ana days per winter season is approximately 20% fewer in the mid 21st century compared to the late 20th century. Since the only systematic and sustained difference between these two periods is the level of anthropogenic forcing, this effect is anthropogenic in origin. In both time periods, Santa Ana winds are partly katabatically-driven by a temperature difference between the cold wintertime air pooling in the desert against coastal mountains and the adjacent warm air over the ocean. However, this katabatic mechanism is significantly weaker during the mid 21st century time period. This occurs because of the well-documented differential warming associated with transient climate change, with more warming in the desert interior than over the ocean. Thus the mechanism responsible for the decrease in Santa Ana frequency originates from a well-known aspect of the climate response to increasing greenhouse gases, but cannot be understood or simulated without mesoscale atmospheric dynamics. In addition to the change in Santa Ana frequency, we investigate changes during Santa Anas in two other meteorological variables known to be relevant to fire weather conditions—relative humidity and temperature. We find a decrease in the relative humidity and an increase in temperature. Both these changes would favor fire. A fire behavior model accounting for changes in wind, temperature, and relative humidity simultaneously is necessary to draw firm conclusions about future fire risk and growth associated with Santa Ana events. While our results are somewhat limited by a relatively small sample size, they illustrate an observed and explainable regional change in climate due to plausible mesoscale processes.


regional climate climate change downslope winds fire weather 



Mimi Hughes is supported by a National Research Council Postdoctoral Associateship and National Science Foundation ATM-0735056, which also supports Alex Hall. Part of this work was performed using the National Center for Atmospheric Research supercomputer allocation 35681070. The research described in this paper was performed as an activity of the Joint Institute for Regional Earth System Science and Engineering, through an agreement between the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, and was sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Preprocessing of the Community Climate System Model data was also partially funded by the "National Comprehensive Measures against Climate Change” Program by Ministry of Environment, Korea (Grant No. 1600-1637-301-210-13) National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea. Computational resources for this study have been provided by Jet Propulsion Laboratory’s Supercomputing and Visualization Facility and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s Advanced Supercomputing Division.


  1. Castro R, Mascarenhas A, Martinez-Diaz-de Leon A, Durazo R, Gil-Silva E (2006) Spatial influence and oceanic thermal response to Santa Ana events along the Baja California peninsula. Atmosfera 19(3):195–211Google Scholar
  2. Chang S, Hahn D, Yang C, Norquist D, Ek M (1999) Validation study of the CAPS model and land surface scheme using the 1987 Cabauw/PILPS dataset. J Appl Meteorol 38:405–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli RK, Kwon W-T, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Menéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Conil S, Hall A (2006) Local regimes of atmospheric variability: a case study of Southern California. J Clim 19(17):4308–4325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diffenbaugh N, Pal J, Trapp R, Giorgi F (2005) Fine-scale processes regulate the response of extreme events to global climate change. PNAS 102(44):15 774–15 778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dudhia J (1989) Numerical study of convection observed during the winter monsoon experiment using a mesoscale two-dimensional model. J Atmos Sci 46(20):3077–3107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grell G, Dudhia J, Stauffer D (1994) A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5). Tech. rep., NCAR Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR.Google Scholar
  8. Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hong S, Pan H (1998) Convective trigger function for a mass flux cumulus parameterization scheme. Mon Weather Rev 126:2599–2620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hu H, Liu W (2003) Oceanic thermal and biological responses in Santa Ana winds. Geophys Res Lett 30(11):1596. doi: 10.1029/2003GL017208 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hughes M, Hall A (2010) Local and synoptic mechanisms causing Southern California’s Santa Ana winds. Clim Dyn 34(6):847–857. doi: 10.1007/s00382-009-0650-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jickells T, An ZS, Andersen KK, Baker AR, Bergametti G, Brooks N, Cao JJ, Boyd PW, Duce RA, Hunter KA, Kawahata H, Kubilay N, laRoche J, Liss PS, Mahowald N, Prospero JM, Ridgwell AJ, Tegen I, Torres R (2005) Global iron connections between desert dust, ocean biogeochemistry, and climate. Science 308:67–71. doi: 10.1126/science.1105959 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Keeley JE, Fotheringham CJ, Moritz MA (2004) Lessons from the October 2003 wildfires in southern California. J Forest 102:26–31Google Scholar
  14. Kim J, Lee J-E (2003) A multi-year regional climate hindcast for the western United States using the mesoscale atmospheric simulation model. J Hydrometeorol 4:878–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim J, Kim T-K, Arritt RW, Miller N (2002) Impacts of increased atmospheric CO2 on the hydroclimate of the western United States. J Clim 15:1926–1942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leung L, Ghan S (1999) Pacific Northwest climate sensitivity simulated by a regional climate model driven by a GCM. Part I: control simulations. J Clim 12:2010–2030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miller NL, Schlegel NJ (2006) Climate change projected fire weather sensitivity: California Santa Ana wind occurrence. Geophys Res Lett 33. doi: 10.1029/2006GL025808
  18. Mlawer E, Taubman S, Brown P, Iacono M, Clough S (1997) Radiative transfer for inhomogeneous atmosphere: RRTM, a validated correlated-k model for the longwave. J Geophys Res 102(D14):16663–16682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moritz M, Moody TJ, Krawchuk MA, Hughes M, Hall A (2010) Spatial variation in extreme winds predicts large wildfire locations in chaparral ecosystems. GRL. SubmittedGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakicenovic N, Swart R (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. Edited by Nebojsa Nakicenovic and Robert Swart, pp. 612. ISBN 0521804930. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, July 2000.Google Scholar
  21. Parish T, Cassano J (2003) Diagnosis of the katabatic wind influence on the wintertime Antarctic surface wind field from numerical simulations. Mon Weather Rev 131:1128–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raphael MN (2003) The Santa Ana winds of California. Earth Interact 7:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Skamarock W, Klemp J, Dudhia J, Gill D, Baker D, Wang W, Powers J (2005) A description of the advanced research WRF version 2. Tech. rep., NCAR Tech. Note, NCAR/TN468+STR.Google Scholar
  24. Sommers WT (1978) LFM forecast variables related to Santa Ana wind occurences. Mon Weather Rev 106:1307–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Syphard A, Radeloff V, Keeley J, Hawbaker T, Clayton M, Stewart S, Hammer R (2007) Human influence on California fire regimes. Ecol Appl 17:1388–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Trasvina A, Ortiz-Figueroa M, Herrera H, Coso MA, Gonzlez E (2003) Santa Ana winds and upwelling filaments off northern Baja California. Dyn Atmos Oceans 37(2):113–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Trenberth K, Jones P, Ambenje P, Bojariu R, Easterling D, Klein Tank A, Parker D, Rahimzadeh F, Renwick J, Rusticucci M, Soden B, Zhai P (2007) Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor M, Miller H (eds) Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Westerling AL, Cayan DR, Brown TJ, Hall BL, Riddle LG (2004) Climate, Santa Ana winds and autumn wildfires in Southern California. EOS 85(31):289–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increases Western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–943. doi: 10.1126/science.1128834 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Earth System Research Laboratory, Physical Sciences DivisionBoulderUSA
  2. 2.Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic SciencesUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations